From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail138.messagelabs.com (mail138.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 076B15F0001 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:47:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Jeff Moyer Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 3/6] nfs, direct-io: fix fork vs direct-io race on nfs References: <20090414151204.C647.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090414151806.C650.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:48:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090414151806.C650.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (KOSAKI Motohiro's message of "Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:19:24 +0900 (JST)") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: LKML , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Nick Piggin , Andrea Arcangeli , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: KOSAKI Motohiro writes: > Subject: [PATCH] nfs, direct-io: fix fork vs direct-io race on nfs > > After fs/diorect-io.c fix, following testcase still fail on nfs running. > it's because nfs has own specific diorct-io implementation. Same issue as 2/6. Cheers, Jeff -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org