From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: mpenttil@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@nvidia.com>,
"Leon Romanovsky" <leonro@nvidia.com>,
"Alistair Popple" <apopple@nvidia.com>,
"Balbir Singh" <balbirs@nvidia.com>, "Zi Yan" <ziy@nvidia.com>,
"Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Lorenzo Stoakes" <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>, "Lyude Paul" <lyude@redhat.com>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 04/12] mm/hmm: do the plumbing for HMM to participate in migration
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 06:06:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-181052@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261021060506.2377545-5-mpenttil@redhat.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] mm/hmm: broken migration entries in hmm_vma_handle_pte() and hmm_vma_walk_pmd()
- [High] mm/hmm: broken state and rollback in hmm_vma_walk_pmd() on retry after -EAGAIN
- [Medium] mm/hmm: hmm_vma_walk_pmd() aborts PMD walk and clobbers PFNs on split failure
--
commit 25901a209351c6985ba22f8dfc40a2db03ec4bdf
Author: Mika Penttilä <mpenttil@redhat.com>
mm/hmm: do the plumbing for HMM to participate in migration
This commit adds page table locking state and migration preparation plumbing
to hmm_range_fault() and its pagewalk callbacks in mm/hmm.c so that PTE and
PMD locks are held across entry handling and migration collection and dropped
before faulting.
> diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
> index 4e9542aedc253..119e70dbca56f 100644
> --- a/mm/hmm.c
> +++ b/mm/hmm.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -305,14 +360,25 @@ static int hmm_vma_handle_pte(struct mm_walk *walk, unsigned long addr,
> goto fault;
>
> if (softleaf_is_migration(entry)) {
> - pte_unmap(ptep);
> - hmm_vma_walk->last = addr;
> - migration_entry_wait(walk->mm, pmdp, addr);
> - return -EBUSY;
> + if (!hmm_select_migrate(range)) {
> + HMM_ASSERT_UNLOCKED(hmm_vma_walk);
> + pte_unmap(ptep);
> + hmm_vma_walk->last = addr;
> + migration_entry_wait(walk->mm, pmdp, addr);
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> + return 0;
> }
[Severity: High]
In include/linux/hmm.h, the input request flags share the same bit positions
as the output flags (HMM_PFN_REQ_FAULT == HMM_PFN_VALID,
HMM_PFN_REQ_WRITE == HMM_PFN_WRITE, HMM_PFN_REQ_MIGRATE == HMM_PFN_MIGRATE),
and callers using range->default_flags with range->pfn_flags_mask == 0 are
not required to initialize range->hmm_pfns[] on input.
In hmm_vma_handle_pte(), the !pte_present(pte) path evaluates
required_fault = hmm_pte_need_fault(hmm_vma_walk, pfn_req_flags, 0) first:
required_fault =
hmm_pte_need_fault(hmm_vma_walk, pfn_req_flags, 0);
if (!required_fault)
goto out;
Because of that check, if (softleaf_is_migration(entry)) is only reached when
required_fault != 0 (HMM_PFN_REQ_FAULT was requested). When
hmm_select_migrate(range) is non-zero, returning 0 directly here skips both
migration_entry_wait() (which would require unlocking hmm_vma_walk->ptl first)
and the out: label that masks *hmm_pfn to HMM_PFN_INOUT_FLAGS:
out:
*hmm_pfn = (*hmm_pfn & HMM_PFN_INOUT_FLAGS) | new_pfn_flags;
return 0;
Won't returning 0 directly on a concurrent migration entry leave stale input
flags or uninitialized bits (such as HMM_PFN_REQ_FAULT / HMM_PFN_VALID and
HMM_PFN_REQ_MIGRATE / HMM_PFN_MIGRATE) in *hmm_pfn, pass a migration PTE into
hmm_vma_handle_migrate_prepare(), and allow hmm_range_fault() to succeed
without waiting for the migration entry to resolve despite HMM_PFN_REQ_FAULT?
Conversely, when HMM_PFN_REQ_FAULT is not set (such as the default in
migrate_vma_setup()), if (!required_fault) goto out runs before checking
softleaf_is_migration(entry). If a retry re-walks a migration PTE that was
already installed by this walk, won't jumping to out: clear *hmm_pfn (and
trigger rollback in the later patch "mm/hmm: implement rollback for device
page migration in HMM pagewalk") while leaving the migration PTE in the page
table?
[ ... ]
> @@ -468,46 +593,116 @@ static int hmm_vma_walk_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp,
> {
> struct hmm_vma_walk *hmm_vma_walk = walk->private;
> struct hmm_range *range = hmm_vma_walk->range;
> - unsigned long *hmm_pfns =
> - &range->hmm_pfns[(start - range->start) >> PAGE_SHIFT];
> unsigned long npages = (end - start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + struct mm_struct *mm = walk->vma->vm_mm;
> + unsigned long *hmm_pfns, *hmm_pfns_start;
> + enum migrate_vma_info minfo;
> unsigned long addr = start;
> + bool unmapped = false;
> + unsigned long i;
> pte_t *ptep;
> pmd_t pmd;
> + int r = 0;
>
> + minfo = hmm_select_migrate(range);
> + hmm_pfns_start = &range->hmm_pfns[(start - range->start) >> PAGE_SHIFT];
> again:
> - pmd = pmdp_get_lockless(pmdp);
> - if (pmd_none(pmd))
> - return hmm_vma_walk_hole(start, end, -1, walk);
> + hmm_pfns = &range->hmm_pfns[(addr - range->start) >> PAGE_SHIFT];
> + hmm_vma_walk->ptelocked = false;
> + hmm_vma_walk->pmdlocked = false;
> +
> + if (minfo) {
> + hmm_vma_walk->ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pmdp);
> + hmm_vma_walk->pmdlocked = true;
> + pmd = pmdp_get(pmdp);
> + } else
> + pmd = pmdp_get_lockless(pmdp);
> +
> + if (pmd_none(pmd)) {
> + r = hmm_vma_walk_hole(start, end, -1, walk);
> +
> + if (hmm_vma_walk->pmdlocked) {
> + spin_unlock(hmm_vma_walk->ptl);
> + hmm_vma_walk->pmdlocked = false;
> + }
> + return r;
> + }
>
> if (thp_migration_supported() && pmd_is_migration_entry(pmd)) {
> - if (hmm_range_need_fault(hmm_vma_walk, hmm_pfns, npages, 0)) {
> - hmm_vma_walk->last = addr;
> - pmd_migration_entry_wait(walk->mm, pmdp);
> - return -EBUSY;
> + if (!minfo) {
> + if (hmm_range_need_fault(hmm_vma_walk, hmm_pfns_start, npages, 0)) {
> + hmm_vma_walk->last = addr;
> + pmd_migration_entry_wait(walk->mm, pmdp);
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> + for (i = 0; start < end; start += PAGE_SIZE, i++)
> + hmm_pfns_start[i] &= HMM_PFN_INOUT_FLAGS;
> + }
> +
> + if (hmm_vma_walk->pmdlocked) {
> + spin_unlock(hmm_vma_walk->ptl);
> + hmm_vma_walk->pmdlocked = false;
> }
> - return hmm_pfns_fill(start, end, range, 0);
> +
> + return 0;
> }
[Severity: High]
Similarly, in hmm_vma_walk_pmd(), when thp_migration_supported() &&
pmd_is_migration_entry(pmd) is true and minfo != 0, both the
hmm_range_need_fault() check and the loop masking hmm_pfns_start[] to
HMM_PFN_INOUT_FLAGS are skipped by if (!minfo).
When a concurrent PMD migration entry is encountered during a migration walk,
doesn't skipping that block leave hmm_pfns_start[0..npages - 1] unmasked and
uninitialized, and also fail to unlock hmm_vma_walk->ptl and wait in
pmd_migration_entry_wait() when a fault was requested? Neither this path nor
the PTE migration entry path in hmm_vma_handle_pte() appears to be updated in
the subsequent patches in the series.
> - if (!pmd_present(pmd))
> - return hmm_vma_handle_absent_pmd(walk, start, end, hmm_pfns,
> - pmd);
> + if (pmd_trans_huge(pmd) || !pmd_present(pmd)) {
> + if (!pmd_present(pmd)) {
> + r = hmm_vma_handle_absent_pmd(walk, start, end, hmm_pfns_start,
> + pmd);
> + // If not migrating we are done
> + if (r || !minfo) {
> + if (hmm_vma_walk->pmdlocked) {
> + spin_unlock(hmm_vma_walk->ptl);
> + hmm_vma_walk->pmdlocked = false;
> + }
> + return r;
> + }
> + }
>
> - if (pmd_trans_huge(pmd)) {
> - /*
> - * No need to take pmd_lock here, even if some other thread
> - * is splitting the huge pmd we will get that event through
> - * mmu_notifier callback.
> - *
> - * So just read pmd value and check again it's a transparent
> - * huge or device mapping one and compute corresponding pfn
> - * values.
> - */
> - pmd = pmdp_get_lockless(pmdp);
> - if (!pmd_trans_huge(pmd))
> - goto again;
> + if (pmd_trans_huge(pmd)) {
> + /*
> + * No need to take pmd_lock here if not migrating,
> + * even if some other thread is splitting the huge
> + * pmd we will get that event through mmu_notifier callback.
> + *
> + * So just read pmd value and check again it's a transparent
> + * huge or device mapping one and compute corresponding pfn
> + * values.
> + */
> +
> + if (!minfo) {
> + pmd = pmdp_get_lockless(pmdp);
> + if (!pmd_trans_huge(pmd))
> + goto again;
> + }
>
> - return hmm_vma_handle_pmd(walk, addr, end, hmm_pfns, pmd);
> + r = hmm_vma_handle_pmd(walk, start, end, hmm_pfns_start, pmd);
> +
> + // If not migrating we are done
> + if (r || !minfo) {
> + if (hmm_vma_walk->pmdlocked) {
> + spin_unlock(hmm_vma_walk->ptl);
> + hmm_vma_walk->pmdlocked = false;
> + }
> + return r;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + r = hmm_vma_handle_migrate_prepare_pmd(walk, pmdp, start, end, hmm_pfns_start);
> +
> + if (hmm_vma_walk->pmdlocked) {
> + spin_unlock(hmm_vma_walk->ptl);
> + hmm_vma_walk->pmdlocked = false;
> + }
> +
> + return r;
> + }
> +
> + if (hmm_vma_walk->pmdlocked) {
> + spin_unlock(hmm_vma_walk->ptl);
> + hmm_vma_walk->pmdlocked = false;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -517,24 +712,64 @@ static int hmm_vma_walk_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp,
> * recover.
> */
> if (pmd_bad(pmd)) {
> - if (hmm_range_need_fault(hmm_vma_walk, hmm_pfns, npages, 0))
> + if (hmm_range_need_fault(hmm_vma_walk, hmm_pfns_start, npages, 0))
> return -EFAULT;
> - return hmm_pfns_fill(start, end, range, HMM_PFN_ERROR);
> + return hmm_pfns_fill(start, end, hmm_vma_walk, HMM_PFN_ERROR);
> }
>
> - ptep = pte_offset_map(pmdp, addr);
> - if (!ptep)
> + if (minfo) {
> + ptep = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmdp, addr, &hmm_vma_walk->ptl);
> + if (ptep)
> + hmm_vma_walk->ptelocked = true;
> + } else {
> + ptep = pte_offset_map(pmdp, addr);
> + }
> + if (!ptep) {
> + addr = start;
> goto again;
> + }
> +
> for (; addr < end; addr += PAGE_SIZE, ptep++, hmm_pfns++) {
> - int r;
>
> r = hmm_vma_handle_pte(walk, addr, end, pmdp, ptep, hmm_pfns);
> if (r) {
> - /* hmm_vma_handle_pte() did pte_unmap() */
> + /* hmm_vma_handle_pte() did pte_unmap() / pte_unmap_unlock */
> + if (unmapped)
> + flush_tlb_range(walk->vma, start, addr);
> return r;
> }
> +
> + r = hmm_vma_handle_migrate_prepare(walk, pmdp, ptep, addr, hmm_pfns, &unmapped);
> + if (r == -EAGAIN) {
> + HMM_ASSERT_UNLOCKED(hmm_vma_walk);
> + if (unmapped) {
> + flush_tlb_range(walk->vma, start, addr);
> + unmapped = false;
> + }
> + goto again;
> + }
[Severity: High]
When hmm_vma_handle_migrate_prepare() (populated in the later patch "mm/hmm:
migrate collection in HMM pagewalk - pte level") encounters a PTE-mapped large
folio at addr > start after order-0 pages in [start, addr) have already been
collected, migrate_vma_split_folio() drops the PTE lock and returns -EAGAIN,
jumping to again: with addr > start.
Even with the later patch "mm/hmm: implement rollback for device page
migration in HMM pagewalk", can jumping back to again: with addr > start leave
stale collected state in [start, addr) or leak folio locks and references?
1. If pte_offset_map_lock() returns null (!ptep) at addr > start because the
PTE table disappeared while the PTE lock was dropped, the rollback patch
calls hmm_vma_handle_migrate_prepare_rollback(walk->private, addr, end,
hmm_pfns) on the unwalked tail [addr, end) instead of rolling back the
already-collected prefix [start, addr) at hmm_pfns_start before resetting
addr = start.
2. If the PTE page table was removed or replaced while the PTE lock was
dropped in migrate_vma_split_folio() (or after !ptep jumps to again:), the
PMD-level paths at again: do not roll back [start, addr) when
pmd_is_migration_entry(pmd) is true (which returns 0 with [start, addr)
still marked HMM_PFN_VALID | HMM_PFN_MIGRATE and addr still marked
HMM_PFN_VALID from hmm_vma_handle_pte()), or when hmm_vma_walk_hole(),
hmm_vma_handle_absent_pmd(), hmm_vma_handle_pmd(), or pmd_bad() returns
HMM_FAULT_PENDING or -EFAULT. Likewise, if the PTE table was replaced by a
new PTE table while the lock was dropped, again: resumes at addr > start
without rolling back or re-walking [start, addr).
> + if (r) {
> + /* A non -EAGAIN error here means migrate_vma_split_folio()
> + * already dropped the PTE lock and cleared ptelocked.
> + */
> + HMM_ASSERT_UNLOCKED(hmm_vma_walk);
> + if (unmapped)
> + flush_tlb_range(walk->vma, start, addr);
> + hmm_pfns_fill(addr, end, hmm_vma_walk, HMM_PFN_ERROR);
> + return 0;
> + }
[Severity: Medium]
When hmm_vma_handle_migrate_prepare() returns a non-EAGAIN error in the later
patch "mm/hmm: migrate collection in HMM pagewalk - pte level" because
migrate_vma_split_folio() failed to split a PTE-mapped large folio, why does
hmm_vma_walk_pmd() fill [addr, end) with HMM_PFN_ERROR and return 0?
First, hmm_vma_handle_pte() has already recorded the valid PFN and
HMM_PFN_VALID in *hmm_pfns for addr. Overwriting addr with HMM_PFN_ERROR means
callers such as nouveau_dmem_migrate_fault() (in "drm/nouveau/svm: add support
for migrate on fault") that fall back to mapping present CPU pages in place
when migration does not happen cannot use the PFN, unlike folio_trylock() or
folio_try_share_anon_rmap_pte() failures which preserve the valid PFN without
HMM_PFN_MIGRATE.
Second, returning 0 immediately aborts the loop for the rest of the PMD range
[addr + PAGE_SIZE, end), skipping both faulting (hmm_vma_handle_pte()) and
migration collection (hmm_vma_handle_migrate_prepare()) for all remaining PTEs
in that PMD and returning 0 from hmm_range_fault() with HMM_PFN_ERROR entries
even when HMM_PFN_REQ_FAULT was requested.
> }
> - pte_unmap(ptep - 1);
> +
> + if (unmapped)
> + flush_tlb_range(walk->vma, start, addr);
> +
> + if (hmm_vma_walk->ptelocked) {
> + pte_unmap_unlock(ptep - 1, hmm_vma_walk->ptl);
> + hmm_vma_walk->ptelocked = false;
> + } else {
> + pte_unmap(ptep - 1);
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261021060506.2377545-1-mpenttil@redhat.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-22 6:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-21 6:04 [PATCH v16 00/12] migrate on fault for device pages mpenttil
2026-10-21 6:04 ` [PATCH v16 01/12] mm/Kconfig: changes for " mpenttil
2026-10-21 6:04 ` [PATCH v16 02/12] mm: add helper to convert HMM pfn to migrate pfn mpenttil
2026-10-21 6:04 ` [PATCH v16 03/12] mm/hmm: preparations for HMM to participate in migration mpenttil
2026-10-21 7:17 ` Balbir Singh
2026-10-21 8:11 ` Mika Penttilä
2026-10-22 6:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 6:04 ` [PATCH v16 04/12] mm/hmm: do the plumbing " mpenttil
2026-10-22 6:06 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-21 6:04 ` [PATCH v16 05/12] mm/hmm: migrate collection in HMM pagewalk - pte level mpenttil
2026-10-21 6:56 ` Balbir Singh
2026-10-21 7:09 ` Mika Penttilä
2026-10-22 6:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 6:05 ` [PATCH v16 06/12] mm/hmm: migrate collection in HMM pagewalk - pmd level mpenttil
2026-10-22 6:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 6:05 ` [PATCH v16 07/12] mm/hmm: add lazy MMU mode support for migration in HMM pagewalk mpenttil
2026-10-21 6:05 ` [PATCH v16 08/12] mm/hmm: implement rollback for device page " mpenttil
2026-10-22 6:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 6:05 ` [PATCH v16 09/12] mm: enable device page migration from " mpenttil
2026-10-21 6:19 ` Balbir Singh
2026-10-21 6:30 ` Mika Penttilä
2026-10-22 6:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 6:05 ` [PATCH v16 10/12] lib/test_hmm: add a new testcase for the migrate on fault mpenttil
2026-10-22 6:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 6:05 ` [PATCH v16 11/12] Documentation/mm/hmm: document migration through hmm_range_fault() mpenttil
2026-10-22 6:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 6:05 ` [PATCH v16 12/12] drm/nouveau/svm: add support for migrate on fault mpenttil
2026-10-22 6:06 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-181052@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mpenttil@redhat.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox