From: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com>
To: 'Jaehoon Chung' <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
'linux-mmc' <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: 'Chris Ball' <cjb@laptop.org>,
'Kyungmin Park' <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
'Will Newton' <will.newton@imgtec.com>,
'Thomas Abraham' <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/5] mmc: dw-mmc: ensure that the card is not busy when changing clock
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:21:35 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <003501cd8584$a1cd8370$e5688a50$%jun@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <503C797D.4040404@samsung.com>
On Tuesday, August 28, 2012, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> wrote:
> synopsys spec is mentioned. (7.1 Software/Hardware Restrictions)
> "Before disabling clock, ensure that card is not busy due to any previous data command."
>
> At specific board, i found the problem that didn't inform ciu.
> (It didn't produce always.)
> At that time, i checked the status register whether card is busy or not.
> (Start bit of CMD register is cleared, but card is busy.)
> Current code didn't check the card status. Just check whether the start-bit cleared.
> host regard that command is completed, will send the next command.
> But next command didn't issue because Card is busy.
> This patch can prevent this situation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> index 36f98c0..e30d3ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> @@ -623,6 +623,24 @@ static void mci_send_cmd(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, u32 cmd, u32 arg)
> cmd, arg, cmd_status);
> }
>
> +static void dw_mci_inform_ciu(struct dw_mci_slot *slot)
> +{
> + struct dw_mci *host = slot->host;
> + unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(10);
10ms is from test?
> + u32 ctrl, status;
> +
> + do {
> + status = mci_readl(host, STATUS);
> + if (!(status & SDMMC_DATA_BUSY))
> + break;
> + ctrl = mci_readl(host, CTRL);
> + ctrl |= SDMMC_CTRL_RESET;
> + mci_writel(host, CTRL, ctrl);
> + } while (time_before(jiffies, timeout));
> +
> + mci_send_cmd(slot, SDMMC_CMD_UPD_CLK | SDMMC_CMD_PRV_DAT_WAIT, 0);
> +}
> +
> static void dw_mci_setup_bus(struct dw_mci_slot *slot)
> {
> struct dw_mci *host = slot->host;
> @@ -650,15 +668,13 @@ static void dw_mci_setup_bus(struct dw_mci_slot *slot)
According to your quotation of manual("Before disabling clock, ...),
Place of dw_mci_inform_ciu is proper here?
dw_mci_inform_ciu(slot);
/* disable clock */
mci_writel(host, CLKENA, 0);
mci_writel(host, CLKSRC, 0);
> mci_writel(host, CLKSRC, 0);
>
> /* inform CIU */
> - mci_send_cmd(slot,
> - SDMMC_CMD_UPD_CLK | SDMMC_CMD_PRV_DAT_WAIT, 0);
> + dw_mci_inform_ciu(slot);
>
> /* set clock to desired speed */
> mci_writel(host, CLKDIV, div);
>
> /* inform CIU */
> - mci_send_cmd(slot,
> - SDMMC_CMD_UPD_CLK | SDMMC_CMD_PRV_DAT_WAIT, 0);
> + dw_mci_inform_ciu(slot);
And then, since start to change clock sequence, there is no need to check busy-status.
Just need to update clock with origin code.
>
> /* enable clock; only low power if no SDIO */
> clk_en_a = SDMMC_CLKEN_ENABLE << slot->id;
> @@ -667,8 +683,7 @@ static void dw_mci_setup_bus(struct dw_mci_slot *slot)
> mci_writel(host, CLKENA, clk_en_a);
>
> /* inform CIU */
> - mci_send_cmd(slot,
> - SDMMC_CMD_UPD_CLK | SDMMC_CMD_PRV_DAT_WAIT, 0);
> + dw_mci_inform_ciu(slot);
Same here.
Thanks,
Seungwon Jeon
>
> host->current_speed = slot->clock;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
> index 15c27e1..b6a1a78 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
> @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@
> #define SDMMC_CMD_INDX(n) ((n) & 0x1F)
> /* Status register defines */
> #define SDMMC_GET_FCNT(x) (((x)>>17) & 0x1FFF)
> +#define SDMMC_DATA_BUSY BIT(9)
> /* Internal DMAC interrupt defines */
> #define SDMMC_IDMAC_INT_AI BIT(9)
> #define SDMMC_IDMAC_INT_NI BIT(8)
> --
> 1.7.4.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-29 1:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-28 7:55 [PATCH v2 1/5] mmc: dw-mmc: ensure that the card is not busy when changing clock Jaehoon Chung
2012-08-29 1:21 ` Seungwon Jeon [this message]
2012-08-29 2:02 ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-08-30 1:19 ` Seungwon Jeon
2012-08-30 2:25 ` Jaehoon Chung
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='003501cd8584$a1cd8370$e5688a50$%jun@samsung.com' \
--to=tgih.jun@samsung.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.abraham@linaro.org \
--cc=will.newton@imgtec.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox