From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dinh Nguyen Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 6/6] mmc: dw_mmc: Add support DW SD/MMC driver on SOCFPGA Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 13:03:08 -0500 Message-ID: <1369418588.9717.0.camel@linux-builds1> References: <1369410080-436-1-git-send-email-dinguyen@altera.com> <1369410080-436-6-git-send-email-dinguyen@altera.com> <201305241910.37975.arnd@arndb.de> <201305241912.53751.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ch1ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com ([216.32.181.184]:44666 "EHLO ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754040Ab3EXSBI (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 May 2013 14:01:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <201305241912.53751.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, dinh.linux@gmail.com, Seungwon Jeon , Jaehoon Chung , Olof Johansson , Pavel Machek , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Hi Arnd, On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 19:12 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 24 May 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > It also seems odd to have this in the series for the ethernet driver. > > After I sent it I realized that your patches are actually for different > parts of the system, they were just all replies to the same first patch. > > It's usually helpful to add a [PATCH 0/6] message that explains the > overall intention and who you expect to pick up the patches, to avoid > the confusion I had. I apologize for that. Will make sure to include a [PATCH 0/6] message in the future. Dinh > > Arnd >