From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>, Dan O'Donovan <dan@emutex.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] mmc: sdhci: Always allow tuning to fall back to fixed sampling
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 11:20:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1480497614-3501-5-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1480497614-3501-1-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com>
SDHCI falls back to fixed sampling if there is an error during tuning.
However it also reports an error unless there is periodic re-tuning.
That is not the best option because:
a) there is a reasonable chance that fixed sampling will work, especially
at room temperature.
b) re-tuning will be done again anyway if there are CRC errors.
Change to return no error always when falling back to fixed sampling.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 20 ++------------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
index ad2f2c6113e4..a23887799f43 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
@@ -2098,8 +2098,6 @@ static int sdhci_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
sdhci_do_reset(host, SDHCI_RESET_CMD);
sdhci_do_reset(host, SDHCI_RESET_DATA);
- err = -EIO;
-
if (cmd.opcode != MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK_HS200)
goto out;
@@ -2137,24 +2135,10 @@ static int sdhci_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
ctrl &= ~SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING;
sdhci_writew(host, ctrl, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
}
- if (!(ctrl & SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK)) {
+ if (!(ctrl & SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK))
pr_info(DRIVER_NAME ": Tuning procedure failed, falling back to fixed sampling clock\n");
- err = -EIO;
- }
-
out:
- if (tuning_count) {
- /*
- * In case tuning fails, host controllers which support
- * re-tuning can try tuning again at a later time, when the
- * re-tuning timer expires. So for these controllers, we
- * return 0. Since there might be other controllers who do not
- * have this capability, we return error for them.
- */
- err = 0;
- }
-
- host->mmc->retune_period = err ? 0 : tuning_count;
+ host->mmc->retune_period = tuning_count;
sdhci_writel(host, host->ier, SDHCI_INT_ENABLE);
sdhci_writel(host, host->ier, SDHCI_SIGNAL_ENABLE);
--
1.9.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-30 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-30 9:20 [PATCH 0/4] mmc: sdhci: Fix recovery from tuning timeout Adrian Hunter
2016-11-30 9:20 ` [PATCH 1/4] Revert "mmc: sdhci: Reset cmd and data circuits after tuning failure" Adrian Hunter
2016-11-30 9:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] mmc: sdhci: Fix recovery from tuning timeout Adrian Hunter
2016-11-30 10:06 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-11-30 10:17 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-12-01 8:01 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-11-30 9:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] mmc: sdhci: Fix tuning reset after exhausting the maximum number of loops Adrian Hunter
2016-11-30 9:20 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1480497614-3501-5-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=dan@emutex.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox