From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C01C4338F for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 15:56:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C55861052 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 15:56:49 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 8C55861052 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id E97908D0002; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 11:56:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id E47E86B0074; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 11:56:48 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id D8F696B006C; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 11:56:48 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0039.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.39]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C266F6B006C for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 11:56:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin04.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58BA918186D54 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 15:56:48 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78455995296.04.8DE75BE Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by imf24.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56FCB000824 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 15:56:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1628524607; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ksirypdUbDyon7gnRT9jI8jlCatrBjNvokJRvHrhIUA=; b=SSQYXfRa93nfgemSBnnXjcEcXpneUHAkbw7EdtPlmB17l8FBQIAXqaz4D4msGV7BvG39AW nwsHIFztNpuFH0wPl9gBbpsrxbXlbQljq/Kop/79eEFAUJNLinTy1EBz8v4hagcSjTbRdX yGC2+HdNzK2YmyeckI4qv9TT+fYjkqM= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-387-LyXmDG6AO1aeto5S1r0Jzg-1; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 11:56:43 -0400 X-MC-Unique: LyXmDG6AO1aeto5S1r0Jzg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE4108799EC; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 15:56:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com (segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com [10.19.60.26]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AB5A5DA60; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 15:56:41 +0000 (UTC) From: Jeff Moyer To: dan.j.williams@intel.com Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Tony Luck , Borislav Petkov , , , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [patch] x86/pat: pass correct address to sanitize_phys References: X-PGP-KeyID: 1F78E1B4 X-PGP-CertKey: F6FE 280D 8293 F72C 65FD 5A58 1FF8 A7CA 1F78 E1B4 Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2021 11:58:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Jeff Moyer's message of "Wed, 21 Jul 2021 15:48:10 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam06 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B56FCB000824 Authentication-Results: imf24.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=SSQYXfRa; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=none (imf24.hostedemail.com: domain of jmoyer@redhat.com has no SPF policy when checking 216.205.24.124) smtp.mailfrom=jmoyer@redhat.com X-Stat-Signature: 431bm5nscmwrp1k766phfjk4hx85dfad X-HE-Tag: 1628524607-959699 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Ping? This patch fixes a real problem seen in the field. Can I get some review? Thanks! Jeff Jeff Moyer writes: > memtype_reserve takes an address range of the form [start, end). It > then passes the start and end addresses to sanitize_phys, which is meant > to operate on the inclusive addresses. If end falls at the end of the > physical address space, sanitize_phys will return 0. This can result in > drivers failing to load: > > [ 10.000087] mpt3sas_cm0: unable to map adapter memory! or resource not found > [ 10.000334] mpt3sas_cm0: failure at drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c:10597/_scsih_probe()! > > Fix this by passing the inclusive end address to sanitize_phys. > > Fixes: 510ee090abc3 ("x86/mm/pat: Prepare {reserve, free}_memtype() for "decoy" addresses") > Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer > -- > It might be worth adding a comment, here. If there are any suggestions > on what a sane wording would be, I'm all ears. > > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c > index 3112ca7786ed..482557905294 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c > @@ -583,7 +583,7 @@ int memtype_reserve(u64 start, u64 end, enum page_cache_mode req_type, > int err = 0; > > start = sanitize_phys(start); > - end = sanitize_phys(end); > + end = sanitize_phys(end - 1) + 1; > if (start >= end) { > WARN(1, "%s failed: [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx], req %s\n", __func__, > start, end - 1, cattr_name(req_type));