From: Sergey Yanovich <ynvich@gmail.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@gmail.com>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "mmc: core: wait while adding MMC host to ensure root mounts successfully"
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 17:52:41 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1365083561.9806.43.camel@host5.omatika.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365082866-28404-2-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com>
On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 16:41 +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> index ad7decc..3bf1c46 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> @@ -2418,7 +2418,6 @@ void mmc_start_host(struct mmc_host *host)
> host->rescan_disable = 0;
> mmc_power_up(host);
> mmc_detect_change(host, 0);
> - mmc_flush_scheduled_work();
> }
>
> void mmc_stop_host(struct mmc_host *host)
Without some kind of synchronization between end of card probing and
start of root mounting, it is not safe to have root on an mmc card.
In other words, 'root_wait' will be mandatory to ensure successful mount
of root filesystem on an mmc card. It may be worth documenting
somewhere.
It is not a big deal. I could live with a patched kernel or pass the
parameter in the systems I work with. However, other people will fall in
this trap later, and it would be nice to let them know what to do.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-04 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-04 13:41 [PATCH 0/2] sdhci-acpi initialization performance regression Adrian Hunter
2013-04-04 13:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] Revert "mmc: core: wait while adding MMC host to ensure root mounts successfully" Adrian Hunter
2013-04-04 13:52 ` Sergey Yanovich [this message]
2013-04-04 13:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] mmc: core: fix performance regression initializing MMC host controllers Adrian Hunter
2013-04-04 21:02 ` Ulf Hansson
2013-04-05 7:26 ` Adrian Hunter
2013-04-05 7:40 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] mmc: core: fix performance regression initializing MMC, " Adrian Hunter
2013-04-05 9:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] mmc: core: fix performance regression initializing MMC " Ulf Hansson
2013-04-05 13:30 ` Adrian Hunter
2013-04-05 13:31 ` [PATCH V3 " Adrian Hunter
2013-04-08 9:41 ` Ulf Hansson
2013-04-08 10:49 ` [PATCH V4 " Adrian Hunter
2013-04-12 18:09 ` [PATCH 0/2] sdhci-acpi initialization performance regression Chris Ball
2013-04-15 6:47 ` Adrian Hunter
2013-04-15 15:42 ` Chris Ball
2013-04-17 5:55 ` Adrian Hunter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1365083561.9806.43.camel@host5.omatika.ru \
--to=ynvich@gmail.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=linkinjeon@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox