From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
cja@gmx.net, darcari@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sdhci-acpi: support deferred probe
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 08:58:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1484096336.2253.4.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFo5jcv+YathFEG86fAPt=nH42Z35LjztDV0ozFNY8d48Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2017-01-10 at 16:38 +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 26 December 2016 at 03:28, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > With commit
> > 67bf5156edc4 (gpio / ACPI: fix returned error from
> > acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get()),
> > mmc_gpiod_request_cd() returns -EPROBE_DEFER if GPIO is not ready
> > when sdhci-acpi driver is probed, and sdhci-acpi driver should be
> > probed
> > again later in this case.
> >
> > This fixes an order issue when both GPIO and sdhci-acpi drivers are
> > built as
> > modules.
> >
> > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177101
> > Tested-by: Jonas Aaberg <cja@gmx.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
> Seems like both a fixes tag and a stable tag would we useful.
>
The order issue always exists.
And commit 67bf5156edc4 just makes it possible to fix it in this way.
I can cc stable 4.9 as it depends on 67bf5156edc4, but I don't think
this needs a fixes tag.
thanks,
rui
> Please re-spin and make also the changes that Adrian proposed to the
> change log.
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
>
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
> > b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
> > index 160f695..5440323 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
> > @@ -466,7 +466,10 @@ static int sdhci_acpi_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> > if (sdhci_acpi_flag(c, SDHCI_ACPI_SD_CD)) {
> > bool v = sdhci_acpi_flag(c,
> > SDHCI_ACPI_SD_CD_OVERRIDE_LEVEL);
> >
> > - if (mmc_gpiod_request_cd(host->mmc, NULL, 0, v, 0,
> > NULL)) {
> > + err = mmc_gpiod_request_cd(host->mmc, NULL, 0, v,
> > 0, NULL);
> > + if (err) {
> > + if (err == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > + goto err_free;
> > dev_warn(dev, "failed to setup card detect
> > gpio\n");
> > c->use_runtime_pm = false;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-
> > mmc" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-11 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-26 2:28 [PATCH] sdhci-acpi: support deferred probe Zhang Rui
2017-01-05 10:06 ` Adrian Hunter
2017-01-10 15:38 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-01-11 0:58 ` Zhang Rui [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1484096336.2253.4.camel@intel.com \
--to=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=cja@gmx.net \
--cc=darcari@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox