From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Gregory Price (Meta)" <gourry@gourry.net>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, vbabka@kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
mhocko@suse.com, brendan.jackman@linux.dev, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
ziy@nvidia.com, linmiaohe@huawei.com, nao.horiguchi@gmail.com,
david@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org, liam@infradead.org,
rppt@kernel.org, osalvador@suse.de, muchun.song@linux.dev,
iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] mm/compaction: wait for pfn walkers before poisoning offlined memmap
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 04:22:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-187473@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261027042204.3741307-2-gourry@gourry.net>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] mm/compaction: clamping low_pfn in isolate_migratepages() loops forever
- [High] mm: race in pageblock_pfn_to_page() with move_pfn_range_to_zone() onlining
- [Medium] mm: pfn_walk_srcu is disabled when CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE=n
--
commit 6ad7c6454b21a8c91c2521a8135b38b5d2766881
Author: Gregory Price (Meta) <gourry@gourry.net>
mm/compaction: wait for pfn walkers before poisoning offlined memmap
This patch introduces an SRCU-fast read section around compaction PFN walks
and waits for readers in remove_pfn_range_from_zone() before poisoning
offlined memmap pages. It also updates pageblock_pfn_to_page() and
isolate_migratepages() to handle zone span changes across memory offlining.
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index f1b2060eb2016..2aeb18b6d54dd 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2116,6 +2121,9 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc)
> */
> fast_find_block = low_pfn != cc->migrate_pfn && !cc->fast_search_fail;
>
> + /* Offline may have shrunk the zone start past an old migrate_pfn */
> + low_pfn = max(low_pfn, block_start_pfn);
> +
> /* Only scan within a pageblock boundary */
> block_end_pfn = pageblock_end_pfn(low_pfn);
[Severity: High]
Can clamping low_pfn to block_start_pfn without updating cc->migrate_pfn
cause compact_zone() to enter an unbounded infinite loop?
If memory offlining shrinks cc->zone->zone_start_pfn upward via
offline_pages() -> remove_pfn_range_from_zone() -> shrink_zone_span() while
compaction is running, cc->migrate_pfn can sit below the new
cc->zone->zone_start_pfn while cc->free_pfn is either also in the offlined
lower range (with cc->migrate_pfn < cc->free_pfn) or in the first pageblock
of the new zone start (where block_end_pfn > cc->free_pfn).
In isolate_migratepages() in mm/compaction.c, clamping low_pfn to
block_start_pfn advances block_end_pfn = pageblock_end_pfn(low_pfn) past
cc->free_pfn, so the pageblock loop is skipped completely:
for (; block_end_pfn <= cc->free_pfn;
fast_find_block = false,
cc->migrate_pfn = low_pfn = block_end_pfn,
block_start_pfn = block_end_pfn,
block_end_pfn += pageblock_nr_pages) {
Because the loop does not execute, isolate_migratepages() returns
ISOLATE_NONE without advancing cc->migrate_pfn or calling cond_resched().
Back in compact_zone(), compact_finished() -> __compact_finished() checks
compact_scanners_met(cc):
static inline bool compact_scanners_met(struct compact_control *cc)
{
return (cc->free_pfn >> pageblock_order)
<= (cc->migrate_pfn >> pageblock_order);
}
Since cc->migrate_pfn was never updated to low_pfn, compact_scanners_met(cc)
remains false and __compact_finished() returns COMPACT_CONTINUE (even
before checking fatal_signal_pending(current) when is_via_compact_memory()
or !pageblock_aligned(cc->migrate_pfn) holds), causing compact_zone() to
spin forever on ISOLATE_NONE without rescheduling.
Should cc->migrate_pfn also be updated when low_pfn is clamped to
block_start_pfn?
> diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
> index 3a402e735dbe2..fdc83a7aafb51 100644
> --- a/mm/internal.h
> +++ b/mm/internal.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> #include <linux/rmap.h>
> #include <linux/swap.h>
> #include <linux/leafops.h>
> +#include <linux/srcu.h>
> #include <linux/tracepoint-defs.h>
>
> /* Internal core VMA manipulation functions. */
> @@ -1208,6 +1209,46 @@ struct tlbflush_unmap_batch;
> */
> extern struct workqueue_struct *mm_percpu_wq;
>
> +/*
> + * Compaction checks that a pageblock is online and then uses its pages,
> + * possibly across sleeps. remove_pfn_range_from_zone() waits for these
> + * readers before it poisons the memmap of a range taken offline.
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +extern struct srcu_struct pfn_walk_srcu;
[Severity: Medium]
Should pfn_walk_srcu be guarded by CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG rather than
CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE?
When CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG=y, CONFIG_MHP_MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY=y, and
CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE=n, pfn_walk_lock(), pfn_walk_unlock(), and
pfn_walk_synchronize() compile to no-ops.
However, during memory_block_online() in drivers/base/memory.c:
if (nr_vmemmap_pages) {
ret = mhp_init_memmap_on_memory(start_pfn, nr_vmemmap_pages, zone);
if (ret)
goto out;
}
ret = online_pages(start_pfn + nr_vmemmap_pages,
nr_pages - nr_vmemmap_pages, zone, mem->group);
if (ret) {
if (nr_vmemmap_pages)
mhp_deinit_memmap_on_memory(start_pfn, nr_vmemmap_pages);
goto out;
}
If nr_vmemmap_pages >= PAGES_PER_SECTION, mhp_init_memmap_on_memory() in
mm/memory_hotplug.c marks full vmemmap sections online via
online_mem_sections() before online_pages() runs. If online_pages() then
fails, mhp_deinit_memmap_on_memory() calls offline_mem_sections() and
remove_pfn_range_from_zone(), which poisons the struct pages without waiting
for concurrent compaction pfn_walk readers when CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE=n.
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.h b/mm/page_alloc.h
> index 2b1017a91928c..3446a2ebdd0f2 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.h
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.h
> @@ -216,7 +216,12 @@ extern struct page *__pageblock_pfn_to_page(unsigned long start_pfn,
> static inline struct page *pageblock_pfn_to_page(unsigned long start_pfn,
> unsigned long end_pfn, struct zone *zone)
> {
> - if (zone->contiguous)
> + /*
> + * Offline can shrink the zone under a caller's old pfns and then set
> + * zone->contiguous again, so only trust it inside the current span.
> + */
> + if (smp_load_acquire(&zone->contiguous) &&
> + zone_spans_pfn(zone, start_pfn) && zone_spans_pfn(zone, end_pfn - 1))
> return pfn_to_page(start_pfn);
>
> return __pageblock_pfn_to_page(start_pfn, end_pfn, zone);
[Severity: High]
Can pageblock_pfn_to_page() race with move_pfn_range_to_zone() during memory
onlining and return poisoned struct pages through the zone->contiguous fast
path?
When a boundary range is offlined by remove_pfn_range_from_zone(), its
struct pages are poisoned, the zone span shrinks, and set_zone_contiguous()
sets zone->contiguous = true for the remaining span.
When that range (or a newly hot-added range) is later onlined via
online_pages() -> move_pfn_range_to_zone() in mm/memory_hotplug.c:
clear_zone_contiguous(zone);
if (zone_is_empty(zone))
init_currently_empty_zone(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
resize_zone_range(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
resize_pgdat_range(pgdat, start_pfn, nr_pages);
...
memmap_init_range(nr_pages, nid, zone_idx(zone), start_pfn, 0,
MEMINIT_HOTPLUG, altmap, migratetype,
isolate_pageblock);
move_pfn_range_to_zone() clears zone->contiguous first (with a plain store
and no barrier or grace period) and then expands zone->zone_start_pfn and
zone->spanned_pages in resize_zone_range() before memmap_init_range()
reinitializes the poisoned struct pages and before the sections are marked
online.
Because pageblock_pfn_to_page() also loads zone->contiguous first and checks
zone_spans_pfn() second, a concurrent reader in pageblock_pfn_to_page() can
load zone->contiguous == true right before clear_zone_contiguous(zone), and
then observe the newly expanded zone_start_pfn / spanned_pages from
resize_zone_range() while memmap_init_range() is still running (or observe
the stores out of order on weakly ordered architectures), bypassing
__pageblock_pfn_to_page() on offline poisoned pages.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261027042204.3741307-1-gourry@gourry.net?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-28 4:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-27 4:21 [PATCH 0/6] mm: fix pfn walker races with memory offline Gregory Price (Meta)
2026-10-27 4:21 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm/compaction: wait for pfn walkers before poisoning offlined memmap Gregory Price (Meta)
2026-10-27 13:38 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-10-28 4:22 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-27 4:22 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm/page_owner: hold off memory offline while a page is read Gregory Price (Meta)
2026-10-28 4:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-27 4:22 ` [PATCH 3/6] mm/memory-failure: keep the page online while handling it Gregory Price (Meta)
2026-10-27 4:22 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm/page_alloc: don't undo another isolation in alloc_contig_range Gregory Price (Meta)
2026-10-27 13:37 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-10-27 14:06 ` Gregory Price (Meta)
2026-10-27 14:13 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-10-27 18:53 ` Zi Yan
2026-10-27 18:58 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-10-27 19:38 ` Gregory Price
2026-10-27 4:22 ` [PATCH 5/6] mm/page_alloc: keep the range online while alloc_contig isolates it Gregory Price (Meta)
2026-10-27 4:22 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm/hwpoison-inject: keep the page online while filtering it Gregory Price (Meta)
2026-10-27 8:57 ` [PATCH 0/6] mm: fix pfn walker races with memory offline David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-10-27 11:31 ` Gregory Price (Meta)
2026-10-27 12:51 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-10-27 13:49 ` Gregory Price (Meta)
2026-10-27 14:25 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-10-27 15:49 ` Gregory Price (Meta)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-187473@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=brendan.jackman@linux.dev \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox