From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: haibo.chen@nxp.com, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-imx@nxp.com, sherry.sun@nxp.com, shawnguo@kernel.org,
s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de,
festevam@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: reset the tuning logic before execute tuning
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 12:16:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <04db7720-c13c-2a32-c0ea-a8e72052807c@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1666947869-7904-1-git-send-email-haibo.chen@nxp.com>
On 28/10/22 12:04, haibo.chen@nxp.com wrote:
> From: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@nxp.com>
>
> For standard tuning method on usdhc, the previous tuning result can
> impact current tuning result, let current tuning can't set the correct
> delay cell. And from the logic, this is also reasonable for manual
> tuning method. So reset the tuning logic before execute tuning.
> To avoid compile issue, this patch also move the esdhc_reset_tuning()
> upper.
>
> Find this issue when support SDIO WiFi in band wakeup feature. After
> system resume back, will do re-tuning, but then meet data CRC error.
>
> Do not meet this issue on SD/eMMC, because we already call
> esdhc_reset_tuning() when config the legency ios, and SD/eMMC need
> to re-init when system resume back, but SDIO device don't do re-init
> if it has MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER pm_flags.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@nxp.com>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> index b073e79dcd99..4559599d897d 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> @@ -1012,6 +1012,44 @@ static void esdhc_pltfm_set_bus_width(struct sdhci_host *host, int width)
> SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL);
> }
>
> +static void esdhc_reset_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host)
> +{
> + struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> + struct pltfm_imx_data *imx_data = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
> + u32 ctrl;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Reset the tuning circuit */
> + if (esdhc_is_usdhc(imx_data)) {
> + if (imx_data->socdata->flags & ESDHC_FLAG_MAN_TUNING) {
> + ctrl = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
> + ctrl &= ~ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SMPCLK_SEL;
> + ctrl &= ~ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_FBCLK_SEL;
> + writel(ctrl, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
> + writel(0, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STATUS);
> + } else if (imx_data->socdata->flags & ESDHC_FLAG_STD_TUNING) {
> + ctrl = readl(host->ioaddr + SDHCI_AUTO_CMD_STATUS);
> + ctrl &= ~ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SMPCLK_SEL;
> + ctrl &= ~ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_EXE_TUNE;
> + writel(ctrl, host->ioaddr + SDHCI_AUTO_CMD_STATUS);
> + /* Make sure ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_EXE_TUNE cleared */
> + ret = readl_poll_timeout(host->ioaddr + SDHCI_AUTO_CMD_STATUS,
> + ctrl, !(ctrl & ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_EXE_TUNE), 1, 50);
> + if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
> + dev_warn(mmc_dev(host->mmc),
> + "Warning! clear execute tuning bit failed\n");
> + /*
> + * SDHCI_INT_DATA_AVAIL is W1C bit, set this bit will clear the
> + * usdhc IP internal logic flag execute_tuning_with_clr_buf, which
> + * will finally make sure the normal data transfer logic correct.
> + */
> + ctrl = readl(host->ioaddr + SDHCI_INT_STATUS);
> + ctrl |= SDHCI_INT_DATA_AVAIL;
> + writel(ctrl, host->ioaddr + SDHCI_INT_STATUS);
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int usdhc_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
> {
> struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> @@ -1023,6 +1061,12 @@ static int usdhc_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
> if (host->timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_DDR50)
> return 0;
>
> + /*
> + * Reset tuning circuit logic. If not, the previous tuning result
> + * will impact current tuning, make current tuning can't set the
> + * correct delay cell.
> + */
> + esdhc_reset_tuning(host);
> return sdhci_execute_tuning(mmc, opcode);
> }
>
> @@ -1196,44 +1240,6 @@ static void esdhc_set_strobe_dll(struct sdhci_host *host)
> "warning! HS400 strobe DLL status REF/SLV not lock in 50us, STROBE DLL status is %x!\n", v);
> }
>
> -static void esdhc_reset_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host)
> -{
> - struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> - struct pltfm_imx_data *imx_data = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
> - u32 ctrl;
> - int ret;
> -
> - /* Reset the tuning circuit */
> - if (esdhc_is_usdhc(imx_data)) {
> - if (imx_data->socdata->flags & ESDHC_FLAG_MAN_TUNING) {
> - ctrl = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
> - ctrl &= ~ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SMPCLK_SEL;
> - ctrl &= ~ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_FBCLK_SEL;
> - writel(ctrl, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
> - writel(0, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STATUS);
> - } else if (imx_data->socdata->flags & ESDHC_FLAG_STD_TUNING) {
> - ctrl = readl(host->ioaddr + SDHCI_AUTO_CMD_STATUS);
> - ctrl &= ~ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SMPCLK_SEL;
> - ctrl &= ~ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_EXE_TUNE;
> - writel(ctrl, host->ioaddr + SDHCI_AUTO_CMD_STATUS);
> - /* Make sure ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_EXE_TUNE cleared */
> - ret = readl_poll_timeout(host->ioaddr + SDHCI_AUTO_CMD_STATUS,
> - ctrl, !(ctrl & ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_EXE_TUNE), 1, 50);
> - if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
> - dev_warn(mmc_dev(host->mmc),
> - "Warning! clear execute tuning bit failed\n");
> - /*
> - * SDHCI_INT_DATA_AVAIL is W1C bit, set this bit will clear the
> - * usdhc IP internal logic flag execute_tuning_with_clr_buf, which
> - * will finally make sure the normal data transfer logic correct.
> - */
> - ctrl = readl(host->ioaddr + SDHCI_INT_STATUS);
> - ctrl |= SDHCI_INT_DATA_AVAIL;
> - writel(ctrl, host->ioaddr + SDHCI_INT_STATUS);
> - }
> - }
> -}
> -
> static void esdhc_set_uhs_signaling(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned timing)
> {
> u32 m;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-02 10:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-28 9:04 [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: reset the tuning logic before execute tuning haibo.chen
2022-10-28 10:17 ` Fabio Estevam
2022-10-28 11:05 ` Bough Chen
2022-11-02 10:16 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2022-11-07 20:13 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=04db7720-c13c-2a32-c0ea-a8e72052807c@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=haibo.chen@nxp.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=sherry.sun@nxp.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox