public inbox for linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
To: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Xiaobo Xie <xiaobo.xie@nxp.com>, Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Subject: [v5, 4/5] mmc: sdhci: Control the delay between tuning commands
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:14:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1492676084-28218-5-git-send-email-yangbo.lu@nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1492676084-28218-1-git-send-email-yangbo.lu@nxp.com>

From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>

The delay between tuning commands for SD cards is not part of the
specification. A driver that needs it probably needs it for eMMC
too, whereas most drivers would probably like to set it to 0. Make
it a host member (host->tuning_delay) that defaults to the existing
behaviour. Drivers can set it to zero to eliminate the delay, or
set it to a positive value to always have a delay.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
---
Changes for v2:
	- None
Changes for v3:
	- Used a host member for tuning delay instead of a quirk.(Adrian's patch)
	- Addressed warning in checkpatch.
Changes for v4:
	- None
Changes for v5:
	- None
---
 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 11 ++++++++---
 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
index 4bdad89..ecd0d43 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
@@ -2108,9 +2108,9 @@ static void __sdhci_execute_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 opcode)
 			break;
 		}
 
-		/* eMMC spec does not require a delay between tuning cycles */
-		if (opcode == MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK)
-			mdelay(1);
+		/* Spec does not require a delay between tuning cycles */
+		if (host->tuning_delay > 0)
+			mdelay(host->tuning_delay);
 	}
 
 	pr_info("%s: Tuning failed, falling back to fixed sampling clock\n",
@@ -2172,6 +2172,9 @@ int sdhci_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
 
 	host->mmc->retune_period = tuning_count;
 
+	if (host->tuning_delay < 0)
+		host->tuning_delay = opcode == MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK;
+
 	sdhci_start_tuning(host);
 
 	__sdhci_execute_tuning(host, opcode);
@@ -3114,6 +3117,8 @@ struct sdhci_host *sdhci_alloc_host(struct device *dev,
 	host->cqe_ier     = SDHCI_CQE_INT_MASK;
 	host->cqe_err_ier = SDHCI_CQE_INT_ERR_MASK;
 
+	host->tuning_delay = -1;
+
 	return host;
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
index 78437f8..0469fa1 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
@@ -538,6 +538,8 @@ struct sdhci_host {
 #define SDHCI_TUNING_MODE_1	0
 #define SDHCI_TUNING_MODE_2	1
 #define SDHCI_TUNING_MODE_3	2
+	/* Delay (ms) between tuning commands */
+	int			tuning_delay;
 
 	unsigned long private[0] ____cacheline_aligned;
 };
-- 
2.1.0.27.g96db324


  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-20  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-20  8:14 [v5, 0/5] Add SD UHS-I and eMMC HS200 support for eSDHC Yangbo Lu
2017-04-20  8:14 ` [v5, 1/5] mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: add peripheral clock support Yangbo Lu
2017-04-20  8:14 ` [v5, 2/5] mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: add support for signal voltage switch Yangbo Lu
2017-04-20 14:06   ` Ulf Hansson
2017-04-26  3:04     ` Y.B. Lu
2017-04-20  8:14 ` [v5, 3/5] mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: add tuning support Yangbo Lu
2017-04-20  8:14 ` Yangbo Lu [this message]
2017-04-20  8:14 ` [v5, 5/5] mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: add delay between tuning cycles Yangbo Lu
2017-04-20 14:05 ` [v5, 0/5] Add SD UHS-I and eMMC HS200 support for eSDHC Ulf Hansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1492676084-28218-5-git-send-email-yangbo.lu@nxp.com \
    --to=yangbo.lu@nxp.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=xiaobo.xie@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox