From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail137.messagelabs.com (mail137.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 897A36B0012 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:25:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QOgMq-0007IC-QS for linux-mm@kvack.org; Tue, 24 May 2011 03:25:05 +0200 Received: from 50-47-173-54.evrt.wa.frontiernet.net ([50.47.173.54]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 03:25:04 +0200 Received: from yuhongbao_386 by 50-47-173-54.evrt.wa.frontiernet.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 03:25:04 +0200 From: Yuhong Bao Subject: Re: (Short?) merge window reminder Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 21:41:46 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20110523192056.GC23629@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: linux-mm@kvack.org Linus Torvalds linux-foundation.org> writes: > So I'm toying with 3.0 (and in that case, it really would be "3.0", > not "3.0.0" - the stable team would get the third digit rather than > the fourth one. > > But no, it wouldn't be for 42. Despite THHGTTG, I think "40" is a > fairly nice round number. So why not start Linux 2.7 or Linux 2.9? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org