From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pawel Moll Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] mmc: sdhci-pltfm: Do not use parent as the host's device Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 17:36:25 +0100 Message-ID: <1407515785.31897.28.camel@hornet> References: <1406298233-27876-1-git-send-email-pawel.moll@arm.com> <1406298233-27876-3-git-send-email-pawel.moll@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from fw-tnat.austin.arm.com ([217.140.110.23]:21032 "EHLO collaborate-mta1.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752812AbaHHQg2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Aug 2014 12:36:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1406298233-27876-3-git-send-email-pawel.moll@arm.com> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Chris Ball , Anton Vorontsov , Ulf Hansson Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Olof Johansson , Stephen Warren , Catalin Marinas , "paul@pwsan.com" , Arnd Bergmann , Peter De Schrijver , "arm@kernel.org" , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" On Fri, 2014-07-25 at 15:23 +0100, Pawel Moll wrote: > The code selecting a device for the sdhci host has been > continuously tweaked (4b711cb13843f5082e82970dd1e8031383134a65 > "mmc: sdhci-pltfm: Add structure for host-specific data" and > a4d2177f00a5252d825236c5124bc1e9918bdb41 "mmc: sdhci-pltfm: dt > device does not pass parent to sdhci_alloc_host") while there > does not seem to be any reason to use platform device's parent > in the first place. >=20 > The comment saying "Some PCI-based MFD need the parent here" > seem to refer to Timberdale FPGA driver (the only MFD driver > registering SDHCI cell, drivers/mfd/timberdale.c) but again, > the only situation when parent device matter is runtime PM, > which is not implemented for Timberdale. >=20 > Cc: Chris Ball > Cc: Anton Vorontsov > Cc: Ulf Hansson > Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org > Signed-off-by: Pawel Moll > --- >=20 > This patch is a part of effort to remove references to platform_bus > and make it static. >=20 > Chris, Anton, Ulf - could you please advise if the assumptions > above are correct or if I'm completely wrong? Do you know what > where the real reasons to use parent originally? The PCI comment > seems like a red herring to me... Can I take the silence as a suggestion that the change looks ok-ish for you? Pawe=C5=82