public inbox for linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Seunghwan Baek" <sh8267.baek@samsung.com>
To: "'Adrian Hunter'" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<ulf.hansson@linaro.org>, <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
	<quic_asutoshd@quicinc.com>
Cc: <grant.jung@samsung.com>, <jt77.jang@samsung.com>,
	<junwoo80.lee@samsung.com>, <dh0421.hwang@samsung.com>,
	<jangsub.yi@samsung.com>, <sh043.lee@samsung.com>,
	<cw9316.lee@samsung.com>, <wkon.kim@samsung.com>,
	<stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] mmc : fix for check cqe halt.
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 10:42:55 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000001daf822$70840e10$518c2a30$@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7164bfde-3c43-495f-8e1f-83b998ff17e2@intel.com>

> The subject starts with "[Patch 2/2]" but is there another patch?
> Did you mean "[Patch v2] ..."?
> 
> > To check if mmc cqe is in halt state, need to check set/clear of
> > CQHCI_HALT bit. At this time, we need to check with &, not &&.
> > Therefore, code to> check whether cqe is in halt state is modified to
> cqhci_halted, which has already been implemented.
> 
> Doesn't compile:
> 
> drivers/mmc/host/cqhci-core.c: In function ‘__cqhci_enable’:
> drivers/mmc/host/cqhci-core.c:285:13: error: implicit declaration of
> function ‘cqhci_halted’; did you mean ‘cqhci_writel’? [-Werror=implicit-
> function-declaration]
>   285 |         if (cqhci_halted(cq_host))
>       |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |             cqhci_writel
> drivers/mmc/host/cqhci-core.c: At top level:
> drivers/mmc/host/cqhci-core.c:956:13: error: conflicting types for
> ‘cqhci_halted’; have ‘bool(struct cqhci_host *)’ {aka ‘_Bool(struct
> cqhci_host *)’}
>   956 | static bool cqhci_halted(struct cqhci_host *cq_host)
>       |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/mmc/host/cqhci-core.c:285:13: note: previous implicit declaration
> of ‘cqhci_halted’ with type ‘int()’
>   285 |         if (cqhci_halted(cq_host))
>       |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> 
> Not only should it compile, but you must test it!
> 
> Probably better to make 2 patches:
> 1. Just the fix, cc stable i.e.
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/cqhci-core.c b/drivers/mmc/host/cqhci-core.c
> index c14d7251d0bb..a02da26a1efd 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/cqhci-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/cqhci-core.c
> @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static int cqhci_request(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct
> mmc_request *mrq)
>  		cqhci_writel(cq_host, 0, CQHCI_CTL);
>  		mmc->cqe_on = true;
>  		pr_debug("%s: cqhci: CQE on\n", mmc_hostname(mmc));
> -		if (cqhci_readl(cq_host, CQHCI_CTL) && CQHCI_HALT) {
> +		if (cqhci_readl(cq_host, CQHCI_CTL) & CQHCI_HALT) {
>  			pr_err("%s: cqhci: CQE failed to exit halt state\n",
>  			       mmc_hostname(mmc));
>  		}
> 
> 2. Tidy up, no cc stable
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/cqhci-core.c b/drivers/mmc/host/cqhci-core.c
> index a02da26a1efd..178277d90c31 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/cqhci-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/cqhci-core.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,11 @@ struct cqhci_slot {
>  #define CQHCI_HOST_OTHER	BIT(4)
>  };
> 
> +static bool cqhci_halted(struct cqhci_host *cq_host) {
> +	return cqhci_readl(cq_host, CQHCI_CTL) & CQHCI_HALT; }
> +
>  static inline u8 *get_desc(struct cqhci_host *cq_host, u8 tag)  {
>  	return cq_host->desc_base + (tag * cq_host->slot_sz); @@ -282,7
> +287,7 @@ static void __cqhci_enable(struct cqhci_host *cq_host)
> 
>  	cqhci_writel(cq_host, cqcfg, CQHCI_CFG);
> 
> -	if (cqhci_readl(cq_host, CQHCI_CTL) & CQHCI_HALT)
> +	if (cqhci_halted(cq_host))
>  		cqhci_writel(cq_host, 0, CQHCI_CTL);
> 
>  	mmc->cqe_on = true;
> @@ -617,7 +622,7 @@ static int cqhci_request(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct
> mmc_request *mrq)
>  		cqhci_writel(cq_host, 0, CQHCI_CTL);
>  		mmc->cqe_on = true;
>  		pr_debug("%s: cqhci: CQE on\n", mmc_hostname(mmc));
> -		if (cqhci_readl(cq_host, CQHCI_CTL) & CQHCI_HALT) {
> +		if (cqhci_halted(cq_host)) {
>  			pr_err("%s: cqhci: CQE failed to exit halt state\n",
>  			       mmc_hostname(mmc));
>  		}
> @@ -953,11 +958,6 @@ static bool cqhci_clear_all_tasks(struct mmc_host
> *mmc, unsigned int timeout)
>  	return ret;
>  }
> 
> -static bool cqhci_halted(struct cqhci_host *cq_host) -{
> -	return cqhci_readl(cq_host, CQHCI_CTL) & CQHCI_HALT;
> -}
> -
>  static bool cqhci_halt(struct mmc_host *mmc, unsigned int timeout)  {
>  	struct cqhci_host *cq_host = mmc->cqe_private;
> 
> 
> 
> >
> > Fixes: 0653300224a6 ("mmc: cqhci: rename cqhci.c to cqhci-core.c")
> 
> Fixes tag should be the commit that introduced the code, not one that
> moved it.  In this case, it has been there since the beginning:
> 
> Fixes: a4080225f51d ("mmc: cqhci: support for command queue enabled host")
> 
> Looks like the offending code kinda worked which explains why it wasn't
> noticed sooner.
> 
Sorry for my mistake.

I will make the patch again as you advised.

Thank you for your help.

> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Seunghwan Baek <sh8267.baek@samsung.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mmc/host/cqhci-core.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/cqhci-core.c
> > b/drivers/mmc/host/cqhci-core.c index c14d7251d0bb..3d5bcb92c78e
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/cqhci-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/cqhci-core.c
> > @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ static void __cqhci_enable(struct cqhci_host
> > *cq_host)
> >
> >  	cqhci_writel(cq_host, cqcfg, CQHCI_CFG);
> >
> > -	if (cqhci_readl(cq_host, CQHCI_CTL) & CQHCI_HALT)
> > +	if (cqhci_halted(cq_host))
> >  		cqhci_writel(cq_host, 0, CQHCI_CTL);
> >
> >  	mmc->cqe_on = true;
> > @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static int cqhci_request(struct mmc_host *mmc,
> struct mmc_request *mrq)
> >  		cqhci_writel(cq_host, 0, CQHCI_CTL);
> >  		mmc->cqe_on = true;
> >  		pr_debug("%s: cqhci: CQE on\n", mmc_hostname(mmc));
> > -		if (cqhci_readl(cq_host, CQHCI_CTL) && CQHCI_HALT) {
> > +		if (cqhci_halted(cq_host)) {
> >  			pr_err("%s: cqhci: CQE failed to exit halt state\n",
> >  			       mmc_hostname(mmc));
> >  		}




  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-27  1:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20240826091726epcas1p19797d2dd890feef6f9c4b83e9156341a@epcas1p1.samsung.com>
2024-08-26  9:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] mmc : fix for check cqe halt Seunghwan Baek
2024-08-26 10:16   ` Adrian Hunter
2024-08-27  1:42     ` Seunghwan Baek [this message]
     [not found] <CGME20240828060713epcas1p4ff8b4f345747eeb7e581385a62d07879@epcas1p4.samsung.com>
2024-08-28  6:07 ` Seunghwan Baek
2024-08-28  6:32   ` Ritesh Harjani

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='000001daf822$70840e10$518c2a30$@samsung.com' \
    --to=sh8267.baek@samsung.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=cw9316.lee@samsung.com \
    --cc=dh0421.hwang@samsung.com \
    --cc=grant.jung@samsung.com \
    --cc=jangsub.yi@samsung.com \
    --cc=jt77.jang@samsung.com \
    --cc=junwoo80.lee@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_asutoshd@quicinc.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=sh043.lee@samsung.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=wkon.kim@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox