linux-mmc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Tanya Brokhman" <tlinder@codeaurora.org>
To: 'Jaehoon Chung' <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] ROW scheduling Algorithm
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 13:37:22 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <004101cd7551$cd269130$6773b390$@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <502214E8.7070603@samsung.com>

Hi Chung

> Hi
> 
> I tested with this patch on my board.
> But i didn't get any performance benefit.
> Which benchmark did you use?

As I already mentioned I used lmdd. The results I published were collected using the bellow command run in parallel:
adb shell /data/lmdd if=internal of=/data/writefile bs=128k count=3000
adb shell /data/lmdd if=/data/readfile of=internal bs=128k count=3000

With lmdd we did see great improvement both in throughput and in read latency:
CFQ:	     READ  20.81 MB/sec,    WRITE  15.23 MB/sec   Worst case READ latency 230 msec     Worst case write latency   9370   msec
ROW:         READ  27.75 MB/sec      WRITE  15.34 MB/sec   Worst case READ latency   85 msec     Worst case write latency   12025 msec

ROW can be configured to perform at ~34 MB/sec throughput in the above scenario but in this configuration worst case write latency increases to ~13 sec.

> And sometime this scheduler didn't work well read/write operation.
> (i didn't know exactly what problem.)

This may be. We're still working on testing the scheduler and improving it. It's not yet totally "bug free". I've uploaded the code as RFC. 

> 
> The below is my environment:
> Kernel Version: linux-3.4
> Card: eMMC4.5 (50MHz DDR mode, 8-bit buswidth) Host controller : dw-
> mmc (DesignWare MMC controller) Benchmark : IOzone
> 

My environment is similar except the host controller which is msm-sdcc. 
Could you please give me the exact iozone command you used? I'll replay it on my setup.

Thanks,
Tanya Brokhman
---
Sent by an consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-08 10:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-05 11:30 [RFC/PATCH 0/2] ROW scheduling Algorithm Tatyana Brokhman
2012-08-05 11:30 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/2] block: Expose kblock_schedule_delayed_work() Tatyana Brokhman
2012-08-05 11:30 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/2] block: Adding ROW scheduling algorithm Tatyana Brokhman
2012-08-06 16:35   ` Jeff Moyer
2012-08-07 11:28     ` Tanya Brokhman
2012-09-19  5:29     ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-08-08  7:27 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/2] ROW scheduling Algorithm Jaehoon Chung
2012-08-08 10:37   ` Tanya Brokhman [this message]
2012-08-08 11:57     ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-08-09  5:06   ` Tanya Brokhman
2012-08-14 19:09     ` Jae hoon Chung
2012-08-20  8:44     ` Seungwon Jeon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='004101cd7551$cd269130$6773b390$@codeaurora.org' \
    --to=tlinder@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).