From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Muchun Song" <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
"Oscar Salvador" <osalvador@suse.de>,
"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: "Lorenzo Stoakes" <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@kernel.org>,
"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Muchun Song" <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
"James Houghton" <jthoughton@google.com>,
"Lance Yang" <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
"Qi Zheng" <qi.zheng@linux.dev>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] mm/hugetlb: initialize all struct pages for bootmem hugepages
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2026 10:43:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-204840@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261109095807.41547-7-songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Low] mm/hugetlb: hugetlb_folio_init_vmemmap() wipes KMSAN metadata on
head page
--
commit e4e80712cfb9bd9a2f1df0a9b2aae1625edb6829
Author: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
mm/hugetlb: initialize all struct pages for bootmem hugepages
This commit marks the entire boot-time gigantic hugepage as noinit in
memblock and initializes the head struct page alongside the tail struct
pages in hugetlb_folio_init_vmemmap().
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index ff6f837b6df01..d2aaad235458e 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -3216,15 +3216,7 @@ static bool __init alloc_bootmem_huge_page(struct hstate *h, int nid)
> list_add_tail(&m->list, &huge_boot_pages[nid]);
> m->flags |= HUGE_BOOTMEM_ZONES_VALID;
> hugetlb_vmemmap_optimize_bootmem_page(pfn, huge_page_order(h));
> - /*
> - * Only initialize the head struct page in memmap_init_reserved_pages,
> - * rest of the struct pages will be initialized by the HugeTLB
> - * subsystem itself.
> - * The head struct page is used to get folio information by the HugeTLB
> - * subsystem like zone id and node id.
> - */
> - memblock_reserved_mark_noinit(__pa((void *)m + PAGE_SIZE),
> - huge_page_size(h) - PAGE_SIZE);
> + memblock_reserved_mark_noinit(__pa(m), huge_page_size(h));
> }
>
> return true;
> @@ -3255,22 +3247,23 @@ static void __init hugetlb_folio_init_tail_vmemmap(struct folio *folio,
> }
>
> static void __init hugetlb_folio_init_vmemmap(struct folio *folio,
> + unsigned long pfn,
> struct hstate *h,
> + enum zone_type zone, int nid,
> unsigned long nr_pages)
> {
> - int ret;
> + struct page *head = &folio->page;
>
> /*
> * This is an open-coded prep_compound_page() whereby we avoid
> * walking pages twice by initializing/preparing+freezing them in the
> * same go.
> */
> - __folio_clear_reserved(folio);
> + __init_single_page(head, pfn, zone, nid);
[Severity: Low]
Under CONFIG_KMSAN=y, does calling __init_single_page() on head here wipe
head->kmsan_shadow and head->kmsan_origin after kmsan_init_shadow() has
already populated them?
During mm_core_init(), kmsan_init_shadow() allocates and installs KMSAN
metadata for all memblock.reserved ranges, including MEMBLOCK_RSRV_NOINIT
regions:
mm/kmsan/init.c:kmsan_init_shadow() {
...
for_each_reserved_mem_range(loop, &p_start, &p_end)
kmsan_record_future_shadow_range(phys_to_virt(p_start),
phys_to_virt(p_end));
...
}
When page_alloc_init_late() later runs gather_bootmem_prealloc_node() ->
hugetlb_folio_init_vmemmap() -> __init_single_page() ->
memmap_init_page_common() -> mm_zero_struct_page(head) (and similarly via
memmap_init_compound_page_frozen() in commit "mm/hugetlb: use common
compound page initialization helper"), the entire struct page is zeroed,
leaking those shadow and origin pages and leaving head->kmsan_shadow and
head->kmsan_origin as NULL (extending the existing tail-page behavior in
hugetlb_folio_init_tail_vmemmap() to the head page).
If the bootmem gigantic folio is later freed to the buddy allocator at
runtime, kmsan_free_page() hits KMSAN_WARN_ON(true) and subsequent
allocations from the first pageblock cause a NULL pointer dereference in
kmsan_alloc_page().
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261109095807.41547-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-09 9:57 [PATCH 00/11] mm: Unify memmap initialization for compound pages Muchun Song
2026-11-09 9:57 ` [PATCH 01/11] mm/mm_init: verify zones for template-initialized pages Muchun Song
2026-11-09 9:57 ` [PATCH 02/11] mm/mm_init: factor out common struct page initialization Muchun Song
2026-11-09 10:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 3:08 ` Muchun Song
2026-11-09 9:57 ` [PATCH 03/11] mm/mm_init: simplify zone device " Muchun Song
2026-11-09 9:57 ` [PATCH 04/11] mm/mm_init: factor out frozen compound " Muchun Song
2026-11-09 9:58 ` [PATCH 05/11] mm/hugetlb: drop boot-time HVO handling for gigantic folios Muchun Song
2026-11-09 10:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 3:16 ` Muchun Song
2026-11-09 9:58 ` [PATCH 06/11] mm/hugetlb: initialize all struct pages for bootmem hugepages Muchun Song
2026-11-09 10:43 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-10 3:23 ` Muchun Song
2026-11-09 9:58 ` [PATCH 07/11] mm/hugetlb: use common compound page initialization helper Muchun Song
2026-11-09 9:58 ` [PATCH 08/11] mm/mm_init: make __init_single_page() static Muchun Song
2026-11-09 9:58 ` [PATCH 09/11] mm/cma: centralize CMA pageblock initialization Muchun Song
2026-11-09 9:58 ` [PATCH 10/11] mm/cma: localize init_cma_pageblock() to cma.c Muchun Song
2026-11-09 9:58 ` [PATCH 11/11] mm/mm_init: move pageblock migratetype init to memmap helpers Muchun Song
2026-11-09 10:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 3:55 ` Muchun Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-204840@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox