Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Barry Song (Xiaomi)" <baohua@kernel.org>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: axelrasmussen@google.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
	baoquan.he@linux.dev, hannes@cmpxchg.org, hui.zhu@linux.dev,
	kasong@tencent.com, kunwu.chan@gmail.com, liam@infradead.org,
	lianux.mm@gmail.com, liuxiang.277@bytedance.com,
	lyugaofei@xiaomi.com, mhocko@kernel.org, mhocko@suse.com,
	qi.zheng@linux.dev, ridong.chen@linux.dev, rppt@kernel.org,
	ryncsn@gmail.com, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, surenb@google.com,
	wangzicheng@honor.com, weixugc@google.com, yuanchu@google.com,
	zhangbo56@xiaomi.com, zhuhui@kylinos.cn,
	sidchintamaneni@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 12/16] mm/mglru: Restrict eviction accounting to eligible zones
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2026 02:02:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-214031@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261113185541.70203-13-baohua@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [High] mm/mglru: broken min_ttl and low-zone OOM checks in
  lruvec_is_reclaimable()
--

commit 4a520d7db30ed5c782371c3ef4bdf4fd79c1de3e
Author: Barry Song (Xiaomi) <baohua@kernel.org>

mm/mglru: Restrict eviction accounting to eligible zones

This commit restricts lruvec_evictable_size() and lru_gen_imbalanced() to
count only zones up to sc->reclaim_idx, and defers the lruvec_is_sizable()
check in lruvec_is_reclaimable() to low priorities when sc->reclaim_idx is
at least ZONE_NORMAL.

> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 9071f8889b5c4..6ed47089a3305 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -4205,8 +4205,8 @@ static void set_initial_priority(struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct scan_control
>  	sc->priority = clamp(priority, DEF_PRIORITY / 2, DEF_PRIORITY);
>  }
>  
> -static void lruvec_evictable_size(struct lruvec *lruvec, int swappiness,
> -				  unsigned long nr[])
> +static void lruvec_evictable_size(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc,
> +				  int swappiness, unsigned long nr[])
>  {
>  	int type;
>  	unsigned long seq;
> @@ -4219,7 +4219,7 @@ static void lruvec_evictable_size(struct lruvec *lruvec, int swappiness,
>  
>  	for_each_evictable_type(type, swappiness) {
>  		for (seq = min_seq[type]; seq <= max_seq; seq++)
> -			nr[type] += lruvec_gen_size(lrugen, type, seq);
> +			nr[type] += lruvec_gen_size(lrugen, type, seq, sc->reclaim_idx + 1);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -4228,7 +4228,7 @@ static bool lruvec_is_sizable(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
>  	unsigned long total, sizes[ANON_AND_FILE];
>  	int swappiness = get_swappiness(lruvec, sc);
>  
> -	lruvec_evictable_size(lruvec, swappiness, sizes);
> +	lruvec_evictable_size(lruvec, sc, swappiness, sizes);
>  	total = sizes[LRU_GEN_ANON] + sizes[LRU_GEN_FILE];
>  
>  	/* whether the size is big enough to be helpful */
> @@ -4247,7 +4247,13 @@ static bool lruvec_is_reclaimable(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc
>  	if (mem_cgroup_below_min(NULL, memcg))
>  		return false;
>  
> -	if (!lruvec_is_sizable(lruvec, sc))
> +	/*
> +	 * As in __alloc_pages_may_oom(), avoid triggering OOM for low-zone
> +	 * allocations. Also, defer the LRU size check until reclaim reaches
> +	 * a very low priority to avoid premature OOM.
> +	 */
> +	if (sc->priority <= 1 && sc->reclaim_idx >= ZONE_NORMAL &&
> +	    !lruvec_is_sizable(lruvec, sc))
>  		return false;
>  
>  	gen = lru_gen_from_seq(evictable_min_seq(min_seq, swappiness));

[Severity: High]
Does skipping lruvec_is_sizable() at sc->priority > 1 bypass min_ttl_ms
working-set protection whenever any empty memcg exists?

For a memcg with no evictable pages (such as root_mem_cgroup or non-leaf
slice cgroups like system.slice under cgroup v2), lru_gen_prepare_scan()
computes a zero scan budget, so try_to_shrink_lruvec() never ages it and
lrugen.timestamps[0] remains at its creation time.  At priorities
DEF_PRIORITY down to 2, lruvec_is_sizable() is no longer called to filter
out empty memcgs, so any empty memcg older than min_ttl returns true from
time_is_before_jiffies(birth + min_ttl) and sets reclaimable = true in
lru_gen_age_node():

mm/vmscan.c:lru_gen_age_node() {
	...
		if (!reclaimable)
			reclaimable = lruvec_is_reclaimable(lruvec, sc, min_ttl);
	} while ((memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, memcg, NULL)));

	if (!reclaimable && mutex_trylock(&oom_lock)) {
		struct oom_control oc = {
			.gfp_mask = sc->gfp_mask,
		};

		out_of_memory(&oc);
}

kswapd_shrink_node() then runs and evicts folios from active memcgs even
when all of their generations are younger than min_ttl, satisfying reclaim
before sc.priority reaches 1.

In addition, checking sc->reclaim_idx >= ZONE_NORMAL only around
!lruvec_is_sizable() does not prevent low-zone OOM kills: when
sc->reclaim_idx < ZONE_NORMAL and all memcgs have timestamps younger than
min_ttl, lruvec_is_reclaimable() still returns false and lru_gen_age_node()
still calls out_of_memory().

Finally, because lruvec_evictable_size() now sums only zones up to
sc->reclaim_idx, if kswapd reclaims with sc.reclaim_idx == ZONE_NORMAL when
user LRU folios sit in ZONE_MOVABLE or ZONE_HIGHMEM and ZONE_NORMAL has
fewer than 2 evictable pages per memcg, sc.priority drops to 1 and
lruvec_is_sizable() returns false for all memcgs, triggering a global OOM
kill while higher zones have reclaimable memory older than min_ttl.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261113185541.70203-1-baohua@kernel.org?part=12


  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-14  2:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-13 18:55 [PATCH v8 00/16] mm: mglru: fix swappiness behavior Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-13 18:55 ` [PATCH v8 01/16] mm/mglru: report evictable sizes per type Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-13 18:55 ` [PATCH v8 02/16] mm/mglru: extract lruvec_populated_min_seq() helper Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-14  2:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 18:55 ` [PATCH v8 03/16] mm/mglru: reclaim from the oldest populated gen Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-13 18:55 ` [PATCH v8 04/16] mm/mglru: lift the forced protection of reclaimer Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-13 18:55 ` [PATCH v8 05/16] mm/mglru: skip zones above reclaim_idx instead of rotating them Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-13 18:55 ` [PATCH v8 06/16] mm/mglru: return for unavailable anon reclaim earlier Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-13 18:55 ` [PATCH v8 07/16] mm/mglru: balance anon and file scan budget by refault rate Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-13 18:55 ` [PATCH v8 08/16] mm/mglru: lift youngest gen protection for higher priority Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-13 18:55 ` [PATCH v8 09/16] mm/mglru: Avoid placing rejected folios below populated gen Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-13 18:55 ` [PATCH v8 10/16] mm/mglru: Run aging when pages are rare outside the youngest gen Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-13 18:55 ` [PATCH v8 11/16] mm/mglru: Run aging when one type has no populatable folios Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-14  2:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 18:55 ` [PATCH v8 12/16] mm/mglru: Restrict eviction accounting to eligible zones Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-14  2:02   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-13 18:55 ` [PATCH v8 13/16] mm/mglru: Reduce LRU lock contention by shrinking folio batches in inc_min_seq Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-13 18:55 ` [PATCH v8 14/16] mm/mglru: Avoid prolonged anon reclaim with swappiness=200 Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-13 18:55 ` [PATCH v8 15/16] mm/mglru: Make swappiness=1 file reclaim more aggressive Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-13 18:55 ` [PATCH v8 16/16] mm/mglru: Avoid scan anon while swapcache is low for GFP_NOIO allocation Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-13 19:50 ` [PATCH v8 00/16] mm: mglru: fix swappiness behavior Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-214031@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hui.zhu@linux.dev \
    --cc=kasong@tencent.com \
    --cc=kunwu.chan@gmail.com \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=lianux.mm@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=liuxiang.277@bytedance.com \
    --cc=lyugaofei@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
    --cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryncsn@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=sidchintamaneni@gmail.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=wangzicheng@honor.com \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=yuanchu@google.com \
    --cc=zhangbo56@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=zhuhui@kylinos.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox