From: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
To: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: fix multiblock reads on i.MX53
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 08:45:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1366094712.4636.8.camel@weser.hi.pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363337366-8532-1-git-send-email-l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Ping.
Am Freitag, den 15.03.2013, 09:49 +0100 schrieb Lucas Stach:
> The eSDHC controller on the i.MX53 needs an additional, non spec
> compliant CMD12 after a multiblock read with a predefined number of
> blocks. Otherwise the internal state machine won't go back to the
> idle state.
>
> This commit effectively reverts 5b6b0ad6 (mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx:
> fix for mmc cards on i.MX5), which fixed part of the problem by
> making multiblock reads work, however this fix was not sufficient
> when multi- and singleblock reads got intermixed.
>
> This implements the recommended workaround (Freescale i.MX Reference
> Manual, section 29.6.8 "Multi-block Read") by manually sending a
> CMD12 with the RSPTYP bits cleared.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> v2:
> - clarified and fixed commit msg
> - converted multiblock state to an enum
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> index 78ac002..4bc0dd4 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> @@ -85,6 +85,12 @@ struct pltfm_imx_data {
> struct clk *clk_ipg;
> struct clk *clk_ahb;
> struct clk *clk_per;
> + enum {
> + NO_CMD_PENDING, /* no multiblock command pending*/
> + MULTIBLK_IN_PROCESS, /* exact multiblock cmd in process */
> + WAIT_FOR_INT, /* sent CMD12, waiting for response INT */
> + } multiblock_status;
> +
> };
>
> static struct platform_device_id imx_esdhc_devtype[] = {
> @@ -154,6 +160,8 @@ static inline void esdhc_clrset_le(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 mask, u32 val, i
>
> static u32 esdhc_readl_le(struct sdhci_host *host, int reg)
> {
> + struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> + struct pltfm_imx_data *imx_data = pltfm_host->priv;
> u32 val = readl(host->ioaddr + reg);
>
> if (unlikely(reg == SDHCI_CAPABILITIES)) {
> @@ -175,6 +183,18 @@ static u32 esdhc_readl_le(struct sdhci_host *host, int reg)
> val &= ~ESDHC_INT_VENDOR_SPEC_DMA_ERR;
> val |= SDHCI_INT_ADMA_ERROR;
> }
> +
> + /*
> + * mask off the interrupt we get in response to the manually
> + * sent CMD12
> + */
> + if ((imx_data->multiblock_status == WAIT_FOR_INT) &&
> + ((val & SDHCI_INT_RESPONSE) == SDHCI_INT_RESPONSE)) {
> + val &= ~SDHCI_INT_RESPONSE;
> + writel(SDHCI_INT_RESPONSE, host->ioaddr +
> + SDHCI_INT_STATUS);
> + imx_data->multiblock_status = NO_CMD_PENDING;
> + }
> }
>
> return val;
> @@ -211,6 +231,15 @@ static void esdhc_writel_le(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 val, int reg)
> v = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC);
> v &= ~ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC_SDIO_QUIRK;
> writel(v, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC);
> +
> + if (imx_data->multiblock_status == MULTIBLK_IN_PROCESS)
> + {
> + /* send a manual CMD12 with RESPTYP=none */
> + data = MMC_STOP_TRANSMISSION << 24 |
> + SDHCI_CMD_ABORTCMD << 16;
> + writel(data, host->ioaddr + SDHCI_TRANSFER_MODE);
> + imx_data->multiblock_status = WAIT_FOR_INT;
> + }
> }
>
> if (unlikely(reg == SDHCI_INT_ENABLE || reg == SDHCI_SIGNAL_ENABLE)) {
> @@ -277,11 +306,13 @@ static void esdhc_writew_le(struct sdhci_host *host, u16 val, int reg)
> }
> return;
> case SDHCI_COMMAND:
> - if ((host->cmd->opcode == MMC_STOP_TRANSMISSION ||
> - host->cmd->opcode == MMC_SET_BLOCK_COUNT) &&
> - (imx_data->flags & ESDHC_FLAG_MULTIBLK_NO_INT))
> + if (host->cmd->opcode == MMC_STOP_TRANSMISSION)
> val |= SDHCI_CMD_ABORTCMD;
>
> + if ((host->cmd->opcode == MMC_SET_BLOCK_COUNT) &&
> + (imx_data->flags & ESDHC_FLAG_MULTIBLK_NO_INT))
> + imx_data->multiblock_status = MULTIBLK_IN_PROCESS;
> +
> if (is_imx6q_usdhc(imx_data))
> writel(val << 16,
> host->ioaddr + SDHCI_TRANSFER_MODE);
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Lucas Stach |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-5076 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-16 6:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-14 14:43 [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: fix multiblock reads on i.MX53 Lucas Stach
2013-03-15 7:25 ` Shawn Guo
2013-03-15 8:49 ` [PATCH v2] " Lucas Stach
2013-04-16 6:45 ` Lucas Stach [this message]
2013-05-26 17:14 ` Chris Ball
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1366094712.4636.8.camel@weser.hi.pengutronix.de \
--to=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).