From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "David Matlack" <dmatlack@google.com>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: "Alexander Graf" <graf@amazon.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Baolin Wang" <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
"Hugh Dickins" <hughd@google.com>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
"Lorenzo Stoakes" <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
"Pasha Tatashin" <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
"Pratyush Yadav" <pratyush@kernel.org>,
"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
"Samiullah Khawaja" <skhawaja@google.com>,
"Shuah Khan" <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/19] mm/shmem_luo: Leave freeing the preserved state to finish()
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 00:31:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-209941@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261111002358.1842967-10-dmatlack@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Medium] mm/shmem_luo: preserved folios freed before finish() if
retrieve_folios() fails
--
commit 07031901f696f6bb10658c21e386ae0237da0633
Author: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
mm/shmem_luo: Leave freeing the preserved state to finish()
This commit defers freeing the serialized shmem state from
shmem_luo_retrieve() to shmem_luo_finish() so that preserved folios are not
leaked or freed prematurely when retrieve fails.
> diff --git a/mm/shmem_luo.c b/mm/shmem_luo.c
> index e747a04422954..b48d7f460493d 100644
> --- a/mm/shmem_luo.c
> +++ b/mm/shmem_luo.c
> @@ -390,13 +390,10 @@ static void shmem_luo_finish(struct liveupdate_file_op_args *args)
> struct shmem_luo_ser *ser;
>
> /*
> - * If retrieve was successful, nothing to do. If it failed, retrieve()
> - * already cleaned up everything it could. So nothing to do there
> - * either. Only need to clean up when retrieve was not called.
> + * Preserved folios may be in use until the session is finished, so
> + * retrieve() leaves freeing the preserved state to finish(), whether it
> + * succeeds or not.
> */
> - if (args->retrieve_status)
> - return;
> -
> ser = phys_to_virt(args->serialized_data);
> if (!ser)
> return;
> @@ -515,9 +512,34 @@ static int shmem_luo_retrieve_folios(struct file *file,
> return err;
> }
>
> -static int shmem_luo_retrieve(struct liveupdate_file_op_args *args)
> +/*
> + * Restore the preserved folios into @file. This consumes them even if it fails,
> + * since they are then either in @file or freed, so make sure finish() doesn't
> + * free them again.
> + */
> +static int shmem_luo_restore_folios(struct file *file,
> + struct shmem_luo_ser *ser)
> {
> struct shmem_luo_folio_ser *folios_ser;
> + u64 nr_folios = ser->nr_folios;
> + int err;
> +
> + if (!nr_folios)
> + return 0;
> +
> + ser->nr_folios = 0;
> +
> + folios_ser = kho_restore_vmalloc(&ser->folios);
> + if (!folios_ser)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + err = shmem_luo_retrieve_folios(file, folios_ser, nr_folios);
> + vfree(folios_ser);
> + return err;
> +}
[ ... ]
> @@ -552,28 +571,15 @@ static int shmem_luo_retrieve(struct liveupdate_file_op_args *args)
> vfs_setpos(file, ser->pos, MAX_LFS_FILESIZE);
> i_size_write(file_inode(file), ser->size);
>
> - if (ser->nr_folios) {
> - folios_ser = kho_restore_vmalloc(&ser->folios);
> - if (!folios_ser) {
> - err = -EINVAL;
> - goto put_file;
> - }
> -
> - err = shmem_luo_retrieve_folios(file, folios_ser, ser->nr_folios);
> - vfree(folios_ser);
> - if (err)
> - goto put_file;
> - }
> + err = shmem_luo_restore_folios(file, ser);
> + if (err)
> + goto put_file;
>
> args->file = file;
> - kho_restore_free(ser);
> -
> return 0;
>
> put_file:
> fput(file);
> -free_ser:
> - kho_restore_free(ser);
> return err;
> }
[Severity: Medium]
Does shmem_luo_retrieve() still free all preserved folios before
shmem_luo_finish() if shmem_luo_retrieve_folios() fails?
When shmem_luo_retrieve_folios() fails mid-loop (for example, if
mem_cgroup_charge() fails), its error path restores and puts the remaining
folios, and the jump to put_file in shmem_luo_retrieve() calls fput(file),
which evicts the inode and frees the folios already added to the page cache:
mm/shmem_luo.c:shmem_luo_retrieve_folios() {
...
unlock_folio:
folio_unlock(folio);
folio_put(folio);
put_folios:
...
for (long j = i + 1; j < nr_folios; j++) {
...
folio = kho_restore_folio(phys);
if (folio)
folio_put(folio);
}
}
If a preserved device still holds DMA mappings to those folios until the
session finishes, freeing them during retrieve() allows the pages to be
reallocated while still in use.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261111002358.1842967-1-dmatlack@google.com?part=9
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-12 0:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-11 0:23 [PATCH v4 00/19] liveupdate: Preserve tmpfs files across Live Update David Matlack
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 01/19] liveupdate: Remove the list of steps from luo_preserve_file()'s comment David Matlack
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 02/19] liveupdate: Pass user argument to file preserve and retrieve David Matlack
2026-11-12 0:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 03/19] selftests/liveupdate: Add tests for preserve and retrieve user argument David Matlack
2026-11-12 0:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 04/19] liveupdate: Allow file handlers to mark retrieve failures as retryable David Matlack
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 05/19] mm: Rename memfd_luo to shmem_luo David Matlack
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 06/19] liveupdate: Don't WARN if tracking a retrieved file fails David Matlack
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 07/19] liveupdate: Add helpers to track the files that LUO manages David Matlack
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 08/19] liveupdate: Let file handlers retrieve into an existing file David Matlack
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 09/19] mm/shmem_luo: Leave freeing the preserved state to finish() David Matlack
2026-11-12 0:31 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 10/19] mm/shmem_luo: Don't make early retrieve failures permanent David Matlack
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 11/19] mm/shmem_luo: Require permission to preserve a file David Matlack
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 12/19] mm/shmem_luo: Retrieve tmpfs files into a file created by userspace David Matlack
2026-11-12 0:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 13/19] mm/shmem_luo: Allow preserving tmpfs files David Matlack
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 14/19] selftests/liveupdate: Test which tmpfs files can be preserved David Matlack
2026-11-12 0:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 15/19] selftests/liveupdate: Add a test for retrieving tmpfs files David Matlack
2026-11-12 0:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 16/19] selftests/liveupdate: Test memfds and LUO interactions in luo_tmpfs David Matlack
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 17/19] selftests/liveupdate: Test the targets of retrieved tmpfs files David Matlack
2026-11-12 0:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 18/19] selftests/liveupdate: Test retrieving tmpfs files preserved read-only David Matlack
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 19/19] selftests/liveupdate: Test block accounting of retrieved tmpfs files David Matlack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-209941@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).