From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [RFC v02 04/15] dmaengine: edma: Add support for DMA filter mapping to slave devices Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 21:20:28 +0100 Message-ID: <1589780.JL62pLTh05@wuerfel> References: <1448891145-10766-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <1448891145-10766-5-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <20151201172212.GC1696@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20151201172212.GC1696@localhost> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Vinod Koul Cc: nsekhar@ti.com, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, andy.shevchenko@gmail.com, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 01 December 2015 22:52:12 Vinod Koul wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 03:45:34PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > > Add support for providing device to filter_fn mapping so client drivers > > can switch to use the dma_request_chan() API. > > Any reason why we dont want to go with DT based only for edma here? I think the OMAP2 based platforms using edma are all DT-only, but mach-davinci would need a lot of work for that. Arnd