From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Tomás Senart" <ts@perfloop.ai>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, yosry@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
nphamcs@gmail.com
Cc: roman.gushchin@linux.dev, tj@kernel.org,
chengming.zhou@linux.dev, mkoutny@suse.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
mhocko@kernel.org, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, muchun.song@linux.dev,
cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com, shuah@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: zswap: honor zero cgroup limits after successful reclaim
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 23:23:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-211950@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261112-zswap-zero-limit-v1-1-19f33081b09e@perfloop.ai>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
issues to consider:
- [Low] selftests/cgroup: missing wait for populated 0 in
test_zswap_max_zero()
- [Low] selftests/cgroup: silent KSFT_SKIP returns in
test_zswap_max_zero()
--
commit cb5209a5f058b3ca9ae23b219994b4a826f192b3
Author: Tomás Senart <ts@perfloop.ai>
mm: zswap: honor zero cgroup limits after successful reclaim
This commit checks for a zero zswap limit across the cgroup hierarchy after
reclaiming entries in zswap_store() so that a cgroup with memory.zswap.max
set to zero does not store newly compressed pages, and adds a selftest.
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_zswap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_zswap.c
> index d50acc1b83ac8..7632aadd88662 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_zswap.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_zswap.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -244,6 +245,105 @@ static int test_swapin_nozswap(const char *root)
> +static int test_zswap_max_zero(const char *root)
> +{
> + char *group = NULL, *child = NULL;
> + int ret = KSFT_FAIL;
> +
> + if (access(PATH_ZSWAP_STORED_PAGES, R_OK) ||
> + access(PATH_ZSWAP_WRITTEN_BACK_PAGES, R_OK))
> + return KSFT_SKIP;
> + if (cg_read_strcmp(root, "memory.zswap.writeback", "1"))
> + return KSFT_SKIP;
[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but returning KSFT_SKIP here without calling
ksft_print_msg() leaves out why the test was skipped, since main() only
passes the test name to ksft_test_result_skip().
> +
> + group = cg_name(root, "zswap_max_zero_test");
> + if (!group || cg_create(group))
> + goto out;
> + if (cg_run(group, pageout_zero_limit, group))
> + goto out;
> +
> + if (cg_write(group, "memory.zswap.max", "max"))
> + goto out;
> + if (cg_write(group, "cgroup.subtree_control", "+memory"))
> + goto out;
[Severity: Low]
Can writing "+memory" to cgroup.subtree_control fail intermittently with
-EBUSY right after cg_run() returns?
In the exit path, exit_notify() wakes waitpid() in cg_run() before the
dying child completes its final context switch in finish_task_switch() ->
cgroup_task_dead(), which decrements nr_populated_csets. If the parent
writes "+memory" to group/cgroup.subtree_control before that happens (such
as on a single-CPU VM), cgroup_vet_subtree_control_enable() sees
cgroup_has_tasks(cgrp) and rejects the write with -EBUSY, causing a false
test failure.
Wait for the cgroup to become unpopulated with
cg_read_strcmp_wait(group, "cgroup.events", "populated 0\n") before
enabling "+memory", as done in test_zswap_writeback() since commit
5547ee3a76b2 ("selftests/cgroup: test_zswap: wait for cgroup to unpopulate
in test_zswap_writeback").
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261112-zswap-zero-limit-v1-1-19f33081b09e@perfloop.ai?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-12 23:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-11 23:23 [PATCH] mm: zswap: honor zero cgroup limits after successful reclaim Tomás Senart via B4 Relay
2026-11-11 23:28 ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-11-12 0:55 ` Tomás Senart
2026-11-12 15:45 ` Nhat Pham
2026-11-12 16:37 ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-11-12 23:23 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-211950@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=ts@perfloop.ai \
--cc=yosry@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox