From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 5/5] mmc: sdhci: Tidy tuning loop
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:04:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1480601071-8881-6-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1480601071-8881-1-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
index e9ff7d005851..1ac08e1a6211 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
@@ -2055,11 +2055,47 @@ static void sdhci_send_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 opcode,
spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
}
+static void __sdhci_execute_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 opcode,
+ unsigned long flags)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ /*
+ * Issue opcode repeatedly till Execute Tuning is set to 0 or the number
+ * of loops reaches 40 times.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_TUNING_LOOP; i++) {
+ u16 ctrl;
+
+ sdhci_send_tuning(host, opcode, flags);
+
+ if (!host->tuning_done) {
+ pr_info("%s: Tuning timeout, falling back to fixed sampling clock\n",
+ mmc_hostname(host->mmc));
+ sdhci_abort_tuning(host, opcode, flags);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ ctrl = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
+ if (!(ctrl & SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING)) {
+ if (ctrl & SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK)
+ return; /* Success! */
+ break;
+ }
+
+ /* eMMC spec does not require a delay between tuning cycles */
+ if (opcode == MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK)
+ mdelay(1);
+ }
+
+ pr_info("%s: Tuning failed, falling back to fixed sampling clock\n",
+ mmc_hostname(host->mmc));
+ sdhci_reset_tuning(host);
+}
+
static int sdhci_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
{
struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
- u16 ctrl;
- int tuning_loop_counter = MAX_TUNING_LOOP;
int err = 0;
unsigned long flags;
unsigned int tuning_count = 0;
@@ -2110,50 +2146,19 @@ static int sdhci_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
if (host->ops->platform_execute_tuning) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
- err = host->ops->platform_execute_tuning(host, opcode);
- return err;
+ return host->ops->platform_execute_tuning(host, opcode);
}
- sdhci_start_tuning(host);
-
- /*
- * Issue CMD19 repeatedly till Execute Tuning is set to 0 or the number
- * of loops reaches 40 times.
- */
- do {
- if (tuning_loop_counter-- == 0)
- break;
-
- sdhci_send_tuning(host, opcode, flags);
-
- if (!host->tuning_done) {
- pr_info(DRIVER_NAME ": Timeout waiting for Buffer Read Ready interrupt during tuning procedure, falling back to fixed sampling clock\n");
- sdhci_abort_tuning(host, opcode, flags);
- goto out;
- }
-
- ctrl = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
-
- /* eMMC spec does not require a delay between tuning cycles */
- if (opcode == MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK)
- mdelay(1);
- } while (ctrl & SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING);
+ host->mmc->retune_period = tuning_count;
- /*
- * The Host Driver has exhausted the maximum number of loops allowed,
- * so use fixed sampling frequency.
- */
- if (tuning_loop_counter < 0)
- sdhci_reset_tuning(host);
+ sdhci_start_tuning(host);
- if (tuning_loop_counter < 0 || !(ctrl & SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK))
- pr_info(DRIVER_NAME ": Tuning procedure failed, falling back to fixed sampling clock\n");
-out:
- host->mmc->retune_period = tuning_count;
+ __sdhci_execute_tuning(host, opcode, flags);
sdhci_end_tuning(host);
out_unlock:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
+
return err;
}
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-01 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-01 14:04 [PATCH RFC 0/5] mmc: sdhci: Tidy tuning Adrian Hunter
2016-12-01 14:04 ` [PATCH RFC 1/5] mmc: mmc: Introduce mmc_abort_tuning() Adrian Hunter
2016-12-01 14:04 ` [PATCH RFC 2/5] mmc: sdhci: Use mmc_abort_tuning() Adrian Hunter
2016-12-01 14:04 ` [PATCH RFC 3/5] mmc: sdhci: Factor out tuning helper functions Adrian Hunter
2016-12-01 14:04 ` [PATCH RFC 4/5] mmc: sdhci: Simplify tuning block size logic Adrian Hunter
2016-12-01 14:04 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2016-12-01 14:57 ` [PATCH RFC 0/5] mmc: sdhci: Tidy tuning Ulf Hansson
2016-12-02 8:28 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-12-02 13:51 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1480601071-8881-6-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox