From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: xu.xin@linux.dev, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: "Chengming Zhou" <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>,
"Lorenzo Stoakes" <lstoakes@gmail.com>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <liam.howlett@oracle.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, "Huan Yang" <link@vivo.com>,
"Wang Xiao" <xiao.wang@vivo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] ksm: add merge_only_zero_pages to merge only empty anonymous pages
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2026 03:49:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-202537@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106034841.233085-1-xu.xin@linux.dev>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Medium] mm: ksm: unsynchronized state checks in zero-page sysfs store
handlers
--
commit 9b8576e88012c85cc90e3b5aa732dfb204eefebc
Author: Xu Xin (vivo) <xu.xin@linux.dev>
ksm: add merge_only_zero_pages to merge only empty anonymous pages
This commit adds the /sys/kernel/mm/ksm/merge_only_zero_pages sysfs attribute
so ksmd can merge only zero-filled anonymous pages with the kernel zero page
while skipping the stable and unstable trees for pages carrying data.
> diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
> index 340c65aa14e58..35ed40747e30e 100644
> --- a/mm/ksm.c
> +++ b/mm/ksm.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -3679,12 +3695,48 @@ static ssize_t use_zero_pages_store(struct kobject *kobj,
> if (err)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + /*
> + * merge_only_zero_pages depends on use_zero_pages: refuse to turn
> + * the latter off while the former is active, so the two cannot
> + * silently diverge.
> + */
> + if (!value && ksm_merge_only_zero_pages)
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> ksm_use_zero_pages = value;
>
> return count;
> }
> KSM_ATTR(use_zero_pages);
>
> +static ssize_t merge_only_zero_pages_show(struct kobject *kobj,
> + struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", ksm_merge_only_zero_pages);
> +}
> +static ssize_t merge_only_zero_pages_store(struct kobject *kobj,
> + struct kobj_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + int err;
> + bool value;
> +
> + err = kstrtobool(buf, &value);
> + if (err)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (value && !ksm_use_zero_pages) {
> + pr_warn_once("ksm: merge_only_zero_pages can only be enabled "
> + "when use_zero_pages is 1\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + ksm_merge_only_zero_pages = value;
[Severity: Medium]
Can concurrent writes to use_zero_pages and merge_only_zero_pages cause
ksm_use_zero_pages and ksm_merge_only_zero_pages to diverge?
Since these are separate sysfs attributes, kernfs does not serialize
use_zero_pages_store() against merge_only_zero_pages_store(), and neither
handler takes ksm_thread_mutex or another shared lock.
Starting from ksm_use_zero_pages == true and ksm_merge_only_zero_pages ==
false, if one task writes 0 to use_zero_pages while another concurrently
writes 1 to merge_only_zero_pages:
CPU 0 CPU 1
use_zero_pages_store() merge_only_zero_pages_store()
if (!value && if (value &&
ksm_merge_only_zero_pages) !ksm_use_zero_pages)
/* sees false */ /* sees true */
ksm_use_zero_pages = false; ksm_merge_only_zero_pages = true;
With ksm_use_zero_pages set to false and ksm_merge_only_zero_pages set to
true, try_to_merge_with_zero_page() always returns -EFAULT and the
subsequent ksm_merge_only_zero_pages check in cmp_and_merge_page() returns
early:
mm/ksm.c:cmp_and_merge_page() {
...
if (!try_to_merge_with_zero_page(rmap_item, page))
return;
if (ksm_merge_only_zero_pages)
return;
...
}
Wouldn't this leave ksmd scanning and checksumming pages without ever
merging either zero pages or non-zero pages?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261106034841.233085-1-xu.xin@linux.dev?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-07 3:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-06 3:48 [PATCH resend] ksm: add merge_only_zero_pages to merge only empty anonymous pages xu.xin
2026-11-07 3:49 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-07 8:13 ` Jinjiang Tu
2026-11-07 18:28 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-202537@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=liam.howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=link@vivo.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xiao.wang@vivo.com \
--cc=xu.xin@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox