From: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
To: zhangfei gao <zhangfei.gao@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Saeed Bishara <saeed@marvell.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>,
eric.y.miao@gmail.com, Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add support PXA168/PXA910/MMP2 SD Host Controller
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 03:27:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100922022721.GB3821@void.printf.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=Rwj7hDfDxKqLNwyparxWv3RvQ2HJvo1qbJVe2@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:16:18PM -0400, zhangfei gao wrote:
> We have considered using the same driver with dove once saeed push the
> driver, but at last we decide to use seperate driver to easy
> maintaince and further extension.
>
> There are different IP developed by different group between Dove and
> pxa168/pxa910/mmp2, and would be more and more different.
> The pxa serious ip is follow sdh spec 3.0, and support sd 3.0 and emmc
> 4.4, which need ddr50 and 1.8v requirement, the limitation is adma
> still has some issue and in fixing.
> Still some private register with differnt address, such as power
> control, clock timming tunning and etc.
>
> The dove ip is follow sdh spec 2.0, and it has own limitation, such as
> 1.8v may not be supported.
>
> In a word, they are differnt ip, and it is reasonable to use seprate driver.
Okay. If we're going to have two different MV_SDHCI drivers, please
coordinate to have different Kconfig entries for the Dove/MMP and MMP2
drivers that correctly identify which SoCs are supported by each, and
resend. Neither driver should be called CONFIG_MV_SDHCI, since there
will be no one driver for all MV_SDHCIs.
Thanks,
- Chris.
--
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-22 2:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-20 9:46 [PATCH] add support PXA168/PXA910/MMP2 SD Host Controller zhangfei gao
2010-09-20 9:50 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-09-20 12:09 ` zhangfei gao
2010-09-20 13:10 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-09-21 8:24 ` zhangfei gao
2010-09-21 10:11 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-09-21 10:18 ` Eric Miao
2010-09-21 16:18 ` Chris Ball
2010-09-21 1:03 ` Chris Ball
2010-09-21 3:16 ` zhangfei gao
2010-09-22 2:27 ` Chris Ball [this message]
2010-09-21 9:42 ` claud yu
2010-09-26 9:05 ` zhangfei gao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100922022721.GB3821@void.printf.net \
--to=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=eric.y.miao@gmail.com \
--cc=haojian.zhuang@gmail.com \
--cc=kmpark@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saeed@marvell.com \
--cc=zhangfei.gao@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox