From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Seungwon Jeon Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3] dw_mmc: Don't loop when handling an interrupt Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 23:22:40 +0900 Message-ID: <002501ce1ff6$38e3c470$aaab4d50$%jun@samsung.com> References: <1363085593-22214-1-git-send-email-markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ks_c_5601-1987 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout2.samsung.com ([203.254.224.25]:26483 "EHLO mailout2.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751901Ab3CMOWn (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:22:43 -0400 In-reply-to: <1363085593-22214-1-git-send-email-markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Content-language: ko Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: 'Markos Chandras' , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 'Jaehoon Chung' , 'Chris Ball' On Tuesday, March 12, 2013, Markos Chandras wrote: > There is no reason to loop when handling an interrupt. The "if" clauses > will handle all of them sequentially. This also eliminates the extra loop > we used to take with no pending interrupts and we ended up breaking out > of the while loop. > > Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras > Cc: Seungwon Jeon Acked-by: Seungwon Jeon You can add my ack to other patches. However, could you change the subject prefix to 'mmc: dw_mmc' and resend? Thanks, Seungwon Jeon