From: Philip Langdale <philipl@overt.org>
To: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
adq_dvb@lidskialf.net,
"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: make sdhci work with ricoh mmc controller
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 09:11:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100603091113.7b1d6fc0@fido5> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1275527787-3783-1-git-send-email-maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 04:16:27 +0300
Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com> wrote:
> The current way of disabling it is not well tested by vendor
> and has all kinds of bugs that show up on resume from ram/disk.
>
> Old way of disabling is still supported by
> continuing to use CONFIG_MMC_RICOH_MMC.
>
> Based on
> 'http://list.drzeus.cx/pipermail/sdhci-devel/2007-December/002085.html'
As long as this doesn't limit the performance of MMC cards, I can't
complain.
BTW, the new PCIe native controllers from Ricoh don't require the
MMC controller to be disabled - the SD controller sees the cards by
default; I guess some bit has to be twiddled by the MMC driver.
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
> CC: adq_dvb@lidskialf.net
> CC: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.c | 34
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c |
> 5 ++++- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.c
> b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.c index 65483fd..3843780 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> #include <linux/pci.h>
> #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
>
> #include <linux/mmc/host.h>
>
> @@ -85,6 +86,26 @@ static int ricoh_probe(struct sdhci_pci_chip *chip)
> chip->pdev->subsystem_vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_SONY)
> chip->quirks |= SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_CARD_NO_RESET;
>
> + /* To disable hardware races against MMC part */
> + device_disable_async_suspend(&chip->pci_dev->dev);
> + return 0;
> +}
It would be nice if this could be more selective so it only happens
if it's really needed.
> +
> +static int ricoh_mmc_probe_slot(struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot)
> +{
> + slot->host->caps =
> + ((0x21 << SDHCI_TIMEOUT_CLK_SHIFT)
> + & SDHCI_TIMEOUT_CLK_MASK) |
> +
> + ((0x21 << SDHCI_CLOCK_BASE_SHIFT)
> + & SDHCI_CLOCK_BASE_MASK) |
> +
> + SDHCI_TIMEOUT_CLK_UNIT |
> + SDHCI_CAN_VDD_330 |
> + SDHCI_CAN_DO_SDMA ;
Have you been able to establish if 4bit and high-speed operations
work correctly through the MMC controller? I note that you didn't
set SDHCI_CAN_DO_HISPD.
> +
> + /* To disable hardware races against SDHC part */
> + device_disable_async_suspend(&slot->chip->pci_dev->dev);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -95,6 +116,11 @@ static const struct sdhci_pci_fixes sdhci_ricoh =
> { SDHCI_QUIRK_CLOCK_BEFORE_RESET,
> };
>
> +static const struct sdhci_pci_fixes sdhci_ricoh_mmc = {
> + .probe_slot = ricoh_mmc_probe_slot,
> + .quirks = SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_CARD_NO_RESET,
> +};
> +
> static const struct sdhci_pci_fixes sdhci_ene_712 = {
> .quirks = SDHCI_QUIRK_SINGLE_POWER_WRITE |
> SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_DMA,
> @@ -374,6 +400,14 @@ static const struct pci_device_id pci_ids[]
> __devinitdata = { },
>
> {
> + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_RICOH,
> + .device = 0x843,
> + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID,
> + .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID,
> + .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&sdhci_ricoh_mmc,
> + },
> +
> + {
> .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_ENE,
> .device = PCI_DEVICE_ID_ENE_CB712_SD,
> .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID,
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> index c6d1bd8..dbd9367 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -1687,7 +1687,10 @@ int sdhci_add_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
> host->version);
> }
>
> - caps = sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_CAPABILITIES);
> + if (host->caps)
> + caps = host->caps;
> + else
> + caps = sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_CAPABILITIES);
I'd prefer keying this off an explicit quirk.
>
> if (host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_FORCE_DMA)
> host->flags |= SDHCI_USE_SDMA;
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> index c846813..b41581a 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> @@ -292,6 +292,8 @@ struct sdhci_host {
>
> struct timer_list timer; /* Timer for
> timeouts */
> + unsigned int caps; /*
> Alternative capabilities */ +
> unsigned long private[0]
> ____cacheline_aligned; };
>
--phil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-03 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1275516180.30272.4.camel@maxim-laptop>
2010-06-03 1:16 ` [PATCH] mmc: make sdhci work with ricoh mmc controller Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-03 16:11 ` Philip Langdale [this message]
2010-06-03 16:31 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-03 16:39 ` Philip Langdale
2010-06-03 17:05 ` Philip Langdale
2010-06-03 17:35 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-04 4:42 ` Philip Langdale
2010-06-04 10:07 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-04 15:05 ` Philip Langdale
2010-06-04 15:33 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-06 21:24 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-06 21:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-06 23:11 ` Philip Langdale
2010-06-07 0:37 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-07 1:41 ` Philip Langdale
2010-06-11 19:08 ` [PATCH v3] " Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-11 19:15 ` [PATCH v4] " maximlevitsky
2010-06-13 11:29 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-13 16:06 ` Philip Langdale
2010-06-06 21:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] mmc: fix mmc card disappearence on resume on ricoh mmc controllers Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-06 23:22 ` Philip Langdale
2010-06-08 8:57 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-06 23:23 ` Chris Ball
2010-06-07 0:33 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-07 5:47 ` Chris Ball
2010-06-08 8:52 ` Maxim Levitsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100603091113.7b1d6fc0@fido5 \
--to=philipl@overt.org \
--cc=adq_dvb@lidskialf.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).