From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Nizette Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 v2] at91/atmel-mci: inclusion of sd/mmc driver in at91sam9g45 chip and board Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:55:43 +1100 Message-ID: <1257216943.4358.66.camel@ben-desktop> References: <20090930155557.7dae503b@hskinnemoen-d830> <20091028083548.38f1d80c@hskinnemoen-d830> <1256763057.4362.36.camel@ben-desktop> <4AEF12B7.3040704@atmel.com> <4AEF95E0.7040602@bluewatersys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from outbound.icp-qv1-irony-out5.iinet.net.au ([203.59.1.105]:57306 "EHLO outbound.icp-qv1-irony-out5.iinet.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756308AbZKCCza (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:55:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4AEF95E0.7040602@bluewatersys.com> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Ryan Mallon Cc: Nicolas Ferre , Andrew Victor , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, "\"\\\"Thiago A.\\\" =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Corr=EAa=22?=" , kernel@avr32linux.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, David Brownell , David Brownell On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 15:30 +1300, Ryan Mallon wrote: > > > IIRC, we can't mark static inline functions as weak, and we don't want > to turn gpio_is_valid into an actual function call. We could do some > preprocessor magic, but that gets a bit messy. Messy but generally accepted. Have a grep for, eg, __HAVE_ARCH_ and HAVE_ARCH_BUG{_ON} --Ben.