[PATCH] mmc: dw-mmc: fixed secstion mismatch in reference

[PATCH] mmc: dw-mmc: fixed secstion mismatch in reference

[Jaehoon Chung]

Fixed the below message.

WARNING: drivers/mmc/host/built-in.o(.text+0x5ee8): Section mismatch in reference from the function dw_mci_probe() to the function .init.text:dw_mci_init_slot()
The function dw_mci_probe() references
the function __init dw_mci_init_slot().
This is often because dw_mci_probe lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of dw_mci_init_slot is wrong

Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
index 72dc3cd..7955eba 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
@@ -1760,7 +1760,7 @@ static void dw_mci_work_routine_card(struct work_struct *work)
 	}
 }
 
-static int __init dw_mci_init_slot(struct dw_mci *host, unsigned int id)
+static int dw_mci_init_slot(struct dw_mci *host, unsigned int id)
 {
 	struct mmc_host *mmc;
 	struct dw_mci_slot *slot;
-- 
1.7.4.1

RE: [PATCH] mmc: dw-mmc: fixed secstion mismatch in reference

[Seungwon Jeon]

Hi Jaehoon,

July 20, 2012, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
> Fixed the below message.
> 
> WARNING: drivers/mmc/host/built-in.o(.text+0x5ee8): Section mismatch in reference from the function
> dw_mci_probe() to the function .init.text:dw_mci_init_slot()
> The function dw_mci_probe() references
> the function __init dw_mci_init_slot().
> This is often because dw_mci_probe lacks a __init
> annotation or the annotation of dw_mci_init_slot is wrong
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> index 72dc3cd..7955eba 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> @@ -1760,7 +1760,7 @@ static void dw_mci_work_routine_card(struct work_struct *work)
>  	}
>  }
> 
> -static int __init dw_mci_init_slot(struct dw_mci *host, unsigned int id)
> +static int dw_mci_init_slot(struct dw_mci *host, unsigned int id)
>  {
>  	struct mmc_host *mmc;
>  	struct dw_mci_slot *slot;


__init macro isn't required?
If so, how about adding __init macros to dw_mci_probe and dw_mci_pltfm_probe?

Best regards,
Seungwon Jeon
> --
> 1.7.4.1
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH] mmc: dw-mmc: fixed secstion mismatch in reference

[Jaehoon Chung]

Hi Seungwon,

On 07/20/2012 08:36 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> Hi Jaehoon,
> 
> July 20, 2012, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
>> Fixed the below message.
>>
>> WARNING: drivers/mmc/host/built-in.o(.text+0x5ee8): Section mismatch in reference from the function
>> dw_mci_probe() to the function .init.text:dw_mci_init_slot()
>> The function dw_mci_probe() references
>> the function __init dw_mci_init_slot().
>> This is often because dw_mci_probe lacks a __init
>> annotation or the annotation of dw_mci_init_slot is wrong
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c |    2 +-
>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> index 72dc3cd..7955eba 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> @@ -1760,7 +1760,7 @@ static void dw_mci_work_routine_card(struct work_struct *work)
>>  	}
>>  }
>>
>> -static int __init dw_mci_init_slot(struct dw_mci *host, unsigned int id)
>> +static int dw_mci_init_slot(struct dw_mci *host, unsigned int id)
>>  {
>>  	struct mmc_host *mmc;
>>  	struct dw_mci_slot *slot;
> 
> 
> __init macro isn't required?
> If so, how about adding __init macros to dw_mci_probe and dw_mci_pltfm_probe?
As you're mentioned, I think right that add __init macro to dw_mci_pltfm_probe.
but dw_mci_probe? i didn't think so...

Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
> 
> Best regards,
> Seungwon Jeon
>> --
>> 1.7.4.1
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> 

RE: [PATCH] mmc: dw-mmc: fixed secstion mismatch in reference

[Seungwon Jeon]

July 23, 2012, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> wrote:
> Hi Seungwon,
> 
> On 07/20/2012 08:36 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> > Hi Jaehoon,
> >
> > July 20, 2012, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
> >> Fixed the below message.
> >>
> >> WARNING: drivers/mmc/host/built-in.o(.text+0x5ee8): Section mismatch in reference from the function
> >> dw_mci_probe() to the function .init.text:dw_mci_init_slot()
> >> The function dw_mci_probe() references
> >> the function __init dw_mci_init_slot().
> >> This is often because dw_mci_probe lacks a __init
> >> annotation or the annotation of dw_mci_init_slot is wrong
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c |    2 +-
> >>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> >> index 72dc3cd..7955eba 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> >> @@ -1760,7 +1760,7 @@ static void dw_mci_work_routine_card(struct work_struct *work)
> >>  	}
> >>  }
> >>
> >> -static int __init dw_mci_init_slot(struct dw_mci *host, unsigned int id)
> >> +static int dw_mci_init_slot(struct dw_mci *host, unsigned int id)
> >>  {
> >>  	struct mmc_host *mmc;
> >>  	struct dw_mci_slot *slot;
> >
> >
> > __init macro isn't required?
> > If so, how about adding __init macros to dw_mci_probe and dw_mci_pltfm_probe?
> As you're mentioned, I think right that add __init macro to dw_mci_pltfm_probe.
> but dw_mci_probe? i didn't think so...
Yes, dw_mci_pltfm_probe is only proper.

Thanks,
Seungwon Jeon

> 
> Best Regards,
> Jaehoon Chung
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Seungwon Jeon
> >> --
> >> 1.7.4.1
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html