From: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com>
To: 'Sonny Rao' <sonnyrao@chromium.org>,
'Jaehoon Chung' <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Cc: 'Yuvaraj Kumar' <yuvaraj.cd@gmail.com>,
'Grant Grundler' <grundler@chromium.org>,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
'Chris Ball' <cjb@laptop.org>,
'linux-mmc' <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
kgene.kim@samsung.com, 'sunil joshi' <joshi@samsung.com>,
'Tomasz Figa' <t.figa@samsung.com>,
'Yuvaraj Kumar C D' <yuvaraj.cd@samsung.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: change to use recommended reset procedure
Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 23:08:50 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001f01cf6c59$5e3e8b00$1abba100$%jun@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPz6YkUjLmWXvoCkuY8vAwLHksf0Uit6gWP-ADWBbN3NDJBo-w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Sonny,
Can you separate procedure?
Reset all are handled in fifo-reset.
And ciu reset is always needed for error handling?
Thanks,
Seungwon Jeon
On Sat, May 10, 2014, Sonny Rao wrote:
> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:32 AM, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> wrote:
> > Hi, Sonny.
> >
> > You can discard the my previous some comment.
> > As you mentioned, this reset sequence is recommended at Synopsys TRM.
> >
> > Add the minor question.
> >
> > On 05/09/2014 01:27 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> >> Hi, Sonny.
> >>
> >> I have checked the Synopsys TRM..
> >>
> >> On 05/09/2014 10:34 AM, Sonny Rao wrote:
> >>> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> wrote:
> >>>> On 05/08/2014 06:40 PM, Yuvaraj Kumar wrote:
> >>>>> Any comments on this patch?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Yuvaraj Kumar C D <yuvaraj.cd@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> From: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@chromium.org>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This patch changes the fifo reset code to follow the reset procedure
> >>>>>> outlined in the documentation of Synopsys Mobile storage host databook
> >>>>>> 7.2.13.
> >>>>>> Without this patch, we could able to see eMMC was not detected after
> >>>>>> multiple reboots due to driver hangs while eMMC tuning for HS200.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@chromium.org>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yuvaraj Kumar C D <yuvaraj.cd@samsung.org>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>>>>> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h | 1 +
> >>>>>> 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> >>>>>> index 32dd81d..1d77431 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> >>>>>> @@ -2220,7 +2220,53 @@ static inline bool dw_mci_fifo_reset(struct dw_mci *host)
> >>>>>> host->sg = NULL;
> >>>>>> }
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> - return dw_mci_ctrl_reset(host, SDMMC_CTRL_FIFO_RESET);
> >>>>>> + /*
> >>>>>> + * The recommended method for resetting is to always reset the
> >>>>>> + * controller and the fifo, but differs slightly depending on the mode.
> >>>>>> + * Note that this doesn't handle the "generic DMA" (not IDMAC) case.
> >>>>>> + */
> >>>>
> >>>> "not IDMAC" is confused..
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> The documentation describes three different possible modes. There's a
> >>> mode that doesn't use IDMAC but still does DMA. But as far as I can
> >>> tell this driver doesn't support that way. We can just remove that
> >>> wording if it's confusing.
> >
> > How did it know whether dma is generic DMA or not?
> >
>
> That's a good question. I wasn't sure whether the driver supported it
> or not. It looks like it definitely supports IDMAC through the
> CONFIG_MMC_DW_IDMAC flag, but I wasn't sure if it was supported the
> generic dma. Maybe if CONFIG_MMC_DW_IDMAC isn't specified but
> host->dma_ops is not NULL then we are using the generic dma mode.
>
> >>>
> >>>>>> + if (dw_mci_ctrl_reset(host, SDMMC_CTRL_RESET | SDMMC_CTRL_FIFO_RESET)) {
> >>>>>> + unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(500);
> >>>>>> + u32 status, rint;
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + /* if using dma we wait for dma_req to clear */
> >>>>>> + if (host->using_dma) {
> >>>>>> + do {
> >>>>>> + status = mci_readl(host, STATUS);
> >>>>>> + if (!(status & SDMMC_STATUS_DMA_REQ))
> >>>>>> + break;
> >>>>>> + cpu_relax();
> >>>>>> + } while (time_before(jiffies, timeout));
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + if (status & SDMMC_STATUS_DMA_REQ)
> >>>>>> + dev_err(host->dev,
> >>>>>> + "%s: Timeout waiting for dma_req to "
> >>>>>> + "clear during reset", __func__);
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + /* when using DMA next we reset the fifo again */
> >>>>>> + dw_mci_ctrl_reset(host, SDMMC_CTRL_FIFO_RESET);
> >>>>>> + }
> >>>>>> + /*
> >>>>>> + * In all cases we clear the RAWINTS register to clear any
> >>>>>> + * interrupts.
> >>>>>> + */
> >>>>>> + rint = mci_readl(host, RINTSTS);
> >>>>>> + rint = rint & (~mci_readl(host, MINTSTS));
> >> you use the "status or temp" instead of rint. (you can reuse the variable.)
> >> And can use "status &= ~mci_readl(host,MINTSTS);"
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>> Just clear the RINTSTS register? why do you add these?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> This will look at what is not masked, and only clear those bits.
> >> Well, i known if clear the RINTSTS register,
> >> recommended to use "0xfffffff" and set the value for interrupt.
> >
> > Can be used "0xfffffff"?
> >
>
> Yeah we probably can. We just lose information about interrupts that
> were masked, but maybe we just don't care about any of them anyway, so
> it doesn't matter.
>
> > Best Regards,
> > Jaehoon Chung
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>>> + if (rint)
> >>>>>> + mci_writel(host, RINTSTS, rint);
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + } else
> >>>>>> + dev_err(host->dev, "%s: Reset bits didn't clear", __func__);
> >>>>
> >>>> Just display the error log? I didn't understand this.
> >>>> If you displayed the error log, then it needs to return the error value.
> >>>>
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + #ifdef CONFIG_MMC_DW_IDMAC
> >>>>>> + /* It is also recommended that we reset and reprogram idmac */
> >>>>>> + dw_mci_idmac_reset(host);
> >>>>>> + #endif
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + /* After a CTRL reset we need to have CIU set clock registers */
> >>>>>> + mci_send_cmd(host->cur_slot, SDMMC_CMD_UPD_CLK, 0);
> >>
> >> Well, why do you send the clock update command?
> >> I didn't see that update the value related with clock.
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Jaehoon Chung
> >>
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + return true;
> >>>>>> }
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> static inline bool dw_mci_ctrl_all_reset(struct dw_mci *host)
> >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
> >>>>>> index 738fa24..037e47a 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
> >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
> >>>>>> @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@
> >>>>>> #define SDMMC_CMD_INDX(n) ((n) & 0x1F)
> >>>>>> /* Status register defines */
> >>>>>> #define SDMMC_GET_FCNT(x) (((x)>>17) & 0x1FFF)
> >>>>>> +#define SDMMC_STATUS_DMA_REQ BIT(31)
> >>>>>> /* FIFOTH register defines */
> >>>>>> #define SDMMC_SET_FIFOTH(m, r, t) (((m) & 0x7) << 28 | \
> >>>>>> ((r) & 0xFFF) << 16 | \
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> 1.7.10.4
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>> --
> >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> >>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >>
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-10 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-26 11:46 [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: change to use recommended reset procedure Yuvaraj Kumar C D
2014-05-08 9:40 ` Yuvaraj Kumar
2014-05-09 1:15 ` Jaehoon Chung
2014-05-09 1:34 ` Sonny Rao
2014-05-09 4:27 ` Jaehoon Chung
2014-05-09 7:32 ` Jaehoon Chung
2014-05-10 3:36 ` Sonny Rao
2014-05-10 14:08 ` Seungwon Jeon [this message]
2014-05-12 21:14 ` Sonny Rao
2014-05-12 21:44 ` Sonny Rao
2014-05-13 0:40 ` Sonny Rao
2014-05-13 10:13 ` James Hogan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-05-22 18:54 [PATCHv2] " Sonny Rao
2014-05-29 0:35 ` [PATCH] " Sonny Rao
2014-05-29 5:17 ` Jaehoon Chung
2014-06-09 21:35 ` Sonny Rao
2014-06-09 22:00 ` Sonny Rao
2014-07-10 12:28 ` Seungwon Jeon
2014-07-10 22:35 ` Sonny Rao
2014-07-11 10:20 ` Seungwon Jeon
2014-07-11 19:48 ` Sonny Rao
[not found] <CAPDyKFq2isO+DKMuLT9Ud8B9reFZiVYKG6LL8ysF0ZTNGfY8Nw@mail.gmail.com>
2014-08-05 1:19 ` Sonny Rao
2014-08-07 8:40 ` Jaehoon Chung
2014-08-11 7:55 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001f01cf6c59$5e3e8b00$1abba100$%jun@samsung.com' \
--to=tgih.jun@samsung.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=grundler@chromium.org \
--cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=joshi@samsung.com \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sonnyrao@chromium.org \
--cc=t.figa@samsung.com \
--cc=yuvaraj.cd@gmail.com \
--cc=yuvaraj.cd@samsung.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox