From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: Highmem issues with MMC filesystem Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:45:32 +0000 Message-ID: <20100322114532.GA11355@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20100318112453.GA19544@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1269009677.31227.10.camel@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20100319144647.GG21280@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1269010320.31227.13.camel@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20100319183820.GB27710@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:55497 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754188Ab0CVLps (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:45:48 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: Catalin Marinas , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Hemanth V , saeed bishara , pierre@ossman.eu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 02:51:39PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > Nicolas > > Let's get a fresh set of clear bug reports giving all relevant information. > > Let's not continue to scatter small little bits of information in multiple > > emails. > > I think I did, less than 30 minutes ago. If you don't want to involve me in a discussion that I can clearly understand, that's fine, just don't expect me to be quick about applying any resulting patch. I've tried to make reasonable requests, but it seems that as per normal, reasonable requests get ignored.