From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Muchun Song" <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
"Oscar Salvador" <osalvador@suse.de>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Miaohe Lin" <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: "Muchun Song" <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
"Naoya Horiguchi" <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>,
"Joao Martins" <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Lorenzo Stoakes" <ljs@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mm/hugetlb_vmemmap: fix lost HWPoison state during optimization
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 22:38:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-209812@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261111093747.50048-2-songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Medium] mm/memory-failure: unserialized unpoison_memory() races with
HVO head remap
--
commit c0c1b7e9976626bf636152889fd9f5d88944d78b
Author: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
mm/hugetlb_vmemmap: fix lost HWPoison state during optimization
This commit introduces vmemmap_remap_rwsem to serialize HVO head page
remapping against HWPoison state updates in get_huge_page_for_hwpoison().
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index 78f0a13349cb3..164a02866fd59 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2038,6 +2039,7 @@ static int get_huge_page_for_hwpoison(unsigned long pfn, int flags,
> bool count_increased = false;
> int ret, rc;
>
> + guard(vmemmap_remap)();
> spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
> folio = page_folio(page);
> if (!folio_test_hugetlb(folio)) {
[Severity: Medium]
Does unpoison_memory() also need vmemmap_remap_rwsem when clearing
PG_hwpoison and freeing folio->_hugetlb_hwpoison?
If a newly initialized hugetlb folio is poisoned by a software-simulated
memory failure before HVO acquires vmemmap_remap_rwsem, unpoison_memory()
can race with the head page remap:
CPU0 CPU1
hugetlb_vmemmap_optimize_folio()
down_read(&vmemmap_remap_rwsem)
...
vmemmap_optimize_pte()
vmemmap_dup_page_from_list(old_head, ...)
unpoison_memory()
get_hwpoison_page(..., MF_UNPOISON)
folio_free_raw_hwp(old_head, false)
folio_test_clear_hwpoison(old_head)
set_pte_at(..., new_head)
flush_tlb_all()
/* new_head retains PG_hwpoison and
* freed _hugetlb_hwpoison pointer */
In get_hwpoison_hugetlb_folio(), passing unpoison == true takes the
folio_try_get(folio) branch even when !folio_test_hugetlb_migratable(folio),
returning 0 on the frozen folio instead of -EBUSY:
mm/hugetlb.c:get_hwpoison_hugetlb_folio() {
...
if (folio_test_hugetlb_freed(folio))
ret = 0;
else if (folio_test_hugetlb_migratable(folio) || unpoison)
ret = folio_try_get(folio);
else
ret = -EBUSY;
...
}
unpoison_memory() then sees ghp == 0 and calls folio_free_raw_hwp(folio,
false), which skips the folio_test_hugetlb_vmemmap_optimized(folio) check
used when move_flag is true and frees the struct raw_hwp_page entries from
old_head. Once CPU0 installs new_head and flushes the TLB, the folio still
has PG_hwpoison set and folio->_hugetlb_hwpoison pointing to freed memory,
leading to a use-after-free or double free when the list is later walked or
freed.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261111093747.50048-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-11 9:37 [PATCH v2 0/3] mm/hugetlb_vmemmap: Fix HVO races and deadlock Muchun Song
2026-11-11 9:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm/hugetlb_vmemmap: fix lost HWPoison state during optimization Muchun Song
2026-11-11 14:53 ` Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga
2026-11-11 17:46 ` Jiaqi Yan
2026-11-11 22:38 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-12 2:59 ` Muchun Song
2026-11-12 5:35 ` Muchun Song
2026-11-11 9:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mm/hugetlb_vmemmap: fix PMD split TLB flush race Muchun Song
2026-11-11 14:55 ` Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga
2026-11-11 9:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mm/hugetlb_vmemmap: fix deadlock during PMD split Muchun Song
2026-11-11 14:56 ` Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-209812@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox