From: David Rientjes via Linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
davej@codemonkey.org.uk, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: (unknown)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 09:18:23 +1100 (AEDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.764.1453933035.12304.linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1453889401-43496-3-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 5626 bytes --]
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, davem@davemloft.net, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>, davej@codemonkey.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] x86: query dynamic DEBUG_PAGEALLOC setting
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 14:17:05 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1601271414180.23510@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> We can use debug_pagealloc_enabled() to check if we can map
> the identity mapping with 2MB pages. We can also add the state
> into the dump_stack output.
>
> The patch does not touch the code for the 1GB pages, which ignored
> CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC. Do we need to fence this as well?
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c | 5 ++---
> arch/x86/mm/init.c | 7 ++++---
> arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c | 14 ++++----------
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
> index 9c30acf..32e5699 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
> @@ -265,9 +265,8 @@ int __die(const char *str, struct pt_regs *regs, long err)
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> printk("SMP ");
> #endif
> -#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> - printk("DEBUG_PAGEALLOC ");
> -#endif
> + if (debug_pagealloc_enabled())
> + printk("DEBUG_PAGEALLOC ");
> #ifdef CONFIG_KASAN
> printk("KASAN");
> #endif
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init.c b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
> index 493f541..39823fd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
> @@ -150,13 +150,14 @@ static int page_size_mask;
>
> static void __init probe_page_size_mask(void)
> {
> -#if !defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC) && !defined(CONFIG_KMEMCHECK)
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_KMEMCHECK)
> /*
> - * For CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC, identity mapping will use small pages.
> + * For CONFIG_KMEMCHECK or pagealloc debugging, identity mapping will
> + * use small pages.
> * This will simplify cpa(), which otherwise needs to support splitting
> * large pages into small in interrupt context, etc.
> */
> - if (cpu_has_pse)
> + if (cpu_has_pse && !debug_pagealloc_enabled())
> page_size_mask |= 1 << PG_LEVEL_2M;
> #endif
>
I would have thought free_init_pages() would be modified to use
debug_pagealloc_enabled() as well?
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 150 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-27 22:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-27 10:09 [PATCH v3 0/3] Optimize CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Christian Borntraeger
2016-01-27 10:09 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] mm: provide debug_pagealloc_enabled() without CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Christian Borntraeger
2016-01-27 10:10 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] x86: query dynamic DEBUG_PAGEALLOC setting Christian Borntraeger
2016-01-27 22:17 ` David Rientjes
2016-01-28 9:48 ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-01-28 23:03 ` David Rientjes
2016-02-02 21:51 ` David Rientjes
2016-02-02 21:53 ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-02-02 22:21 ` Andrew Morton
2016-02-02 22:37 ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-02-02 23:04 ` Andrew Morton
2016-02-03 0:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-02-02 21:52 ` (unknown) David Rientjes via Linuxppc-dev
2016-01-28 23:04 ` (unknown) David Rientjes via Linuxppc-dev
2016-01-27 22:18 ` David Rientjes via Linuxppc-dev [this message]
2016-01-27 10:10 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] s390: query dynamic DEBUG_PAGEALLOC setting Christian Borntraeger
2016-01-27 22:18 ` David Rientjes
2016-01-27 22:22 ` (unknown) David Rientjes via Linuxppc-dev
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-04 14:11 (unknown) Jonathon Elmore
2004-02-22 4:41 (unknown) bhihjm
2003-01-24 5:08 (unknown), Anoop J.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mailman.764.1453933035.12304.linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--to=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).