Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@kernel.org>,
	"Andrey Ryabinin" <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Marco Elver" <elver@google.com>,
	"Alexander Potapenko" <glider@google.com>
Cc: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Sven Schnelle" <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Andrey Konovalov" <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
	"Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>,
	"Vincenzo Frascino" <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	"Steffen Eiden" <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Aleksei Nikiforov" <aleksei.nikiforov@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Andreas Grapentin" <gra@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Finn Thain" <fthain@linux-m68k.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Anshuman Khandual" <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] instrumented.h: mark instrument_write non-const
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 09:23:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-210869@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261111092231.2027735-1-arnd@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
issues to consider:
- [Low] kasan: instrument_read_write() hides uninitialized variables
  under KASAN
- [Low] instrumented.h: inaccurate Fixes tag and RFC question in commit
  message
--

commit e49ee4fd80c81d953b77b9f3cd5a327db833a726
Author: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

> instrumented.h: mark instrument_write non-const
>
> I got another instance of a -Wmaybe-uninitialized in ntfs, as this is
> the only place that enables the warning:
>
> In file included from include/asm-generic/rwonce.h:26,
>                  from fs/ntfs3/file.c:10:
> In function 'instrument_copy_from_user_before',
>     inlined from '_inline_copy_from_user' at include/linux/uaccess.h:184:2,
>     inlined from 'copy_from_user' at include/linux/uaccess.h:222:9,
>     inlined from 'ntfs_ioctl_fitrim' at fs/ntfs3/file.c:78:6,
>     inlined from 'ntfs_ioctl' at fs/ntfs3/file.c:246:10:
> include/linux/kasan-checks.h:38:27: error: 'range' may be used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
>    38 | #define kasan_check_write __kasan_check_write
> include/linux/instrumented.h:146:9: note: in expansion of macro 'kasan_check_write'
>   146 |         kasan_check_write(to, n);
>       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/kasan-checks.h: In function 'ntfs_ioctl':
> include/linux/kasan-checks.h:20:6: note: by argument 1 of type 'const volatile void *' to '__kasan_check_write' declared here
>    20 | bool __kasan_check_write(const volatile void *p, unsigned int size);
>       |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> fs/ntfs3/file.c:66:29: note: 'range' declared here
>    66 |         struct fstrim_range range;
>       |                             ^~~~~
>
> The problem here is that copy_from_user() is called on an uninitialized
> object, but the instrumentation passes the pointer into a function that
> takes a const object. gcc deduces that any access to that object is
> undefined behavior and warns about it.
>
> The only workaround I could come up with is to remove the 'const' keyword
> from these annotations, which of course is not great either, as the
> functions do not actually access the data at all.
>
> This also found incorrect 'const' annotations in
> arch/s390/include/asm/fpu-insn.h, which writes to those pointers.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Fixes: 33b75c1d884e ("instrumented.h: allow instrumenting both sides of copy_from_user()")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

[Severity: Low]
33b75c1d884e ("instrumented.h: allow instrumenting both sides of
copy_from_user()") only renamed instrument_copy_from_user() to
instrument_copy_from_user_before().  The const void *to parameter calling
kasan_check_write(to, n) was introduced in 36e4d4dd4fc4 ("include/linux: Add
instrumented.h infrastructure"), and __kasan_check_write(const volatile void
*p, ...) was introduced in 7d8ad890dad0 ("mm/kasan: introduce
__kasan_check_{read,write}").  Also, the "Any ideas?" question from the RFC is
still in the commit message.

> diff --git a/include/linux/instrumented.h b/include/linux/instrumented.h
> index a1b4cf81adc2a..d28aa6b0aeb8c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/instrumented.h
> +++ b/include/linux/instrumented.h
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ static __always_inline void instrument_read(const volatile void *v, size_t size)
>   * Instrument a regular write access. The instrumentation should be inserted
>   * before the actual write happens.
>   */
> -static __always_inline void instrument_write(const volatile void *v, size_t size)
> +static __always_inline void instrument_write(volatile void *v, size_t size)
>  {
>  	kasan_check_write(v, size);
>  	kcsan_check_write(v, size);
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static __always_inline void instrument_write(const volatile void *v, size_t size
>   * Instrument a regular write access. The instrumentation should be inserted
>   * before the actual write happens.
>   */
> -static __always_inline void instrument_read_write(const volatile void *v, size_t size)
> +static __always_inline void instrument_read_write(volatile void *v, size_t size)
>  {
>  	kasan_check_write(v, size);
>  	kcsan_check_read_write(v, size);
> @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static __always_inline void instrument_atomic_read(const volatile void *v, size_
>   * Instrument an atomic write access. The instrumentation should be inserted
>   * before the actual write happens.
>   */
> -static __always_inline void instrument_atomic_write(const volatile void *v, size_t size)
> +static __always_inline void instrument_atomic_write(volatile void *v, size_t size)
>  {
>  	kasan_check_write(v, size);
>  	kcsan_check_atomic_write(v, size);
> @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static __always_inline void instrument_atomic_write(const volatile void *v, size
>   * Instrument an atomic read-write access. The instrumentation should be
>   * inserted before the actual write happens.
>   */
> -static __always_inline void instrument_atomic_read_write(const volatile void *v, size_t size)
> +static __always_inline void instrument_atomic_read_write(volatile void *v, size_t size)
>  {
>  	kasan_check_write(v, size);
>  	kcsan_check_atomic_read_write(v, size);

[ ... ]

> diff --git a/include/linux/kasan-checks.h b/include/linux/kasan-checks.h
> index 3d6d22a25bdc3..90b878b876f5c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kasan-checks.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kasan-checks.h
> @@ -17,13 +17,13 @@
>   */
>  #if defined(CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC) || defined(CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS)
>  bool __kasan_check_read(const volatile void *p, unsigned int size);
> -bool __kasan_check_write(const volatile void *p, unsigned int size);
> +bool __kasan_check_write(volatile void *p, unsigned int size);

[Severity: Low]
Does removing const from __kasan_check_write() suppress legitimate
-Wuninitialized and -Wmaybe-uninitialized warnings for callers of
instrument_read_write() and instrument_atomic_read_write() when KASAN is
enabled?

When a local variable's address is passed to an external function taking a
non-const pointer, GCC assumes the call may initialize the object.  Because
instrument_read_write() and instrument_atomic_read_write() call
kasan_check_write(v, size) before kcsan_check_read_write(v, size) and before
the caller's read-modify-write operation (such as oldp in try_cmpxchg()),
uninitialized read-modify-write operands will be treated as initialized by
__kasan_check_write().

07a1a6562ce2 ("kcsan: Silence -Wmaybe-uninitialized when calling
__kcsan_check_access()") avoided the same fs/ntfs3/file.c warning for KCSAN by
keeping const volatile void * on the external function and wrapping the
pointer in absolute_pointer() only in the write-only macros while leaving
read-write checks unwrapped.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261111092231.2027735-1-arnd@kernel.org?part=1


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-11-12  9:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-11  9:21 [PATCH] [RFC] instrumented.h: mark instrument_write non-const Arnd Bergmann
2026-11-11  9:59 ` Marco Elver
2026-11-11 10:23   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-11 12:43 ` Alexander Gordeev
2026-11-12  9:23 ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-210869@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aleksei.nikiforov@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=fthain@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gra@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox