Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga" <azpijr@gmail.com>,
	"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>, "Zi Yan" <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Lorenzo Stoakes" <ljs@kernel.org>
Cc: "Baolin Wang" <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
	"Nico Pache" <nico.pache@linux.dev>,
	"Ryan Roberts" <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
	"Dev Jain" <dev.jain@arm.com>, "Barry Song" <baohua@kernel.org>,
	"Lance Yang" <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
	"Usama Arif" <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
	"Kiryl Shutsemau" <kas@kernel.org>,
	"Rik van Riel" <riel@surriel.com>,
	"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	"Harry Yoo" <harry@kernel.org>, "Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, "Joanne Koong" <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] mm/huge_memory: detect partially mapped shared folios without per-page mapcounts
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 11:36:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-211031@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261111113535.330078-3-azpijr@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Medium] mm/huge_memory: deferred_split_scan() runs PMD
  thp_underused() on mTHPs
--

commit 2f9d38ddfb170d3656f9925bef1e82e9b94ecc37
Author: Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga <azpijr@gmail.com>

mm/huge_memory: detect partially mapped shared folios without per-page mapcounts

This commit queues shared anonymous folios onto the deferred split list
without setting PG_partially_mapped when CONFIG_NO_PAGE_MAPCOUNT cannot tell
at unmap time whether all subpages remain mapped, and walks the rmap in
deferred_split_scan() to check them.

> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index 8c4a69c797edd..f80fa028dd340 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -4744,6 +4811,15 @@ static unsigned long deferred_split_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
>  		list_lru_unlock_irq(lru);
>  		rcu_read_unlock();
>  
> +		if (!folio_test_partially_mapped(folio) &&
> +		    folio_needs_mapped_check(folio)) {
> +			if (!folio_trylock(folio))
> +				goto requeue;
> +			/* Sets PG_partially_mapped and puts it back on the queue. */
> +			if (folio_mapped_shared_partially(folio))
> +				deferred_split_folio(folio, true);
> +			folio_unlock(folio);
> +		}
>  		if (!folio_test_partially_mapped(folio)) {
>  			/*
>  			 * See try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(): we cannot
> @@ -4752,7 +4828,7 @@ static unsigned long deferred_split_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
>  			 */
>  			if (folio_test_mlocked(folio))
>  				goto next;
> -			underused = thp_underused(folio);
> +			underused = split_underused_thp && thp_underused(folio);
>  			if (!underused)
>  				goto next;
>  		}

[Severity: Medium]
Can deferred_split_scan() now call thp_underused() on a sub-PMD mTHP?

Previously, only map_anon_folio_pmd_nopf() queued folios with
partially_mapped == false, so any folio reaching the !folio_test_partially_mapped(folio)
branch was PMD-sized.  __folio_remove_rmap() now queues shared anonymous
folios of any order > 1 with partially_mapped == false when a partial unmap in
one process leaves the folio fully mapped in another.  When
folio_mapped_shared_partially() returns false for such a sub-PMD mTHP,
execution falls through to thp_underused(folio):

mm/huge_memory.c:thp_underused() {
    ...
	for (i = 0; i < folio_nr_pages(folio); i++) {
		if (pages_identical(folio_page(folio, i), ZERO_PAGE(0))) {
			if (++num_zero_pages > khugepaged_max_ptes_none)
				return true;
		} else {
			if (++num_filled_pages >= HPAGE_PMD_NR - khugepaged_max_ptes_none)
				return false;
		}
	}
    ...
}

Because thp_underused() compares against unscaled HPAGE_PMD_NR and
khugepaged_max_ptes_none thresholds, any khugepaged_max_ptes_none below
HPAGE_PMD_NR - 1 causes reclaim to scan subpages with pages_identical() even
when neither threshold can be reached, or to split fully mapped sub-PMD mTHPs
and increment THP_UNDERUSED_SPLIT_PAGE.  Checking folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio)
before calling thp_underused(folio) would avoid this.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261111113535.330078-1-azpijr@gmail.com?part=2


  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-12 11:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-11 11:31 [RFC PATCH 0/2] mm/huge_memory: find partially mapped shared folios with NO_PAGE_MAPCOUNT Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga
2026-11-11 11:31 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm/huge_memory: check split_underused_thp in the caller of deferred_split_folio() Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga
2026-11-11 11:31 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] mm/huge_memory: detect partially mapped shared folios without per-page mapcounts Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga
2026-11-12 11:36   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-12 12:43     ` Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga
2026-11-12 12:46 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] mm/huge_memory: find partially mapped shared folios with NO_PAGE_MAPCOUNT David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-12 13:03   ` Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-211031@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=azpijr@gmail.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=harry@kernel.org \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
    --cc=kas@kernel.org \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=nico.pache@linux.dev \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox