From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Mark Bundschuh" <mkbund@amazon.com>
Cc: sashal@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, david@kernel.org,
yangge <yangge1116@126.com>,
"Baolin Wang" <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Barry Song" <21cnbao@gmail.com>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
"SeongJae Park" <sj@kernel.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5.15 1/2] mm: replace free hugepage folios after migration
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2026 22:05:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-203352@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106220445.2859944-2-mkbund@amazon.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
issues to consider:
- [High] mm/hugetlb: isolated free pages in free_huge_pages break
reservations and offline
- [Low] mm: missing Fixes trailer on commit fixing hugetlb migration in
alloc_contig_range()
--
commit d4646288ad2f50427e782b8be06fdbc2d46b6d5b
Author: yangge <yangge1116@126.com>
mm: replace free hugepage folios after migration
This commit adds replace_free_hugepage_folios() after migrating in-use
hugetlb pages in alloc_contig_range() and skips MIGRATE_ISOLATE pages in
dequeue_huge_page_node_exact() so freed hugepages in the isolated range are
returned to the buddy allocator instead of being reused from the hugetlb
pool.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1734503588-16254-1-git-send-email-yangge1116@126.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1736582300-11364-1-git-send-email-yangge1116@126.com
[Severity: Low]
In the commit message, this is a bug fix for migrating in-use hugetlb pages
in alloc_contig_range(). Should it include:
Fixes: ae37c7ff79f1 ("mm: make alloc_contig_range handle in-use hugetlb pages")
[Severity: High]
In mm/hugetlb.c at line 1099, does skipping MIGRATE_ISOLATE pages in
dequeue_huge_page_node_exact() while still counting them in
h->free_huge_pages allow migration to consume non-isolated free pages
backing h->resv_huge_pages?
When an in-use hugepage inside an isolated range (from offline_pages() or
alloc_contig_range()) is migrated and freed back to h->hugepage_freelists,
it remains counted in h->free_huge_pages. On the next hugepage migration,
alloc_huge_page_nodemask() (mm/hugetlb.c, line 2184) sees
h->free_huge_pages - h->resv_huge_pages > 0, and
dequeue_huge_page_node_exact() skips the isolated free page and dequeues a
non-isolated free page that was needed to back h->resv_huge_pages.
Once the free pages backing h->resv_huge_pages have been swapped into the
MIGRATE_ISOLATE range (or accounted as available by gather_surplus_pages()
at mm/hugetlb.c, line 2231), dissolve_free_huge_page() (mm/hugetlb.c, line
1971) hits h->free_huge_pages - h->resv_huge_pages == 0 and fails
offline_pages() with -EBUSY after already shrinking h->max_huge_pages. In
addition, page faults on reserved hugetlb mappings fail in
alloc_huge_page() (mm/hugetlb.c, line 2836) with -ENOSPC (delivering SIGBUS)
when dequeue_huge_page_vma() skips the isolated pages and surplus allocation
is disallowed (such as when nr_overcommit_huge_pages is 0).
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261106220445.2859944-1-mkbund@amazon.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-07 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-05 7:02 [PATCH 5.15] mm: replace free hugepage folios after migration Mark Bundschuh
2026-11-06 7:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 7:46 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-06 22:04 ` [PATCH v2 5.15 0/2] " Mark Bundschuh
2026-11-06 22:04 ` [PATCH v2 5.15 1/2] " Mark Bundschuh
2026-11-07 22:05 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-06 22:04 ` [PATCH v2 5.15 2/2] mm/hugetlb: fix kernel NULL pointer dereference when replacing free hugetlb folios Mark Bundschuh
2026-11-07 22:05 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-203352@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mkbund@amazon.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=yangge1116@126.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox