From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)" <kas@kernel.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>,
"Pedro Falcato" <pfalcato@suse.de>
Cc: "Lorenzo Stoakes" <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@kernel.org>,
"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
"Hugh Dickins" <hughd@google.com>,
"Chris Mason" <mason@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/memory: recheck PG_uptodate after ->page_mkwrite()
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 12:04:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-206973@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261109120403.82361-2-kas@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [High] mm/memory: PG_uptodate check in do_shared_fault() runs after
->page_mkwrite()
--
commit 700a620ccdd59b966f387e178bdcded1ac07e9a0
Author: Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta) <kas@kernel.org>
mm/memory: recheck PG_uptodate after ->page_mkwrite()
This commit rechecks whether a file folio is still uptodate in
do_shared_fault() after ->page_mkwrite() returns with the folio locked,
retrying the fault if PG_uptodate was cleared while the folio was unlocked.
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index fe72e66c9c2ee..cc1d0b7d15c75 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -6163,6 +6175,16 @@ static vm_fault_t do_shared_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> folio_put(folio);
> return tmp;
> }
> +
> + /*
> + * The folio was unlocked for ->page_mkwrite(). If it lost
> + * PG_uptodate meanwhile, retry the fault to read it in again.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(file_folio_not_uptodate(folio))) {
> + folio_unlock(folio);
> + folio_put(folio);
> + return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
> + }
> }
>
> ret |= finish_fault(vmf);
[Severity: High]
Does checking file_folio_not_uptodate(folio) after do_page_mkwrite() run too
late once ->page_mkwrite() has already dirtied the folio or set PG_uptodate
back on it?
In the race with ecryptfs_writepages(), writeback clears PG_dirty via
folio_clear_dirty_for_io() and then clears PG_uptodate when encryption fails.
When filemap_page_mkwrite() runs next, it relocks the folio, checks only
folio->mapping != mapping, and calls folio_mark_dirty():
mm/filemap.c:filemap_page_mkwrite() {
...
folio_lock(folio);
if (folio->mapping != mapping) {
folio_unlock(folio);
ret = VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
goto out;
}
/*
* We mark the folio dirty already here so that when freeze is in
* progress, we are guaranteed that writeback during freezing will
* see the dirty folio and writeprotect it again.
*/
folio_mark_dirty(folio);
...
}
Before returning to do_shared_fault(), folio_mark_dirty() ->
__folio_mark_dirty() triggers WARN_ON_ONCE(warn && !folio_test_uptodate(folio))
and tags the non-uptodate folio PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY. When do_shared_fault()
then aborts with VM_FAULT_NOPAGE, the non-uptodate folio is left unlocked and
dirty in the page cache, where writeback can pick it up again or reclaim
cannot evict it.
On filesystems whose ->page_mkwrite() goes through block_page_mkwrite() or
btrfs_page_mkwrite(), block_commit_write() and btrfs_folio_set_uptodate() set
PG_uptodate back on a full folio without reading from disk, so
file_folio_not_uptodate(folio) returns false and the invalidated folio is
still mapped into userspace.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261109120403.82361-1-kas@kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-09 12:04 [PATCH v2 0/2] mm/memory: refuse to map page cache folios that are not uptodate Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)
2026-11-09 12:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/memory: recheck PG_uptodate after ->page_mkwrite() Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)
2026-11-09 14:11 ` Pedro Falcato
2026-11-09 14:40 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-11-09 16:11 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-09 17:17 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-11-09 17:30 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-09 20:30 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-11-10 10:38 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-11-10 19:25 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-11-10 12:04 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-09 12:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/memory: refuse to map page cache folios that are not uptodate Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)
2026-11-09 14:13 ` Pedro Falcato
2026-11-10 12:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 8:05 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-11 18:13 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-206973@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mason@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox