From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Breno Leitao" <leitao@debian.org>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@kernel.org>,
"Harry Yoo" <harry@kernel.org>, "Hao Li" <hao.li@linux.dev>,
"Christoph Lameter" <cl@gentwo.org>,
"David Rientjes" <rientjes@google.com>,
"Roman Gushchin" <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab: allow sheaves for SLAB_NOLEAKTRACE caches
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 10:05:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-212599@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261112-kmemleak_sheaves-v1-1-e40e3d73b253@debian.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Medium] mm/slub: SLAB_ALLOC_NO_LEAKTRACE leaks into nested sheaf
allocations
--
commit 7da9d1d54f05d33de4e779dda137bfa95c2a403c
Author: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
slab: allow sheaves for SLAB_NOLEAKTRACE caches
This commit introduces SLAB_ALLOC_NO_LEAKTRACE so sheaves allocated for
SLAB_NOLEAKTRACE caches skip kmemleak tracking, allowing those caches to
use per-CPU sheaves without recursing into kmemleak.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aW_NK2NXVgtuzCVH@gmail.com/ [1]
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 8369853ddca72..f19e20b6f9a4f 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -2850,6 +2850,13 @@ static struct slab_sheaf *__alloc_empty_sheaf(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfp,
> if (s->flags & SLAB_KMALLOC)
> alloc_flags |= SLAB_ALLOC_NO_RECURSE;
>
> + /*
> + * kmemleak allocates its metadata from SLAB_NOLEAKTRACE caches, so
> + * tracking their sheaves would recurse into kmemleak.
> + */
> + if (s->flags & SLAB_NOLEAKTRACE)
> + alloc_flags |= SLAB_ALLOC_NO_LEAKTRACE;
> +
> sheaf_size = struct_size(sheaf, objects, capacity);
> sheaf = kmalloc_flags(sheaf_size, gfp | __GFP_ZERO, alloc_flags, NUMA_NO_NODE);
[Severity: Medium]
Does SLAB_ALLOC_NO_LEAKTRACE leak into nested sheaf and slabobj_ext
allocations for the backing normal kmalloc cache?
When s is a SLAB_NOLEAKTRACE cache (such as kmemleak's object_cache),
s->flags & SLAB_KMALLOC is false, so __alloc_empty_sheaf() passes
SLAB_ALLOC_NO_LEAKTRACE to kmalloc_flags() without SLAB_ALLOC_NO_RECURSE.
If the backing normal kmalloc bucket needs a new empty sheaf in
alloc_from_pcs() -> __pcs_replace_empty_main() -> alloc_empty_sheaf(),
that nested sheaf allocation inherits SLAB_ALLOC_NO_LEAKTRACE and is not
registered with kmemleak.
Because kmemleak never scans that untracked normal kmalloc sheaf:
- If the sheaf is later used as pcs->rcu_free in __kfree_rcu_sheaf(),
kvfree_call_rcu() returns before kmemleak_ignore(ptr) while freeing is
deferred, so kmemleak_scan() misses pcs->rcu_free->objects[] and reports
queued objects as false-positive leaks.
- Any tracked kmalloc sheaf linked between two untracked sheaves on
barn->sheaves_full or barn->sheaves_empty is unreachable during
kmemleak_scan() and is also reported as a false-positive leak.
- In slab_post_alloc_hook() -> alloc_tagging_slab_alloc_hook() ->
prepare_slab_obj_exts_hook() -> alloc_slab_obj_exts(), the slabobj_ext
vector is likewise allocated with SLAB_ALLOC_NO_LEAKTRACE still set,
skipping kmemleak registration before calling kmemleak_not_leak(vec).
Setting SLAB_ALLOC_NO_RECURSE along with SLAB_ALLOC_NO_LEAKTRACE (or
clearing SLAB_ALLOC_NO_LEAKTRACE before nested allocations) would prevent
the flag from propagating into the normal kmalloc cache's own metadata.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261112-kmemleak_sheaves-v1-1-e40e3d73b253@debian.org?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-13 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-12 10:04 [PATCH] slab: allow sheaves for SLAB_NOLEAKTRACE caches Breno Leitao
2026-11-12 16:40 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-11-13 10:05 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-212599@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox