From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] sdhci-s3c: Add support no internal clock divider in host controller Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 02:51:54 +0100 Message-ID: <20100930015154.GA1269@void.printf.net> References: <1284626223-18944-1-git-send-email-jeongbae.seo@samsung.com> <1284626223-18944-6-git-send-email-jeongbae.seo@samsung.com> <20100917155928.GA7561@void.printf.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: ben-linux@fluff.org, Kyungmin Park Cc: Jeongbae Seo , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Hyuk Lee , =?utf-8?B?7KCV7J6s7ZuI?= List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Hi Kyungmin, Ben, On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:18:12AM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote: > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Chris Ball wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 06:08:28PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote: > >> Well there are two implementations. and no conclusion yet. > >> as s5pc210 don't support internal SDHCI clock, DMC overrides the > >> function operation itself when s5pc210. System LSI use the quirks. > >> > >> Choose any one from MMC maintainer. > > > > Both approaches are generally acceptable for MMC, so I would want to > > leave it up to the maintainer of the driver in question (which is Ben, > > in this case?) to choose between them. > > Hi Chris, > > Did you get the opinion from Ben? > > I hope this decision will be done before 2.6.37 merge windows start to > support SDHCI support on s5pc210. Hm, I didn't, and Ben's been silent about the urgent sdhci-s3c patches too. Ben, are you just dealing with a large backlog, or are you interested in nominating someone else to take over sdhci-s3c? Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child