From: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@codeaurora.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>, ulf.hansson@linaro.org
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stummala@codeaurora.org, asutoshd@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] mmc: sdhci-msm: Add CQE support for sdhci-msm
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2017 10:46:34 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <150ccb40-bdf5-4668-033c-289a45c8c297@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e086ebd1-0602-f1bf-c586-55dbc99c1f73@intel.com>
On 8/31/2017 2:09 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 30/08/17 16:04, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Please ignore the previous patch series from a wrong email
>> address. Stupid gitconfig issue. Apologies for the spam.
>>
>> This is RFC patch series based on top of ulfh_mmc/cmdq branch
>> which is based upon Adrian's CMDQ patch series.
>>
>> Below patch series enables CQE for sdhci-msm platform.
>> This has been tested on internal 8996 MTP which has CMDQ support.
>>
>> Fixes w.r.t. CMDQ:-
>> There are some patches identified which were required atleast on
>> MSM platform. I am not sure if these are required for any other
>> CQE platform or not. Patchset 1, 3 & 4 commit text describes
>> the problems.
>>
>> Performance related:-
>> I gave one small shot for performance and the numbers were not looking good.
>> So, unless I have tested for performance completely, I should not discuss
>> on performance numbers as of now with this patchset.
>> I can try doing some more performance testing and post the results -
>> though this may take some while.
>
> You might also need custom Send Status Configuration.
Yes, I will check that once.
I think for the single job I/O this may not would have matter much.
But sure, I will check on this, if re-configuring is needed.
>
>>
>> I used below test script for random read/write test.
>>
>> *randwrite-test-script*
>> [global]
>> bs=32k
>> size=1g
>> rw=randwrite
>> direct=1
>> directory=/data/fiotest
>
> Random write results can vary a lot. It is important to know if the eMMC
> has lots of un-mapped blocks or not. e.g. for ext4 is the "-o discard"
> option being used. I find I get more consistent results if I always have
> discards enabled.
>
>>
>> [file1]
>> filename=singlefile1
>>
>> *randread-test-script*
>> [global]
>> bs=32k
>> size=1g
>> rw=randread
>> directory=/data/fiotest
>
> If you don't set numjobs > 1 then there is little benefit of the queue.
> Also still need direct=1
Yes, silly me. But still I got lower results with single job then.
But anyways let me again check this out. Thanks.
>
>>
>> [file1]
>> filename=singlefile1
>>
>> @Adrian,
>> Thanks a lot for pursuing and bringing CMDQ patch series to it's final stages :)
>>
>>
>> Ritesh Harjani (4):
>> mmc: cqhci: Move CQHCI_ENABLE before setting TDLBA/TDLBAU
>> mmc: sdhci-msm: Add CQHCI support for sdhci-msm
>> mmc: sdhci-msm: Change the desc_sz on cqe_enable/disable.
>> mmc: sdhci-msm: Handle unexpected interrupt case on enabling legacy
>> IRQs on CQE halt
>>
>> .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt | 1 +
>> drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig | 1 +
>> drivers/mmc/host/cqhci.c | 7 +-
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 4 files changed, 125 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center,
Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-02 5:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-30 13:04 [RFC 0/4] mmc: sdhci-msm: Add CQE support for sdhci-msm Ritesh Harjani
2017-08-30 13:04 ` [RFC 1/4] mmc: cqhci: Move CQHCI_ENABLE before setting TDLBA/TDLBAU Ritesh Harjani
2017-08-31 6:01 ` Adrian Hunter
2017-09-02 5:09 ` Ritesh Harjani
2017-08-30 13:04 ` [RFC 2/4] mmc: sdhci-msm: Add CQHCI support for sdhci-msm Ritesh Harjani
2017-08-31 7:25 ` Adrian Hunter
2017-09-02 5:10 ` Ritesh Harjani
2017-08-30 13:04 ` [RFC 3/4] mmc: sdhci-msm: Change the desc_sz on cqe_enable/disable Ritesh Harjani
2017-08-31 6:42 ` Adrian Hunter
2017-09-02 5:12 ` Ritesh Harjani
2017-08-30 13:04 ` [RFC 4/4] mmc: sdhci-msm: Handle unexpected interrupt case on enabling legacy IRQs on CQE halt Ritesh Harjani
2017-08-31 7:35 ` Adrian Hunter
2017-09-02 5:13 ` Ritesh Harjani
2017-08-31 8:39 ` [RFC 0/4] mmc: sdhci-msm: Add CQE support for sdhci-msm Adrian Hunter
2017-09-02 5:16 ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-08-30 12:59 Ritesh Harjani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=150ccb40-bdf5-4668-033c-289a45c8c297@codeaurora.org \
--to=riteshh@codeaurora.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stummala@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox