From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
To: Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] procfs: provide stack information for threads
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 23:17:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2eipl7axx.fsf@igel.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1244146873.20012.6.camel@wall-e> (Stefani Seibold's message of "Thu, 04 Jun 2009 22:21:13 +0200")
Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net> writes:
> This is the newest version of the formaly named "detailed stack info"
> patch which give you a better overview of the userland application stack
> usage, especially for embedded linux.
>
> Currently you are only able to dump the main process/thread stack usage
> which is showed in /proc/pid/status by the "VmStk" Value. But you get no
> information about the consumed stack memory of the the threads.
>
> There is an enhancement in the /proc/<pid>/{task/*,}/*maps and which
> marks the vm mapping where the thread stack pointer reside with "[thread
> stack xxxxxxxx]". xxxxxxxx is the start address of the stack.
>
> Also there is a new entry "stack usage" in /proc/<pid>/{task/*,}/status
> which will you give the current stack usage in kb.
>
> I also fixed stack base address in /proc/<pid>/task/*/stat to the base
> address of the associated thread stack and not the one of the main
> process. This makes more sense.
That does not work right. I sometimes get meaningless values printed
for the stack usage in /proc/*/status (like 18014398509480456 kB), and
the stack start in /proc/*/stat is wrong. Apparently task->stack_start
contains the stack start of the _parent_ process.
$ awk '{printf "%x\n", $28}' /proc/self/stat; grep stack /proc/self/maps /proc/$$/maps
ffd34990
/proc/self/maps:ffa9c000-ffab1000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 [stack]
/proc/4054/maps:ffd22000-ffd37000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 [stack]
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-02 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-31 14:58 Detailed Stack Information Patch [1/3] Stefani Seibold
2009-04-01 19:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-02 21:26 ` Stefani Seibold
2009-06-03 20:34 ` Detailed Stack Information Patch Next Generation Stefani Seibold
2009-06-03 21:06 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-04 11:23 ` [patch] procfs: provide stack information for threads Stefani Seibold
2009-06-04 11:37 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-04 11:56 ` Stefani Seibold
2009-06-04 17:57 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-04 20:21 ` Stefani Seibold
2009-06-04 21:23 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-05 19:12 ` Stefani Seibold
2009-06-05 19:19 ` Andrew Morton
2009-10-02 21:17 ` Andreas Schwab [this message]
2009-10-02 21:44 ` Andreas Schwab
2009-10-03 6:47 ` Andreas Schwab
2009-10-03 7:40 ` Stefani Seibold
2009-10-03 11:33 ` Stefani Seibold
2009-06-06 10:01 ` [patch] procfs: provide stack information for threads V0.6 Stefani Seibold
2009-06-09 10:35 ` [patch] proc.txt: Update kernel filesystem/proc.txt documentation Stefani Seibold
2009-06-09 19:36 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-09 20:53 ` Stefani Seibold
2009-06-09 21:13 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-10 6:46 ` [patch 1/2] " Stefani Seibold
2009-06-10 6:46 ` [patch 2/2] procfs: provide stack information for threads V0.7 Stefani Seibold
2009-06-10 7:20 ` [patch 2/2] procfs: provide stack information for threads V0.8 Stefani Seibold
2009-06-15 22:01 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-16 7:14 ` Stefani Seibold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2eipl7axx.fsf@igel.home \
--to=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=stefani@seibold.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).