public inbox for linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Subhash Jadavani" <subhashj@codeaurora.org>
To: "'Nath, Arindam'" <Arindam.Nath@amd.com>, 'Chris Ball' <cjb@laptop.org>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	'Philip Rakity' <prakity@marvell.com>,
	'zhangfei gao' <zhangfei.gao@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] mmc: sd: UHS-I bus speed should be set last in UHS initialization
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 14:42:47 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000001cc50f4$5a9e5530$0fdaff90$@org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6C03668EAF45B747AF947A1603D1B3000197C66B0B@SAUSEXMBP01.amd.com>

Hi Arindam,

Thank you for the review. Please find few comments inline.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nath, Arindam [mailto:Arindam.Nath@amd.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 12:38 PM
> To: Chris Ball; Subhash Jadavani
> Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org; Philip
> Rakity; zhangfei gao
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] mmc: sd: UHS-I bus speed should be set last in UHS
> initialization
> 
> Hi Subhash,
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chris Ball [mailto:cjb@laptop.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 1:40 AM
> > To: Subhash Jadavani
> > Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org; Nath,
> > Arindam
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: sd: UHS-I bus speed should be set last in
> UHS
> > initialization
> >
> > Hi Subhash, adding Arindam for review,
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 01 2011, Subhash Jadavani wrote:
> > > mmc_sd_init_uhs_card function sets the driver type, current limit
> > > and bus speed mode on card as well as on host controller side.
> > >
> > > Currently bus speed mode is set by sending CMD6 to card and
> > > immediately setting the timing mode in host controller. But
> > > then before initiating tuning sequence, it also tries to set
> > > current limit by sending CMD6 to card which results in data
> > > timeout errors in controller if bus speed mode is SDR50/SDR104
> mode.
> > >
> > > So basically bus speed mode should be set only after current limit
> > > is set in the card and immediately after setting the bus speed
> mode,
> > > tuning sequence should be initiated.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/mmc/core/sd.c |   57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> --
> > ---------
> > >  1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c
> > > index ff27741..d257496 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c
> > > @@ -459,10 +459,9 @@ static int sd_select_driver_type(struct
> mmc_card
> > *card, u8 *status)
> > >  	return 0;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > -static int sd_set_bus_speed_mode(struct mmc_card *card, u8
> *status)
> > > +static int sd_get_bus_speed_mode(struct mmc_card *card)
> > >  {
> > > -	unsigned int bus_speed = 0, timing = 0;
> > > -	int err;
> > > +	int bus_speed = 0;
> > >
> > >  	/*
> > >  	 * If the host doesn't support any of the UHS-I modes, fallback
> > on
> > > @@ -470,37 +469,56 @@ static int sd_set_bus_speed_mode(struct
> > mmc_card *card, u8 *status)
> > >  	 */
> > >  	if (!(card->host->caps & (MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR12 | MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR25 |
> > >  	    MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR50 | MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR104 | MMC_CAP_UHS_DDR50)))
> > > -		return 0;
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> 
> We should not return -EINVAL here, because this is not an error
> condition. This would simply mean that the card and host controller
> will fall back to using the default bus speed, and should still be
> operable. Check the comment below too.

Return value of this function gets used in sd_set_bus_speed_mode() function
and compared against all the valid bus speed modes. If we choose to return 0
from here then '0' corresponds to valid bus speed mode
'UHS_SDR12_BUS_SPEED'.

#define UHS_SDR12_BUS_SPEED     0
#define UHS_SDR25_BUS_SPEED     1
#define UHS_SDR50_BUS_SPEED     2
#define UHS_SDR104_BUS_SPEED    3
#define UHS_DDR50_BUS_SPEED     4

If we don't want to return the error value from this function then we can
basically remove following check from this *get* function and move it to
each *set* function before calling *get*. Please see more comments inline in
*set* functions below.

if (!(card->host->caps & (MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR12 | MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR25 |
	    MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR50 | MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR104 | MMC_CAP_UHS_DDR50)))
		return -EINVAL;

> 
> > >
> > >  	if ((card->host->caps & MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR104) &&
> > >  	    (card->sw_caps.sd3_bus_mode & SD_MODE_UHS_SDR104)) {
> > >  			bus_speed = UHS_SDR104_BUS_SPEED;
> > > -			timing = MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104;
> > > -			card->sw_caps.uhs_max_dtr = UHS_SDR104_MAX_DTR;
> > >  	} else if ((card->host->caps & MMC_CAP_UHS_DDR50) &&
> > >  		   (card->sw_caps.sd3_bus_mode & SD_MODE_UHS_DDR50)) {
> > >  			bus_speed = UHS_DDR50_BUS_SPEED;
> > > -			timing = MMC_TIMING_UHS_DDR50;
> > > -			card->sw_caps.uhs_max_dtr = UHS_DDR50_MAX_DTR;
> > >  	} else if ((card->host->caps & (MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR104 |
> > >  		    MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR50)) && (card->sw_caps.sd3_bus_mode &
> > >  		    SD_MODE_UHS_SDR50)) {
> > >  			bus_speed = UHS_SDR50_BUS_SPEED;
> > > -			timing = MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR50;
> > > -			card->sw_caps.uhs_max_dtr = UHS_SDR50_MAX_DTR;
> > >  	} else if ((card->host->caps & (MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR104 |
> > >  		    MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR50 | MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR25)) &&
> > >  		   (card->sw_caps.sd3_bus_mode & SD_MODE_UHS_SDR25)) {
> > >  			bus_speed = UHS_SDR25_BUS_SPEED;
> > > -			timing = MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR25;
> > > -			card->sw_caps.uhs_max_dtr = UHS_SDR25_MAX_DTR;
> > >  	} else if ((card->host->caps & (MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR104 |
> > >  		    MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR50 | MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR25 |
> > >  		    MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR12)) && (card->sw_caps.sd3_bus_mode &
> > >  		    SD_MODE_UHS_SDR12)) {
> > >  			bus_speed = UHS_SDR12_BUS_SPEED;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	return bus_speed;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int sd_set_bus_speed_mode(struct mmc_card *card, u8
> *status)
> > > +{
> > > +	int err, bus_speed;
> > > +	unsigned int timing = 0;
> > > +

We need add this check here.

	if (!(card->host->caps & (MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR12 | MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR25 |
  		    MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR50 | MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR104 |
MMC_CAP_UHS_DDR50)))
			return 0;


> > > +	bus_speed = sd_get_bus_speed_mode(card);
> > > +
> > > +	if (bus_speed == UHS_SDR104_BUS_SPEED) {
> > > +			timing = MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104;
> > > +			card->sw_caps.uhs_max_dtr = UHS_SDR104_MAX_DTR;
> > > +	} else if (bus_speed == UHS_DDR50_BUS_SPEED) {
> > > +			timing = MMC_TIMING_UHS_DDR50;
> > > +			card->sw_caps.uhs_max_dtr = UHS_DDR50_MAX_DTR;
> > > +	} else if (bus_speed == UHS_SDR50_BUS_SPEED) {
> > > +			timing = MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR50;
> > > +			card->sw_caps.uhs_max_dtr = UHS_SDR50_MAX_DTR;
> > > +	} else if (bus_speed == UHS_SDR25_BUS_SPEED) {
> > > +			timing = MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR25;
> > > +			card->sw_caps.uhs_max_dtr = UHS_SDR25_MAX_DTR;
> > > +	} else if (bus_speed == UHS_SDR12_BUS_SPEED) {
> > >  			timing = MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR12;
> > >  			card->sw_caps.uhs_max_dtr = UHS_SDR12_MAX_DTR;
> > > +	} else {
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > >  	}
> >
> > Minor change: I think "switch (sd_get_bus_speed_mode(card))" would be
> > cleaner.

Yes, we can replace it with switch. I will do it next patch rev.

> >
> > >
> > >  	card->sd_bus_speed = bus_speed;
> > > @@ -522,6 +540,7 @@ static int sd_set_bus_speed_mode(struct
> mmc_card
> > *card, u8 *status)
> > >  static int sd_set_current_limit(struct mmc_card *card, u8 *status)
> > >  {
> > >  	int current_limit = 0;
> > > +	unsigned int bus_speed = sd_get_bus_speed_mode(card);
> > >  	int err;

We need add this check here.

	if (!(card->host->caps & (MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR12 | MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR25 |
  		    MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR50 | MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR104 |
MMC_CAP_UHS_DDR50)))
			return 0;

> > >
> > >  	/*
> > > @@ -529,9 +548,9 @@ static int sd_set_current_limit(struct mmc_card
> > *card, u8 *status)
> > >  	 * bus speed modes. For other bus speed modes, we set the default
> > >  	 * current limit of 200mA.
> > >  	 */
> > > -	if ((card->sd_bus_speed == UHS_SDR50_BUS_SPEED) ||
> > > -	    (card->sd_bus_speed == UHS_SDR104_BUS_SPEED) ||
> > > -	    (card->sd_bus_speed == UHS_DDR50_BUS_SPEED)) {
> > > +	if ((bus_speed == UHS_SDR50_BUS_SPEED) ||
> > > +	    (bus_speed == UHS_SDR104_BUS_SPEED) ||
> > > +	    (bus_speed == UHS_DDR50_BUS_SPEED)) {
> > >  		if (card->host->caps & MMC_CAP_MAX_CURRENT_800) {
> > >  			if (card->sw_caps.sd3_curr_limit &
> > SD_MAX_CURRENT_800)
> > >  				current_limit = SD_SET_CURRENT_LIMIT_800;
> > > @@ -613,13 +632,13 @@ static int mmc_sd_init_uhs_card(struct
> mmc_card
> > *card)
> > >  	if (err)
> > >  		goto out;
> > >
> > > -	/* Set bus speed mode of the card */
> > > -	err = sd_set_bus_speed_mode(card, status);
> > > +	/* Set current limit for the card */
> > > +	err = sd_set_current_limit(card, status);
> > >  	if (err)
> > >  		goto out;
> > >
> > > -	/* Set current limit for the card */
> > > -	err = sd_set_current_limit(card, status);
> > > +	/* Set bus speed mode of the card */
> > > +	err = sd_set_bus_speed_mode(card, status);
> 
> Now supposing that we return -EINVAL here, then that would imply that
> mmc_sd_init_uhs_card() failed, but that should not be the case. Like I
> mentioned before, the card should still be operable using default speed
> mode.

When you say Default speed mode, does it mean SDR12 mode?

Thanks,
Subhash

> 
> Thanks,
> Arindam
> 
> > >  	if (err)
> > >  		goto out;
> > >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > - Chris.
> > --
> > Chris Ball   <cjb@laptop.org>   <http://printf.net/>
> > One Laptop Per Child
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-02  9:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-01 11:58 [PATCH] mmc: sd: UHS-I bus speed should be set last in UHS initialization Subhash Jadavani
2011-08-01 20:09 ` Chris Ball
2011-08-02  7:08   ` Nath, Arindam
2011-08-02  9:12     ` Subhash Jadavani [this message]
2011-08-02  9:51       ` Nath, Arindam
2011-08-02 12:40         ` Subhash Jadavani
2011-08-05 13:30           ` Issue with non-UHS-I SD3.0 cards Subhash Jadavani
2011-08-05 18:44             ` Nath, Arindam
2011-08-05 18:57             ` Nath, Arindam
2011-08-08  6:20               ` Subhash Jadavani
2011-08-08  6:42                 ` Nath, Arindam
2011-08-05 19:08             ` Nath, Arindam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='000001cc50f4$5a9e5530$0fdaff90$@org' \
    --to=subhashj@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=Arindam.Nath@amd.com \
    --cc=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=prakity@marvell.com \
    --cc=zhangfei.gao@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox