From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Xionggui Chen" <evers_chen@163.com>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: "Lorenzo Stoakes" <ljs@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, chenxionggui@lanxincomputing.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/mm: Handle implicit read permissions in madv_populate
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 03:19:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-212131@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261112031811.56500-1-evers_chen@163.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
issues to consider:
- [Low] selftests/mm: custom /proc/self/maps parser in
mapping_is_readable()
- [Low] selftests/mm: missing Fixes trailer for test_prot_write()
failure
--
commit 3592bfa7e9663819c643afaf7d6c337f6b102d15
Author: Xionggui Chen <chenxionggui@lanxincomputing.com>
> selftests/mm: Handle implicit read permissions in madv_populate
>
> The madv_populate selftest assumes that a mapping created with
> PROT_WRITE cannot be read, and expects MADV_POPULATE_READ to fail
> with EINVAL.
>
> However, some architectures, including RISC-V, may implicitly grant
> read permission to PROT_WRITE mappings. On such architectures,
> MADV_POPULATE_READ succeeds, causing the test to fail incorrectly.
>
> Check the actual VMA permissions through /proc/self/maps and adjust
> the expected result accordingly.
>
> Add a PROT_NONE test to verify that MADV_POPULATE_READ still fails
> with EINVAL for mappings without read permission.
>
> On RISC-V with Linux 7.2.0, the original test fails 1 out of 16
> tests, while the updated test passes all 17 tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xionggui Chen <chenxionggui@lanxincomputing.com>
[Severity: Low]
Should this commit include a Fixes: tag for the test it fixes?
Fixes: e5bfac53e310 ("selftests/vm: add test for MADV_POPULATE_(READ|WRITE)")
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/madv_populate.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/madv_populate.c
> index 7fce5d0b622be..818f99ee20041 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/madv_populate.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/madv_populate.c
> @@ -69,10 +69,38 @@ static void test_prot_read(void)
> munmap(addr, SIZE);
> }
>
> +static int mapping_is_readable(void *addr)
> +{
> + FILE *maps;
> + char line[256];
> + unsigned long start, end;
> + char perms[5];
> + int readable = -1;
> +
> + maps = fopen("/proc/self/maps", "r");
> + if (!maps)
> + return -1;
> +
> + while (fgets(line, sizeof(line), maps)) {
> + if (sscanf(line, "%lx-%lx %4s",
> + &start, &end, perms) != 3)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (start <= (unsigned long)addr &&
> + (unsigned long)addr < end) {
> + readable = perms[0] == 'r';
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + fclose(maps);
> + return readable;
> +}
[Severity: Low]
Could mapping_is_readable() reuse the shared VMA helpers in vm_util.h
instead of open-coding a /proc/self/maps parser?
madv_populate.c already includes vm_util.h and links against vm_util.c,
which provide open_self_procmap(), find_vma_procmap(), and close_procmap()
(exposing PROCMAP_QUERY_VMA_READABLE in procmap.query.vma_flags) as well as
check_vmflag(addr, "rd"). Reusing those avoids duplicating VMA lookup logic
and avoids line truncation on mappings with paths longer than 256 bytes.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261112031811.56500-1-evers_chen@163.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-13 3:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-12 3:18 [PATCH] selftests/mm: Handle implicit read permissions in madv_populate Xionggui Chen
2026-11-12 19:32 ` Andrew Morton
2026-11-13 2:12 ` 陈熊贵
2026-11-13 3:15 ` cxg
2026-11-13 3:19 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-13 3:58 ` cxg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-212131@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chenxionggui@lanxincomputing.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=evers_chen@163.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox