linux-mmc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Subhash Jadavani" <subhashj@codeaurora.org>
To: "'Nath, Arindam'" <Arindam.Nath@amd.com>, cjb@laptop.org
Cc: zhangfei.gao@gmail.com, prakity@marvell.com,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, "'Su, Henry'" <Henry.Su@amd.com>,
	"'Lu, Aaron'" <Aaron.Lu@amd.com>,
	anath.amd@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 09/12] mmc: sd: add support for tuning during uhs initialization
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:49:49 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000f01cbe922$54219d00$fc64d700$@org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6C03668EAF45B747AF947A1603D1B300EA7E167B@SAUSEXMBP01.amd.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nath, Arindam [mailto:Arindam.Nath@amd.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 11:45 AM
> To: Subhash Jadavani; cjb@laptop.org
> Cc: zhangfei.gao@gmail.com; prakity@marvell.com; linux-
> mmc@vger.kernel.org; Su, Henry; Lu, Aaron; anath.amd@gmail.com
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 09/12] mmc: sd: add support for tuning during
> uhs initialization
> 
> Hi Subhash,
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Subhash Jadavani [mailto:subhashj@codeaurora.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 11:38 AM
> > To: Nath, Arindam; cjb@laptop.org
> > Cc: zhangfei.gao@gmail.com; prakity@marvell.com; linux-
> > mmc@vger.kernel.org; Su, Henry; Lu, Aaron; anath.amd@gmail.com
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 09/12] mmc: sd: add support for tuning during
> > uhs initialization
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-mmc-
> > > owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Nath, Arindam
> > > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 4:37 PM
> > > To: Subhash Jadavani; cjb@laptop.org
> > > Cc: zhangfei.gao@gmail.com; prakity@marvell.com; linux-
> > > mmc@vger.kernel.org; Su, Henry; Lu, Aaron; anath.amd@gmail.com
> > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 09/12] mmc: sd: add support for tuning
> during
> > > uhs initialization
> > >
> > > Hi Subhash,
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Subhash Jadavani [mailto:subhashj@codeaurora.org]
> > > > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 4:29 PM
> > > > To: Nath, Arindam; cjb@laptop.org
> > > > Cc: zhangfei.gao@gmail.com; prakity@marvell.com; linux-
> > > > mmc@vger.kernel.org; Su, Henry; Lu, Aaron; anath.amd@gmail.com
> > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 09/12] mmc: sd: add support for tuning
> > during
> > > > uhs initialization
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Arindam Nath [mailto:anath.amd@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> > > Arindam
> > > > > Nath
> > > > > Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 5:03 PM
> > > > > To: cjb@laptop.org
> > > > > Cc: zhangfei.gao@gmail.com; prakity@marvell.com;
> > > > > subhashj@codeaurora.org; linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org;
> > > henry.su@amd.com;
> > > > > aaron.lu@amd.com; anath.amd@gmail.com; Arindam Nath
> > > > > Subject: [PATCH v2 09/12] mmc: sd: add support for tuning
> during
> > > uhs
> > > > > initialization
> > > > >
> > > > > Host Controller needs tuning during initialization to operate
> > SDR50
> > > > > and SDR104 UHS-I cards. Whether SDR50 mode actually needs
> tuning
> > is
> > > > > indicated by bit 45 of the Host Controller Capabilities
> register.
> > > > > A new command CMD19 has been defined in the Physical Layer spec
> > > > > v3.01 to request the card to send tuning pattern.
> > > > >
> > > > > We enable Buffer Read Ready interrupt at the very begining of
> > > tuning
> > > > > procedure, because that is the only interrupt generated by the
> > Host
> > > > > Controller during tuning. The tuning block is sent by the card
> to
> > > the
> > > > > Host Controller using DAT lines, so we set Data Present Select
> > (bit
> > > > 5)
> > > > > in the Command register. The Host Controller is responsible for
> > > doing
> > > > > the verfication of tuning block sent by the card at the
> hardware
> > > > level.
> > > > > After sending CMD19, we wait for Buffer Read Ready interrupt.
> In
> > > case
> > > > > we don't receive an interrupt after the specified timeout
> value,
> > we
> > > > > fall back on fixed sampling clock by setting Execute Tuning
> (bit
> > 6)
> > > > > and Sampling Clock Seletc (bit 7) of Host Control2 register to
> 0.
> > > > > Before exiting the tuning procedure, we disable Buffer Read
> Ready
> > > > > interrupt.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Arindam Nath <arindam.nath@amd.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/mmc/core/sd.c     |    4 +
> > > > >  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c  |  137
> > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > > >  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h  |    3 +
> > > > >  include/linux/mmc/host.h  |    1 +
> > > > >  include/linux/mmc/mmc.h   |    1 +
> > > > >  include/linux/mmc/sdhci.h |    4 +
> > > > >  6 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c
> > > > > index be01397..1e2d157 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c
> > > > > @@ -637,6 +637,10 @@ static int mmc_sd_init_uhs_card(struct
> > > mmc_card
> > > > > *card)
> > > > >         /* Set current limit for the card */
> > > > >         err = sd_set_current_limit(card, status);
> > > > >
> > > > > +       /* SPI mode doesn't define CMD19 */
> > > > > +       if (!mmc_host_is_spi(card->host) && card->host->ops-
> > > > > >execute_tuning)
> > > > > +               card->host->ops->execute_tuning(card->host);
> > > > > +
> > > > >  out:
> > > > >         kfree(status);
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> > > > > index 245cc39..8f4f102 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> > > > > @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@
> > > > >  #define SDHCI_USE_LEDS_CLASS
> > > > >  #endif
> > > > >
> > > > > +#define MAX_TUNING_LOOP 40
> > > > > +
> > > > >  static unsigned int debug_quirks = 0;
> > > > >
> > > > >  static void sdhci_prepare_data(struct sdhci_host *, struct
> > > mmc_data
> > > > > *);
> > > > > @@ -985,7 +987,9 @@ static void sdhci_send_command(struct
> > > sdhci_host
> > > > > *host, struct mmc_command *cmd)
> > > > >                 flags |= SDHCI_CMD_CRC;
> > > > >         if (cmd->flags & MMC_RSP_OPCODE)
> > > > >                 flags |= SDHCI_CMD_INDEX;
> > > > > -       if (cmd->data)
> > > > > +
> > > > > +       /* CMD19 is special in that the Data Present Select
> should
> > be set
> > > > > */
> > > > > +       if (cmd->data || (cmd->opcode ==
> MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK))
> > > > >                 flags |= SDHCI_CMD_DATA;
> > > > >
> > > > >         sdhci_writew(host, SDHCI_MAKE_CMD(cmd->opcode, flags),
> > > > > SDHCI_COMMAND);
> > > > > @@ -1485,6 +1489,119 @@ static int
> > sdhci_get_max_current_180(struct
> > > > > mmc_host *mmc)
> > > > >         return max_current_180;
> > > > >  }
> > > > >
> > > > > +static void sdhci_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +       struct sdhci_host *host;
> > > > > +       u16 ctrl;
> > > > > +       int tuning_loop_counter = MAX_TUNING_LOOP;
> > > > > +       unsigned long flags;
> > > > > +       unsigned long timeout;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +       host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +       spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +       ctrl = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +       /*
> > > > > +        * Host Controller needs tuning only in case of SDR104
> mode
> > > > > +        * and for SDR50 mode when Use Tuning for SDR50 is set
> in
> > > > > +        * Capabilities register.
> > > > > +        */
> > > > > +       if ((ctrl & SDHCI_CTRL_UHS_SDR104) ||
> > > > > +           ((ctrl & SDHCI_CTRL_UHS_SDR50) &&
> > > > > +           (host->flags & SDHCI_SDR50_NEEDS_TUNING)))
> > > > > +               ctrl |= SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING;
> > > > > +       else {
> > > > > +               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
> > > > > +               return;
> > > > > +       }
> > > > > +
> > > > > +       sdhci_writew(host, ctrl, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +       /*
> > > > > +        * As per the Host Controller spec v3.00, tuning
> command
> > > > > +        * generates Buffer Read Ready interrupt, so enable
> that.
> > > > > +        */
> > > > > +       sdhci_unmask_irqs(host, SDHCI_INT_DATA_AVAIL);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +       /*
> > > > > +        * Issue CMD19 repeatedly till Execute Tuning is set to
> 0
> > or the
> > > > > number
> > > > > +        * of loops reaches 40 times or a timeout of 150ms
> occurs.
> > > > > +        */
> > > > > +       timeout = 150;
> > > > > +       do {
> > > > > +               struct mmc_command cmd;
> > > > > +               struct mmc_request mrq;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +               if (!tuning_loop_counter && !timeout)
> > > > > +                       break;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +               memset(&cmd, 0, sizeof(struct mmc_command));
> > > > > +               cmd.opcode = MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK;
> > > > > +               cmd.arg = 0;
> > > > > +               cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_R1 | MMC_CMD_ADTC;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +               memset(&cmd.resp, 0, sizeof(cmd.resp));
> > > > > +               cmd.retries = 0;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +               cmd.data = NULL;
> > > > > +               cmd.error = 0;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +               memset(&mrq, 0, sizeof(struct mmc_request));
> > > > > +               mrq.cmd = &cmd;
> > > > > +               host->mrq = &mrq;
> > > > > +               sdhci_send_command(host, &cmd);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +               host->cmd = NULL;
> > > > > +               host->mrq = NULL;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +               /* Wait for Buffer Read Ready interrupt */
> > > > > +               wait_event_interruptible_timeout(host-
> >buf_ready_int,
> > > > > +                                       (host->tuning_done ==
> 1),
> > > > > +                                       msecs_to_jiffies(50));
> > > > > +               spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +               if (!host->tuning_done) {
> > > > > +                       printk(KERN_INFO DRIVER_NAME ": Tuning
> > procedure"
> > > > > +                               " failed, falling back to fixed
> sampling"
> > > > > +                               " clock\n");
> > > > > +                       ctrl &= ~SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK;
> > > > > +                       ctrl &= ~SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING;
> > > > > +                       sdhci_writew(host, ctrl,
> SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +                       goto out;
> > > > > +               }
> > > > > +
> > > > > +               host->tuning_done = 0;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +               ctrl = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
> > > > > +               tuning_loop_counter--;
> > > > > +               timeout--;
> > > > > +               mdelay(1);
> > > > > +       } while (ctrl & SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +       /*
> > > > > +        * The Host Driver has exhausted the maximum number of
> > loops
> > > > > allowed,
> > > > > +        * so use fixed sampling frequency.
> > > > > +        */
> > > > > +       if (!tuning_loop_counter || !timeout) {
> > > > > +               ctrl &= ~SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK;
> > > > > +               sdhci_writew(host, ctrl, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
> > > > > +       } else {
> > > > > +               if (!(ctrl & SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK))
> > > > > +                       printk(KERN_INFO DRIVER_NAME ": Tuning
> > procedure"
> > > > > +                               " failed, falling back to fixed
> sampling"
> > > > > +                               " clock\n");
> > > > > +       }
> > > > > +
> > > > > +out:
> > > > > +       sdhci_mask_irqs(host, SDHCI_INT_DATA_AVAIL);
> > > > > +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > >  static const struct mmc_host_ops sdhci_ops = {
> > > > >         .request        = sdhci_request,
> > > > >         .set_ios        = sdhci_set_ios,
> > > > > @@ -1492,6 +1609,7 @@ static const struct mmc_host_ops
> sdhci_ops
> > =
> > > {
> > > > >         .enable_sdio_irq = sdhci_enable_sdio_irq,
> > > > >         .start_signal_voltage_switch    =
> > > > > sdhci_start_signal_voltage_switch,
> > > > >         .get_max_current_180            =
> sdhci_get_max_current_180,
> > > > > +       .execute_tuning                 = sdhci_execute_tuning,
> > > > >  };
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> /**********************************************************************
> > > > > *******\
> > > > > @@ -1703,6 +1821,16 @@ static void sdhci_data_irq(struct
> > sdhci_host
> > > > > *host, u32 intmask)
> > > > >  {
> > > > >         BUG_ON(intmask == 0);
> > > > >
> > > > > +       /* CMD19 generates _only_ Buffer Read Ready interrupt
> */
> > > > > +       if (intmask & SDHCI_INT_DATA_AVAIL) {
> > > > > +               if (SDHCI_GET_CMD(sdhci_readw(host,
> SDHCI_COMMAND))
> > > > > +                               == MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK) {
> > > > > +                       host->tuning_done = 1;
> > > > > +                       wake_up(&host->buf_ready_int);
> > > > > +                       return;
> > > > > +               }
> > > > > +       }
> > > > > +
> > > > >         if (!host->data) {
> > > > >                 /*
> > > > >                  * The "data complete" interrupt is also used
> to
> > > > > @@ -2126,6 +2254,10 @@ int sdhci_add_host(struct sdhci_host
> > *host)
> > > > >         if (caps[1] & SDHCI_SUPPORT_DDR50)
> > > > >                 mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_UHS_DDR50;
> > > > >
> > > > > +       /* Does the host needs tuning for SDR50? */
> > > > > +       if (caps[1] & SDHCI_USE_SDR50_TUNING)
> > > > > +               host->flags |= SDHCI_SDR50_NEEDS_TUNING;
> > > > > +
> > > > >         /* Driver Type(s) (A, C, D) supported by the host */
> > > > >         if (caps[1] & SDHCI_DRIVER_TYPE_A)
> > > > >                 mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_DRIVER_TYPE_A;
> > > > > @@ -2269,6 +2401,9 @@ int sdhci_add_host(struct sdhci_host
> *host)
> > > > >
> > > > >         setup_timer(&host->timer, sdhci_timeout_timer,
> (unsigned
> > > > > long)host);
> > > > >
> > > > > +       if (host->version >= SDHCI_SPEC_300)
> > > > > +               init_waitqueue_head(&host->buf_ready_int);
> > > > > +
> > > > >         ret = request_irq(host->irq, sdhci_irq, IRQF_SHARED,
> > > > >                 mmc_hostname(mmc), host);
> > > > >         if (ret)
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> > > > > index 5bf244d..4746879 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> > > > > @@ -160,6 +160,8 @@
> > > > >  #define  SDHCI_CTRL_DRV_TYPE_A         0x0010
> > > > >  #define  SDHCI_CTRL_DRV_TYPE_C         0x0020
> > > > >  #define  SDHCI_CTRL_DRV_TYPE_D         0x0030
> > > > > +#define  SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING                0x0040
> > > > > +#define  SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK          0x0080
> > > > >  #define  SDHCI_CTRL_PRESET_VAL_ENABLE  0x8000
> > > > >
> > > > >  #define SDHCI_CAPABILITIES     0x40
> > > > > @@ -187,6 +189,7 @@
> > > > >  #define  SDHCI_DRIVER_TYPE_A   0x00000010
> > > > >  #define  SDHCI_DRIVER_TYPE_C   0x00000020
> > > > >  #define  SDHCI_DRIVER_TYPE_D   0x00000040
> > > > > +#define  SDHCI_USE_SDR50_TUNING        0x00002000
> > > > >
> > > > >  #define SDHCI_CAPABILITIES_1   0x44
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> > > > > index e84cd05..651e40b 100644
> > > > > --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> > > > > +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> > > > > @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ struct mmc_host_ops {
> > > > >
> > > > >         int     (*start_signal_voltage_switch)(struct mmc_host
> > *host);
> > > > >         int     (*get_max_current_180)(struct mmc_host *mmc);
> > > > > +       void    (*execute_tuning)(struct mmc_host *host);
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Why execute_tuning ops return type is void? Will there not be any
> > > error
> > > > scenarios? What if host fails to find any tuning point? Shouldn't
> > it
> > > > return
> > > > error to the core layer and then core layer should not begin with
> > the
> > > > any
> > > > read/write operations?
> > >
> > > In case the tuning procedure fails, Host Controller falls back on
> > using
> > > Fixed Sampling clock, so data transfer can still continue.
> > >
> >
> > I think that's not a correct assumption. Let's say tuning fails and
> > host
> > controller falls back to fixed sampling clock and card still operates
> > in
> > SDR104 with CLK=208MHz. This means that all further read/write
> > transactions
> > will mainly result in CRC Fail errors and none of the transactions
> may
> > be
> > successful. So we can't just leave the host controller in state where
> > it
> > cannot perform high speed transfers (because it's tuning had failed)
> > and
> > then start issuing commands with high speed transfer conditions
> > (CLK=208MHz). Better way is for host to inform core layer that tuning
> > has
> > failed and then there should not be any further transactions with the
> > card
> > or fallback to low speed modes (SDR12, SDR25 or SDR50) or power cycle
> > the
> > card.
> 
> The host controller spec v3.00 clearly says that the occurrence of an
> error during tuning procedure is indicated by Sampling Select, which
> will be set to 0 in case tuning fails. But that won't stop the
> controller to retry re-tuning procedure based on the re-tuning mode. So
> I don't see any reason for transaction to be stopped in case tuning
> fails.

This capability is not there with host controller on our chipsets. So then
what to do? I think referring Host controller spec v3.00 should not be
proper here. As this spec is not a must condition for all host controller
implementations.


> 
> Thanks,
> Arindam
> 
> >
> >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Arindam
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >  };
> > > > >
> > > > >  struct mmc_card;
> > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h b/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
> > > > > index 612301f..9194f9e 100644
> > > > > --- a/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
> > > > > +++ b/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
> > > > > @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
> > > > >  #define MMC_SET_BLOCKLEN         16   /* ac   [31:0] block len
> > > R1
> > > > > */
> > > > >  #define MMC_READ_SINGLE_BLOCK    17   /* adtc [31:0] data addr
> > > R1
> > > > > */
> > > > >  #define MMC_READ_MULTIPLE_BLOCK  18   /* adtc [31:0] data addr
> > > R1
> > > > > */
> > > > > +#define MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK    19   /* adtc
> > > R1
> > > > > */
> > > > >
> > > > >    /* class 3 */
> > > > >  #define MMC_WRITE_DAT_UNTIL_STOP 20   /* adtc [31:0] data addr
> > > R1
> > > > > */
> > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/sdhci.h
> > b/include/linux/mmc/sdhci.h
> > > > > index 282d158..5203b97 100644
> > > > > --- a/include/linux/mmc/sdhci.h
> > > > > +++ b/include/linux/mmc/sdhci.h
> > > > > @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ struct sdhci_host {
> > > > >  #define SDHCI_USE_ADMA         (1<<1)  /* Host is ADMA capable
> > > > */
> > > > >  #define SDHCI_REQ_USE_DMA      (1<<2)  /* Use DMA for this
> > > req. */
> > > > >  #define SDHCI_DEVICE_DEAD      (1<<3)  /* Device unresponsive
> > > */
> > > > > +#define SDHCI_SDR50_NEEDS_TUNING (1<<4)        /* SDR50 needs
> tuning
> > > > */
> > > > >
> > > > >         unsigned int version;   /* SDHCI spec. version */
> > > > >
> > > > > @@ -147,6 +148,9 @@ struct sdhci_host {
> > > > >
> > > > >         struct mmc_command      *saved_abort_cmd; /* Abort
> command
> > saved
> > > > > for data error recovery */
> > > > >
> > > > > +       wait_queue_head_t       buf_ready_int;  /* Waitqueue
> for Buffer
> > Read
> > > > > Ready interrupt */
> > > > > +       unsigned int            tuning_done;    /* Condition
> flag
> > set
> > > > > when CMD19 succeeds */
> > > > > +
> > > > >         unsigned long private[0] ____cacheline_aligned;
> > > > >  };
> > > > >  #endif /* __SDHCI_H */
> > > > > --
> > > > > 1.7.1
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-
> mmc"
> > in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-23  6:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 125+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-04 11:32 [PATCH v2 00/12] add support for host controller v3.00 Arindam Nath
2011-03-04 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] mmc: sdhci: add support for auto CMD23 Arindam Nath
2011-03-09 12:22   ` subhashj
2011-03-09 12:55     ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-15 11:23   ` Subhash Jadavani
2011-03-15 11:35     ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-15 11:52       ` Subhash Jadavani
2011-03-16  6:07         ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-04 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] mmc: sd: add support for signal voltage switch procedure Arindam Nath
2011-03-04 11:47   ` Wolfram Sang
2011-03-04 11:52     ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-09 10:44   ` subhashj
2011-03-10  6:30     ` subhashj
2011-03-10  8:05       ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-09 12:45   ` zhangfei gao
2011-03-10  8:11     ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-15 10:18   ` Subhash Jadavani
2011-03-15 10:32     ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-15 11:18       ` Subhash Jadavani
2011-03-15 11:28         ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-15 11:58           ` Subhash Jadavani
2011-03-16  3:03             ` zhangfei gao
2011-03-16  6:30               ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-16 10:44                 ` zhangfei gao
2011-03-16 10:48                   ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-16 21:39   ` Philip Rakity
2011-03-17  4:18     ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-24 10:52   ` zhangfei gao
2011-03-24 10:59     ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-04 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] mmc: sd: query function modes for uhs cards Arindam Nath
2011-03-09 14:08   ` subhashj
2011-03-09 14:31     ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-09 18:04       ` subhashj
2011-03-09 18:16         ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-04 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] mmc: sd: add support for driver type selection Arindam Nath
2011-03-09  5:33   ` Philip Rakity
2011-03-09  8:11     ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-10  6:57   ` subhashj
2011-03-10  8:31     ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-10 10:28       ` subhashj
2011-03-10 10:44         ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-10 11:25           ` subhashj
2011-03-10 11:34             ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-04 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] mmc: sdhci: reset sdclk before setting high speed enable Arindam Nath
2011-03-05  4:57   ` Philip Rakity
2011-03-05  5:07     ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-04 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] mmc: sd: add support for uhs bus speed mode selection Arindam Nath
2011-03-10  8:00   ` subhashj
2011-03-10  8:36     ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-10 10:07       ` subhashj
2011-03-10 10:15         ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-21  6:42   ` Subhash Jadavani
2011-03-23  6:04     ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-23  6:14       ` Subhash Jadavani
2011-03-23  6:17         ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-23  6:26           ` Subhash Jadavani
2011-03-23  6:35             ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-23  7:23               ` Subhash Jadavani
2011-03-23 14:02                 ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-24  7:25                   ` Subhash Jadavani
2011-03-24  8:42                     ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-04 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] mmc: sd: set current limit for uhs cards Arindam Nath
2011-03-09 21:41   ` Philip Rakity
2011-03-10  3:12     ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-10  8:16   ` subhashj
2011-03-10  8:43     ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-10  9:45       ` subhashj
2011-03-16 14:26   ` Philip Rakity
2011-03-16 14:32     ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-16 14:51       ` Philip Rakity
2011-03-16 15:00         ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-16 15:18           ` Philip Rakity
2011-03-16 15:24             ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-16 15:31               ` Philip Rakity
2011-03-16 15:33                 ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-16 15:34                   ` Philip Rakity
2011-03-21  7:43   ` Subhash Jadavani
2011-03-21  7:54     ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-04 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] mmc: sd: report correct speed and capacity of " Arindam Nath
2011-03-10 11:48   ` subhashj
2011-03-10 13:28     ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-10 13:41       ` subhashj
2011-03-04 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] mmc: sd: add support for tuning during uhs initialization Arindam Nath
2011-03-04 18:27   ` Philip Rakity
2011-03-04 18:48     ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-04 18:34   ` Philip Rakity
2011-03-04 18:54     ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-15 10:32   ` zhangfei gao
2011-03-15 10:43     ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-16  2:51       ` zhangfei gao
2011-03-16  6:20         ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-16 10:18           ` zhangfei gao
2011-03-21  9:43   ` Subhash Jadavani
2011-03-21  9:50     ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-23  6:58       ` Subhash Jadavani
2011-03-21 10:58   ` Subhash Jadavani
2011-03-21 11:07     ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-23  6:08       ` Subhash Jadavani
2011-03-23  6:14         ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-23  6:19           ` Subhash Jadavani [this message]
2011-03-23  6:22             ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-23  6:34               ` Subhash Jadavani
2011-03-23  6:41                 ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-23  6:45                   ` Subhash Jadavani
2011-03-23  6:48                     ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-04 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] mmc: sdhci: enable preset value after " Arindam Nath
2011-03-10 13:23   ` subhashj
2011-03-10 13:30     ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-10 13:45       ` subhashj
2011-03-10 13:49         ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-10 14:03           ` subhashj
2011-03-10 14:07             ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-10 14:12               ` subhashj
2011-03-10 14:15                 ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-10 14:19                   ` subhashj
2011-03-10 14:24                     ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-04 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] mmc: sdhci: add support for programmable clock mode Arindam Nath
2011-03-04 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] mmc: sdhci: add support for retuning mode 1 Arindam Nath
2011-03-10 13:57   ` subhashj
2011-03-10 14:00     ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-04 15:16 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] add support for host controller v3.00 Chris Ball
2011-03-04 15:55   ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-11 13:13 ` subhashj
2011-03-11 15:29   ` Nath, Arindam
2011-03-11 16:06     ` Chris Ball

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='000f01cbe922$54219d00$fc64d700$@org' \
    --to=subhashj@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=Aaron.Lu@amd.com \
    --cc=Arindam.Nath@amd.com \
    --cc=Henry.Su@amd.com \
    --cc=anath.amd@gmail.com \
    --cc=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=prakity@marvell.com \
    --cc=zhangfei.gao@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).