Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Hamid Nassiby" <hamid.nassiby@nokia.com>
Cc: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Sasha Levin" <sashal@kernel.org>,
	"Ran Xiaokai" <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn>,
	ranxiaokai627@163.com,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
	"Oscar Salvador" <osalvador@suse.de>,
	"Mauricio Faria de Oliveira" <mfo@igalia.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.18.y] Revert "mm/page_owner: fix memory leak in page_owner_stack_fops->release()"
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 14:16:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-207182@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261109141527.2880867-1-hamid.nassiby@nokia.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Low] mm/page_owner: missing Fixes trailer for commit 05a8edf607be
--

commit 9eb622d1a73d326e41d0bbcc302c141ec9c886ab
Author: Hamid Nassiby <hamid.nassiby@nokia.com>

> Revert "mm/page_owner: fix memory leak in page_owner_stack_fops->release()"
>
> This reverts commit 05a8edf607be826738dfc620a17d9d98e8976762, which is
> commit a76a5ae2c6c6 upstream.
>
> The upstream change is only correct on top of commit 156c0c5d1463
> ("mm/page_owner: introduce struct stack_print_ctx"), which first appeared
> in v6.19. That commit makes page_owner_stack_open() allocate a struct
> stack_print_ctx through seq_open_private() and moves the stack_list
> cursor into it, so ->release() must free it with seq_release_private().
> 6.18 does not have that commit: page_owner_stack_open() passes a size of 0
> to seq_open_private(), so there is nothing to leak, and
> stack_start()/stack_next() store the current struct stack node directly
> in m->private.
>
> The upstream commit was backported because it is tagged for stable and
> carries a Fixes tag for 765973a09803 ("mm,page_owner: display all stacks
> and their count"), but the leak it fixes only exists since 156c0c5d1463.
>
> seq_release_private() kfree()s m->private. Closing show_stacks before
> EOF therefore frees a struct stack node that is still linked in
> stack_list, and the next reader of show_stacks walks into freed memory.
> On v6.18.60 (x86_64 QEMU, KASAN, page_owner=on), a single 4 KiB read()
> and close() followed by a full read gives:
>
>   BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in stack_print+0x165/0x170
>   Read of size 8 at addr ff110000062adfc0 by task init/1
>   ...
>   Allocated by task 1:
>    __kasan_kmalloc+0x7f/0x90
>    __set_page_owner+0x4a5/0x720
>   ...
>   Freed by task 1:
>    kfree+0xf8/0x460
>    seq_release_private+0x58/0x110
>    full_proxy_release+0xa1/0x130
>    __fput+0x35c/0xac0
>    __x64_sys_close+0x79/0xd0
>   ...
>   The buggy address belongs to the object at ff110000062adfc0
>    which belongs to the cache kmalloc-16 of size 16
>
> Without KASAN, the same bug panics arm64 hardware running a
> 6.12.108-based kernel ("head -12 show_stacks; cat show_stacks").
>
> With this revert applied, the QEMU reproducer completes 20
> partial-read/full-read cycles without a KASAN report. mm/page_owner.c is
> unchanged between v6.18.60 and v6.18.62.
>
> Backporting 156c0c5d1463 instead is not proposed: it prepares for the
> new show_handles and show_stacks_handles debugfs files rather than
> fixing anything, so reverting the backport is the minimal change for
> stable.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20260106170556.173097317@linuxfoundation.org/
> Signed-off-by: Hamid Nassiby <hamid.nassiby@nokia.com>

[Severity: Low]
Should this revert include a Fixes tag for the backported commit that
introduced the slab-use-after-free:

  Fixes: 05a8edf607be ("mm/page_owner: fix memory leak in page_owner_stack_fops->release()")

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261109141527.2880867-1-hamid.nassiby@nokia.com?part=1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-11-10 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-09 14:15 [PATCH 6.18.y] Revert "mm/page_owner: fix memory leak in page_owner_stack_fops->release()" Hamid Nassiby
2026-11-09 19:36 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2026-11-10 14:16 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-10 20:59 ` Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-207182@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hamid.nassiby@nokia.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mfo@igalia.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn \
    --cc=ranxiaokai627@163.com \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox