From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>, "Zi Yan" <ziy@nvidia.com>,
"Baolin Wang" <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
"Nico Pache" <nico.pache@linux.dev>,
"Ryan Roberts" <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
"Dev Jain" <dev.jain@arm.com>, "Barry Song" <baohua@kernel.org>,
"Lance Yang" <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
"Usama Arif" <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
"Kiryl Shutsemau" <kas@kernel.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mm/khugepaged: release contended mmap read lock after scanning enough VMAs
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 17:19:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-209401@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110-khugepaged-latency-fix-v3-3-6eea743cf9a3@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Low] mm/khugepaged: stale jiffies-based check description in commit
message
--
commit bce7aeac77f8f4e7344a0f568e13d01a781dac5f
Author: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
mm/khugepaged: release contended mmap read lock after scanning enough VMAs
This commit drops and reacquires the mmap read lock in
collapse_scan_mm_slot() if the lock is contended after walking a batch of
1024 VMAs.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261105-rwsem-dont-steal-from-queued-writer-v1-1-275e070f426f@kernel.org/
> Address this by checking whether the mmap lock is contended after 1-10
> ms (depending on CONFIG_HZ), i.e. the granularity of jiffies. This is a
> long time for a lock to be held, so is a reasonable compromise for
> determining when best to do this.
[Severity: Low]
Is this paragraph left over from an earlier jiffies-based version of the
patch? The code checks mmap_lock_is_contended() every
KHUGEPAGED_MAX_VMA_SCAN_BATCH (1024) VMAs, as described in the following
paragraph, rather than using jiffies.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261110-khugepaged-latency-fix-v3-0-6eea743cf9a3@kernel.org?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 17:19 [PATCH v3 0/3] mm/khugepaged: bound mmap_lock hold time when walking an mm's VMAs Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-10 17:19 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] Revert "mm/khugepaged: remove definition of struct khugepaged_mm_slot" Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-10 17:19 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/khugepaged: scan mm's more efficiently under mmap_lock contention Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-10 17:19 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] mm/khugepaged: release contended mmap read lock after scanning enough VMAs Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-10 19:09 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-12 9:26 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-11 9:27 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-11 9:30 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-11 17:19 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-12 9:39 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] mm/khugepaged: bound mmap_lock hold time when walking an mm's VMAs David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-209401@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=nico.pache@linux.dev \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox