From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Baoquan He" <baoquan.he@linux.dev>,
"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
"Pasha Tatashin" <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
"Pratyush Yadav" <pratyush@kernel.org>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>, "Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
"Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"Steven Price" <steven.price@arm.com>,
"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
"Suzuki K Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@kernel.org>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"Benjamin Gaignard" <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>,
"Brian Starkey" <Brian.Starkey@arm.com>,
"John Stultz" <jstultz@google.com>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Radu Rendec" <radu@rendec.net>,
"T.J. Mercier" <tjmercier@google.com>,
"Madhavan Srinivasan" <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com>,
"Christophe Leroy" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
"Ritesh Harjani" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
"Shrikanth Hegde" <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Gerald Schaefer" <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
"Sven Schnelle" <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Kiryl Shutsemau" <kas@kernel.org>,
"Rick Edgecombe" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
"K . Y . Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
"Haiyang Zhang" <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
"Wei Liu" <wei.liu@kernel.org>,
"Dexuan Cui" <decui@microsoft.com>,
"Long Li" <longli@microsoft.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Vitaly Kuznetsov" <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, "Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>,
media-ci@linuxtv.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 02/14] mm: Zero memory during shared memory transitions
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2026 16:52:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-199540@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261104164555.3555725-3-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 5 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] x86/hyperv: premature zeroing in hv_vtom_clear_present() before transition
- [High] Drivers: hv: uninitialized SynIC pages in hv_alloc_page() on non-CoCo VMs
- [High] dma-pool: dirty cache lines left on linear alias by set_memory_decrypted()
- [Medium] x86/mm: set_memory_decrypted() zeroes legacy VGA VRAM/MMIO in VGA_MAP_MEM()
- [Medium] powerpc/pseries/svm: set_memory_decrypted() zeroes private page before sharing
--
commit 0a47431deefcabfb66f48104fa0c06cece49f6f0
Author: Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
mm: Zero memory during shared memory transitions
This commit moves memory zeroing into the architecture-specific
implementations of set_memory_decrypted() so each platform clears shared
memory at the appropriate point in the private-to-shared transition. It
also removes post-transition memset() calls from callers and keeps explicit
zeroing on paths where no transition takes place.
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/svm.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/svm.c
> index 7a403dbd35ee5..a344e094fe1c8 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/svm.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -59,6 +60,7 @@ int set_memory_decrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages)
> if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(addr))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + memset((void *)addr, 0, (size_t)numpages << PAGE_SHIFT);
> uv_share_page(PHYS_PFN(__pa(addr)), numpages);
>
> return 0;
[Severity: Medium]
Should the memset() in set_memory_decrypted() happen after uv_share_page()
rather than before it?
On PowerPC pSeries Secure VMs, memory is partitioned between secure memory
and normal hypervisor-accessible memory rather than shared in place. When
uv_share_page() is called, the Ultravisor unmaps the secure page and the
hypervisor sets pvt->skip_page_out = true in kvmppc_share_page() before
allocating a new normal page and mapping it into the guest:
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c:kvmppc_share_page() {
if (kvmppc_gfn_is_uvmem_pfn(gfn, kvm, &uvmem_pfn)) {
uvmem_page = pfn_to_page(uvmem_pfn);
pvt = uvmem_page->zone_device_data;
pvt->skip_page_out = true;
...
}
Zeroing addr before uv_share_page() writes zeros to the private secure page
that is immediately unmapped and discarded (and faults in a secure page first
if one was not yet populated), instead of zeroing the shared mapping after
the transition completes.
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/arch/x86/hyperv/ivm.c b/arch/x86/hyperv/ivm.c
> index 2ce4dfe534727..e9c7799a00943 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/hyperv/ivm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/hyperv/ivm.c
> @@ -755,6 +755,10 @@ static int hv_mark_gpa_visibility(u16 count, const u64 pfn[],
> */
> static int hv_vtom_clear_present(unsigned long kbuffer, int pagecount, bool enc)
> {
> + if (!enc)
> + memset((void *)kbuffer, 0,
> + (size_t)pagecount << PAGE_SHIFT);
> +
> return set_memory_np(kbuffer, pagecount);
> }
[Severity: Critical]
As reported by Sashiko on RFC v8 [1], doesn't zeroing kbuffer in
hv_vtom_clear_present() clear the private mapping before the transition to
shared completes, leaving the final shared mapping unzeroed?
In hv_vtom_init(), hv_vtom_clear_present() is registered as
x86_platform.guest.enc_status_change_prepare, while
hv_vtom_set_host_visibility() is registered as
x86_platform.guest.enc_status_change_finish.
When set_memory_decrypted() runs on Hyper-V Isolation VMs using vTOM or a
paravisor, __set_memory_enc_pgtable() invokes the callbacks in this order:
__set_memory_enc_pgtable()
-> hv_vtom_clear_present() (prepare: kbuffer is still private)
-> __change_page_attr_set_clr() (updates PTEs with shared_gpa_boundary)
-> hv_vtom_set_host_visibility() (finish: marks GPA host-visible and
restores _PAGE_PRESENT via
set_memory_p())
Because memset() runs in hv_vtom_clear_present() while kbuffer still maps the
encrypted/private GPA below ms_hyperv.shared_gpa_boundary, the shared mapping
above vTOM is never zeroed after hv_vtom_set_host_visibility() makes the
pages host-visible and present again. With the post-transition memset() calls
removed from callers such as vmbus_connect(), hv_alloc_page(),
dma_direct_alloc(), dma_direct_alloc_pages(), and
__alloc_cc_shared_pages_node(), shared buffers on vTOM VMs will contain
ciphertext or uninitialized data instead of zeros.
Should this memset() be moved to the end of hv_vtom_set_host_visibility()
after set_memory_p() succeeds?
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_amd.c b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_amd.c
> index 2f8c32173972d..a1199a74e9a3f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_amd.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_amd.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -308,6 +309,9 @@ static int amd_enc_status_change_finish(unsigned long vaddr, int npages, bool en
> if (!cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_MEM_ENCRYPT))
> enc_dec_hypercall(vaddr, npages << PAGE_SHIFT, enc);
>
> + if (!enc)
> + memset((void *)vaddr, 0, (size_t)npages << PAGE_SHIFT);
> +
> return 0;
> }
[Severity: Medium]
What happens during vgacon_startup() when VGA_MAP_MEM() calls
set_memory_decrypted() on the legacy VGA video memory range?
In arch/x86/include/asm/vga.h, VGA_MAP_MEM() calls set_memory_decrypted() on
the direct-map address of legacy VGA memory (0xb8000 or 0xb0000):
#define VGA_MAP_MEM(x, s) \
({ \
unsigned long start = (unsigned long)phys_to_virt(x); \
\
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT)) \
set_memory_decrypted(start, (s) >> PAGE_SHIFT); \
\
start; \
})
During console initialization, con_init() -> vgacon_startup() calls
VGA_MAP_MEM(vga_vram_base, vga_vram_size) before probing for VGA hardware and
before vgacon_save_screen() saves the pre-boot screen contents.
With amd_enc_status_change_finish() and tdx_enc_status_change_finish() now
unconditionally calling memset() on !enc:
1. On AMD SME/SEV, set_memory_decrypted() wipes the 32 KiB VGA text buffer
before vgacon_startup() checks the buffer or saves the initial screen.
2. On AMD SEV-ES/SEV-SNP and Intel TDX guests, 0xb8000-0xbffff is an MMIO
range; executing memset() (which uses rep stosb when X86_FEATURE_FSRS is
set) on that shared MMIO range triggers a #VC or #VE exception that
insn_decode_mmio() cannot decode, panicking the kernel at boot.
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/hv/hv.c b/drivers/hv/hv.c
> index fe50090dcc011..6e836a02910a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/hv/hv.c
> +++ b/drivers/hv/hv.c
> @@ -123,12 +123,13 @@ static int hv_alloc_page(void **page, bool decrypt, const char *note)
> if (!*page)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - if (decrypt)
> + if (decrypt) {
> ret = set_memory_decrypted((unsigned long)*page, 1);
> - if (ret)
> - goto failed;
> -
> - memset(*page, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
> + if (ret)
> + goto failed;
> + } else {
> + memset(*page, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
> + }
> return 0;
>
> failed:
[Severity: High]
As reported by Sashiko on RFC v8 [2], doesn't skipping memset() when decrypt
is true leave SynIC message and event pages uninitialized on standard
(non-CoCo) Hyper-V VMs?
In hv_synic_alloc(), decrypt is set to !vmbus_is_confidential():
drivers/hv/hv.c:hv_synic_alloc() {
const bool decrypt = !vmbus_is_confidential();
...
if (!ms_hyperv.paravisor_present && !hv_root_partition()) {
ret = hv_alloc_page(&hv_cpu->hyp_synic_message_page,
decrypt, "hypervisor SynIC msg");
if (ret)
goto err;
ret = hv_alloc_page(&hv_cpu->hyp_synic_event_page,
decrypt, "hypervisor SynIC event");
...
}
On a standard non-confidential Hyper-V guest, vmbus_is_confidential() is
false, so decrypt is true. However, on non-CoCo x86 and arm64 guests where
memory encryption is inactive, set_memory_decrypted() is a no-op that returns
0 without zeroing the page. Because hv_alloc_page() allocates the page with
__get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL) without __GFP_ZERO and skips the else branch when
decrypt is true, hyp_synic_message_page and hyp_synic_event_page are handed
to the hypervisor with uninitialized kernel memory, leaving non-zero garbage
in message slot headers (msg->header.message_type != HVMSG_NONE) and event
flags.
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/virt/coco/pkvm-guest/arm-pkvm-guest.c b/drivers/virt/coco/pkvm-guest/arm-pkvm-guest.c
> index 26fe9c3f22e36..7d922e0a28f96 100644
> --- a/drivers/virt/coco/pkvm-guest/arm-pkvm-guest.c
> +++ b/drivers/virt/coco/pkvm-guest/arm-pkvm-guest.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -61,6 +62,8 @@ static int pkvm_set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages)
>
> static int pkvm_set_memory_decrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages)
> {
> + memset((void *)addr, 0, (size_t)numpages << PAGE_SHIFT);
> +
> return __set_memory_range(ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_MEM_SHARE_FUNC_ID,
> addr, numpages);
> }
[Severity: High]
When atomic_pool_expand() expands a CoCo atomic DMA pool on arm64 (both here
in pkvm_set_memory_decrypted() and in realm_set_memory_decrypted()), doesn't
zeroing via the cacheable linear map allocate dirty cache lines after
arch_dma_prep_coherent() has already cleaned the cache?
In kernel/dma/pool.c:atomic_pool_expand(), arch_dma_prep_coherent() and the
non-cacheable vmap remap happen before set_memory_decrypted() is called on
page_to_virt(page):
kernel/dma/pool.c:atomic_pool_expand() {
...
arch_dma_prep_coherent(page, pool_size);
#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_DIRECT_REMAP
if (dma_pool->cc_shared)
prot = pgprot_decrypted(pgprot_dmacoherent(PAGE_KERNEL));
else
prot = pgprot_dmacoherent(PAGE_KERNEL);
addr = dma_common_contiguous_remap(page, pool_size, prot,
__builtin_return_address(0));
if (!addr)
goto free_page;
#else
addr = page_to_virt(page);
#endif
if (dma_pool->cc_shared) {
ret = set_memory_decrypted((unsigned long)page_to_virt(page),
1 << order);
...
}
Because pkvm_set_memory_decrypted() and realm_set_memory_decrypted() execute
memset() through the cacheable linear mapping page_to_virt(page) after
arch_dma_prep_coherent() has already run, dirty zeroed cache lines remain in
the CPU data cache for the linear alias while consumers of the atomic pool
access the buffer through the non-cacheable vmap alias addr or via device
DMA. If those dirty cache lines are later evicted, won't they overwrite data
written via the non-cacheable mapping or by DMA?
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260924100529.1398790-3-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260924100529.1398790-3-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261104164555.3555725-1-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-05 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-04 16:45 [PATCH v9 00/14] coco: guest: Add a shared-granule allocator for host-shared memory Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-11-04 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 01/14] mm: Add an allocator for CoCo shared memory Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-11-05 16:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 02/14] mm: Zero memory during shared memory transitions Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-11-05 16:52 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-04 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 03/14] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Resolve the default NUMA node explicitly Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-11-04 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 04/14] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Allocate shared tables using CoCo shared memory allocator Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-11-04 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 05/14] dma-contiguous: Derive shared alignment from DMA attributes Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-11-04 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 06/14] dma-pool: Allocate CoCo atomic pools using CoCo shared memory allocator Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-11-05 16:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 07/14] dma-direct: Align CoCo shared DMA allocations to the shared granule size Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-11-04 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 08/14] swiotlb: Align shared IO TLB pools " Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-11-05 16:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 09/14] swiotlb: Reject misaligned restricted DMA pools for CoCo guests Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-11-04 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 10/14] dma-buf: system_heap: Limit scatterlist entries to the buffer size Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-11-04 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 11/14] dma-buf: system_heap: Allocate shared buffers using CoCo shared memory allocator Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-11-04 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 12/14] swiotlb: Make rounded shared pool capacity allocatable Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-11-04 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 13/14] mm: Assert CoCo shared allocations may sleep Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-11-04 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 14/14] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Preallocate VPE L1 tables Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-11-05 16:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-11-05 16:52 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-199540@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Brian.Starkey@arm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
--cc=benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=longli@microsoft.com \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=media-ci@linuxtv.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=radu@rendec.net \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tjmercier@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox