From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Mundt Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] tmio: let platforms decide upon write-protection availability Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 17:10:19 +0900 Message-ID: <20100522081018.GD17814@linux-sh.org> References: <20100521123827.a8d7a87a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100522073332.GA17814@linux-sh.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from 124x34x33x190.ap124.ftth.ucom.ne.jp ([124.34.33.190]:40107 "EHLO master.linux-sh.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752928Ab0EVIKX (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 May 2010 04:10:23 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100522073332.GA17814@linux-sh.org> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski , "linux-sh@vger.kernel.org" , Ian Molton , Samuel Ortiz , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 04:33:33PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:38:27PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 19 May 2010 20:35:57 +0200 (CEST) > > Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > > > No changes to patches themselves, just re-sending with an ack added. > > > > > > Applies on top of the > > > > > > "[PATCH 0/10] add DMA support to tmio_mmc, using dmaengine API, use it on SH" > > > > > > patch series. > > > > > > > Paul, are you planning on merging the tem patches in the > > above-mentioned series for 2.6.35-rc1? > > > Yes, they'll be in my next round of updates for -rc1. Since I don't have > much else, I'll send those out today or tomorrow. Since the 0/3 and 0/2 series also had all of the acked-bys and so on I also took those. This at least lets us merge all of the sh platform patches at the same time without any odd dependency ordering. The ARM stuff I'll take care of separately after these have been merged.