From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 3/3] sdhci-s3c: Add SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_WP_BIT quirk for Samsung SoC Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:42:56 +0900 Message-ID: <008b01cb2e0f$5c2de590$1489b0b0$%kim@samsung.com> References: <1279886191-9197-1-git-send-email-kgene.kim@samsung.com> <1279886191-9197-4-git-send-email-kgene.kim@samsung.com> <4C49871D.8030702@gmail.com> <000d01cb2d83$16b7efb0$4427cf10$%kim@samsung.com> <4C4F06EC.2020902@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: In-reply-to: <4C4F06EC.2020902@gmail.com> Content-language: ko Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: 'Maurus Cuelenaere' Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, ben-linux@fluff.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, 'Hyuk Lee' List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Maurus Cuelenaere wrote: > > Op 27-07-10 13:58, Kukjin Kim schreef: > > Maurus Cuelenaere wrote: > >> Op 23-07-10 13:56, Kukjin Kim schreef: > >>> From: Hyuk Lee > >>> > >>> If host controller doesn't have WP pin which should be connnected with > SDMMC > >>> card WP pin, can implement get_ro function with using the allocated gpio. > >>> In order to use this quirk wp_gpio in the platform data must be set. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Hyuk Lee > >>> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim > >>> --- > >>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c | 43 > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 3 ++ > >>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h | 3 ++ > >>> 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c > >>> index 0d25285..0b75e57 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c > >>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ > >>> > >>> #include > >>> > >>> +#include > >>> #include > >>> #include > >>> > >>> @@ -213,6 +214,36 @@ static void sdhci_s3c_set_clock(struct sdhci_host > *host, > >> unsigned int clock) > >>> } > >>> > >>> /** > >>> + * sdhci_s3c_get_ro - callback for get_ro > >>> + * @host: The SDHCI host being changed > >>> + * > >>> + * If the WP pin is connected with GPIO, can get the value which indicates > >>> + * the card is locked or not. > >>> +*/ > >>> +static int sdhci_s3c_get_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc) > >>> +{ > >>> + struct sdhci_s3c *sc; > >>> + struct sdhci_host *host; > >>> + > >>> + host = mmc_priv(mmc); > >>> + sc = sdhci_priv(host); > >> This can be done as static initializer if you reverse the order above. > > Could you please kindly explain about this? > > Sorry, I cannot get the exactly meaning... > > +static int sdhci_s3c_get_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc) > +{ > + struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc); > + struct sdhci_s3c *sc = sdhci_priv(host); > Hahaha, no need more words ;-) Thanks for your kindly explanation. I think, v4 patch seems to satisfy your suggestion...even though need v5 patch right now. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim , Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.