From: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
To: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@chromium.org>,
Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@chromium.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
chris@printf.net, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/3] mmc: dw_mmc: Protect read-modify-write of INTMASK with a lock
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 12:49:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1417553397-460-4-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417553397-460-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org>
We're running into cases where our enabling of the SDIO interrupt in
dw_mmc doesn't actually take effect. Specifically, adding patch like
this:
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
@@ -1076,6 +1076,9 @@ static void dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq(struct mmc_host *mmc, int enb)
mci_writel(host, INTMASK,
(int_mask | SDMMC_INT_SDIO(slot->id)));
+ int_mask = mci_readl(host, INTMASK);
+ if (!(int_mask & SDMMC_INT_SDIO(slot->id)))
+ dev_err(&mmc->class_dev, "failed to enable sdio irq\n");
} else {
...actually triggers the error message. That's because the
dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq() unsafely does a read-modify-write of the
INTMASK register.
We can't just use the standard host->lock since that lock is not irq
safe and mmc_signal_sdio_irq() (called from interrupt context) calls
dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq(). Add a new irq-safe lock to protect INTMASK.
An alternate solution to this is to punt mmc_signal_sdio_irq() to the
tasklet and then protect INTMASK modifications by the standard host
lock. This seemed like a bit more of a high-latency change.
Reported-by: Bing Zhao <bzhao@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
---
Changes in v3: None
Changes in v2:
- intmask_lock renamed to irq_lock
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 13 +++++++++++++
include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
index ae10a02..64ea042 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
@@ -759,6 +759,7 @@ disable:
static int dw_mci_submit_data_dma(struct dw_mci *host, struct mmc_data *data)
{
+ unsigned long irqflags;
int sg_len;
u32 temp;
@@ -795,9 +796,11 @@ static int dw_mci_submit_data_dma(struct dw_mci *host, struct mmc_data *data)
mci_writel(host, CTRL, temp);
/* Disable RX/TX IRQs, let DMA handle it */
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&host->irq_lock, irqflags);
temp = mci_readl(host, INTMASK);
temp &= ~(SDMMC_INT_RXDR | SDMMC_INT_TXDR);
mci_writel(host, INTMASK, temp);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->irq_lock, irqflags);
host->dma_ops->start(host, sg_len);
@@ -806,6 +809,7 @@ static int dw_mci_submit_data_dma(struct dw_mci *host, struct mmc_data *data)
static void dw_mci_submit_data(struct dw_mci *host, struct mmc_data *data)
{
+ unsigned long irqflags;
u32 temp;
data->error = -EINPROGRESS;
@@ -834,9 +838,12 @@ static void dw_mci_submit_data(struct dw_mci *host, struct mmc_data *data)
host->part_buf_count = 0;
mci_writel(host, RINTSTS, SDMMC_INT_TXDR | SDMMC_INT_RXDR);
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&host->irq_lock, irqflags);
temp = mci_readl(host, INTMASK);
temp |= SDMMC_INT_TXDR | SDMMC_INT_RXDR;
mci_writel(host, INTMASK, temp);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->irq_lock, irqflags);
temp = mci_readl(host, CTRL);
temp &= ~SDMMC_CTRL_DMA_ENABLE;
@@ -1284,8 +1291,11 @@ static void dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq(struct mmc_host *mmc, int enb)
{
struct dw_mci_slot *slot = mmc_priv(mmc);
struct dw_mci *host = slot->host;
+ unsigned long irqflags;
u32 int_mask;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&host->irq_lock, irqflags);
+
/* Enable/disable Slot Specific SDIO interrupt */
int_mask = mci_readl(host, INTMASK);
if (enb)
@@ -1293,6 +1303,8 @@ static void dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq(struct mmc_host *mmc, int enb)
else
int_mask &= ~SDMMC_INT_SDIO(slot->sdio_id);
mci_writel(host, INTMASK, int_mask);
+
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->irq_lock, irqflags);
}
static int dw_mci_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
@@ -2661,6 +2673,7 @@ int dw_mci_probe(struct dw_mci *host)
host->quirks = host->pdata->quirks;
spin_lock_init(&host->lock);
+ spin_lock_init(&host->irq_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&host->queue);
/*
diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h b/include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h
index 42b724e..471fb31 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h
@@ -106,6 +106,11 @@ struct mmc_data;
* @cur_slot, @mrq and @state. These must always be updated
* at the same time while holding @lock.
*
+ * @irq_lock is an irq-safe spinlock protecting the INTMASK register
+ * to allow the interrupt handler to modify it directly. Held for only long
+ * enough to read-modify-write INTMASK and no other locks are grabbed when
+ * holding this one.
+ *
* The @mrq field of struct dw_mci_slot is also protected by @lock,
* and must always be written at the same time as the slot is added to
* @queue.
@@ -125,6 +130,7 @@ struct mmc_data;
*/
struct dw_mci {
spinlock_t lock;
+ spinlock_t irq_lock;
void __iomem *regs;
struct scatterlist *sg;
--
2.2.0.rc0.207.ga3a616c
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-02 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-02 20:49 [PATCH v4 0/3] Fixes for SDIO interrupts for dw_mmc Doug Anderson
2014-12-02 20:49 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] mmc: core: Support the optional init_card() callback for MMC and SD Doug Anderson
2014-12-02 23:15 ` Jaehoon Chung
2014-12-02 23:43 ` Doug Anderson
2014-12-02 20:49 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] mmc: dw_mmc: Cleanup disable of low power mode w/ SDIO interrupts Doug Anderson
2014-12-02 20:49 ` Doug Anderson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1417553397-460-4-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org \
--to=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=abrestic@chromium.org \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=chris@printf.net \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sonnyrao@chromium.org \
--cc=tgih.jun@samsung.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox