From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bart Van Assche Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: BFQ default for single queue devices Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 08:10:57 -0700 Message-ID: <1538665857.230807.1.camel@acm.org> References: <20181002124329.21248-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <05fdbe23-ec01-895f-e67e-abff85c1ece2@kernel.dk> <1eca41df95ff660eb247a3de666adeb4@natalenko.name> <20181004101305.GA6412@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-7" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20181004101305.GA6412@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown , Linus Walleij Cc: oleksandr@natalenko.name, Paolo Valente , Jens Axboe , linux-block , linux-mmc , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Pavel Machek , Ulf Hansson , Richard Weinberger , Artem Bityutskiy , Adrian Hunter , Jan Kara , aherrmann@suse.com, mgorman@suse.com, Chunyan Zhang , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , bfq-iosched@googlegroups.com List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 11:13 +-0100, Mark Brown wrote: +AD4 On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 10:14:38AM +-0200, Linus Walleij wrote: +AD4 +AD4 +AD4 And these are millions and millions of deployed +AD4 +AD4 systems not using udev+-systemd we are talking about, +AD4 +AD4 they are not fringe hobby projects. It's not that I +AD4 +AD4 personally dislike udev or anything, I kind of like +AD4 +AD4 it, but these tailored distros simply don't use it +AD4 +AD4 and they are huge in numbers. They need help to do +AD4 +AD4 the right thing. Fixing a udev rule doesn't solve +AD4 +AD4 even half the world's problems I'm afraid. +AD4 +AD4 Further, even those embedded systems that do use udev (some of them do +AD4 lean heavily on modern init stuff like that and systemd, especially when +AD4 boot time is a priority) they'll still need to get the relevant udev +AD4 rule installed somehow. Hi Mark, Are you aware that the systemd source tree includes a set of udev rules? See also https://github.com/systemd/systemd/tree/master/rules. Bart.